Just saw the news on TV. Apparently some of the bullets were hitting the next apt.
Educate me please, I have no idea what you are talking about.
What is it that you don't understand?
The cop ignored the no-knock order.
He is charged for wanton endangerment.
Again I sense that I am not talking to a real person.
That is a problem.
I don't believe for a second the police announced themselves.
You made the claim. I have heard no such claim. How am I supposed to know if you're telling the truth or lying? I have to assume latter.
or......
you could use your intellectual curiosity and look it up?
But that might be too hard.
You marxists always want everyone to play by your rules. I don't do that
Then I will mark you off as lying.
oh shudder
or......
you could use your intellectual curiosity and look it up?
But that might be too hard.
You marxists always want everyone to play by your rules. I don't do that
Русский агент;3921971 said:
To effectively kill someone, center is the best way to go. Besides he didn't know they were cops.
True but it doesn't matter. If you're firing a gun at somebody that's lethal Force. It could possibly kill them. It is stupid to shoot to wound that's how you get killed. Once there's a hot piece of lead in you then you have all the right in the world to blow their brains out because they are using lethal Force against you.
He says he doesn't know it was the police that's hearsay.
Nope. Witnesses confirmed it.
I've heard that witnesses confirm the police identify themselves.
You heard that ONE witness confirmed it.
So one equals lying but more than one equals not lying isn't that just the appeal to majority?
Ask the judge.
If a judge work to say two witnesses are more right than one he should be removed from the bench.. accuracy is not a majority rule issue.
That's not how it works. LOL.