Eugenics in the United States

and right on cue....the usual onceler petulant whines with absolutely zero discussion on the topic or his earlier claim. it's who you are, you make these petulant little bs claims about how so and so can't read and how you don't think this or that changes something....then you run away when confronted with logic and stick solely to ad homs.

if you had anything of value to add, you would have. if you had an ounce of courage, you would try and explain WHY taking out half the sentence, doesn't change it. but you know you can't, you're just here to bitch like a little boy who didn't get his pudding, you're petulant shit stirrer....nothing more.

Meltdown!

Face it - you got busted, and really badly, and you tried to turn it into a "context" thing to deflect. It's what pathological liars do.
 
Rude and unpleasant since day one, really?

10-25-2010 10:50 AM #8 | Top
christiefan915

Welcome. Good posts. :good4u:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?28825-Salve

As long as we're getting personal, I neither like you, dislike you, or pay much attention to you. In fact, I thought those posts of yours that I actually read were pretty good,

Fair enough, I was wrong. I apologize.

until you began showing your hatred and bigotry toward Muslims. You denigrate them horribly and unfairly, in my opinion, and when I spoke up you began the groaning and snide comments.

My attacks are directed toward what I perceive to be an oppressive, harmful religion (especially to women and children). It is not toward individual Muslims and that was not my intention, although I'm willing to accept blame for how my words have been interpreted.

I apologize for my snide remarks/groans. It was unwarranted.

If you want to post hatred toward some religious or ethnic group, expect to be called on it. I despise bigots. You had me fooled for awhile, but not anymore.

I do not hate any religious group or ethnic group. However, I do despise systems that oppress the most vulnerable in society. In my opinion, Islam is one of those oppressive systems.
 
i have not seen you once in this thread criticize sanger...you seem to be defending her because other white men had the idea....there were many who believed in the ideology back then, its no secret christie

God, you're an idiot. First sentence: "Looks like Sanger got her kooky ideas..." And on the other thread I said she was nutty.

I'm not defending Sanger, lughead. I posted this as a defense to the thread about Hillary, and the unfair criticism that because she supports the work of Planned Parenthood, she must also support every dumb idea Sanger had.

I haven't seen any of you criticize the men of eugenics on this thread so I guess you must be defending them.

see....this exactly why ducneler is a dishonest moron and chrstie dishonestly culled her post - my point was that she blamed others, so what does christie do - she cuts out the part where she talks about others and says i'm nan idiot for thinking that...thats dishonest
 
Only in Yurtsie-ville is it not criticism to say that someone has "kooky ideas."

You're either really dumb, or a really bad & constant liar. You can choose on that one...
 
Meltdown!

Face it - you got busted, and really badly, and you tried to turn it into a "context" thing to deflect. It's what pathological liars do.

see....this exactly why ducneler is a dishonest moron and chrstie dishonestly culled her post - my point was that she blamed others, so what does christie do - she cuts out the part where she talks about others and says i'm nan idiot for thinking that...thats dishonest

^ the difference between intelligence and stupid hackery moronicness....onceler gives petulant ad homs whereas i fully explain what they dishonestly did and how her cutting out the part where she talks about others does in fact change the sentence.

another sad day for petulant little dunceler
 
Only in Yurtsie-ville is it not criticism to say that someone has "kooky ideas."

You're either really dumb, or a really bad & constant liar. You can choose on that one...


you're truly the most pathetic person on this board, you've sunk lower than desh....why do i even bother you with you, you just lie about pretty much everything and 95% of yhour posts are petulant ad homs
 
As I always say, pathological liars always think that everyone else is lying. Seriously - you have told at least a dozen documentable lies that I've seen today.

But you sound like you're about to cry. I'm starting to feel bad again...
 
My point is that Sanger took on the establishment and crusaded for a woman's right to use artificial birth control, back in the days when women had few rights of any kind. More people know of her in relation to Planned Parenthood and safe, legal birth control rather than her nuttier ideas on eugenics.

Your reaction is interesting. Do you have a problem with birth control? Or is it that you don't like it when the facts show that it was actually men who were the biggest proponents of eugenics? Not just men, racist bastards like Carnegie, Harriman, Gould and Rockefeller.

chrisite's "criticism" of sanger is saying she has "kooky" ideas.....but when she talks about others, they are racist bastards....

finally, kooky is not always criticism....some people go out of their way to be kiooky....but i love how the two liberal dunces of the board, think kooky is real criticism compared to her other criticisms
 
As I always say, pathological liars always think that everyone else is lying. Seriously - you have told at least a dozen documentable lies that I've seen today.

But you sound like you're about to cry. I'm starting to feel bad again...

of course you're too dumb to see the irony of your statement...given you call pretty much everyone else liars and just called me a liar with a dozen documented lies

:lol:
 
Pure projection, Yurtsie. You're the one constantly throwing "liar" around. I can't think of a poster on the left you haven't used it with, and many on the right as well.

I call you a liar; I think I've used it with bravo, and Dixie. Maybe another 1 or 2 in there, but not many, and not every single day like you do. And, ya know, I use it when people actually lie. It's an issue; you should take a look at it....
 
Pure projection, Yurtsie. You're the one constantly throwing "liar" around. I can't think of a poster on the left you haven't used it with, and many on the right as well.

I call you a liar; I think I've used it with bravo, and Dixie. Maybe another 1 or 2 in there, but not many, and not every single day like you do. And, ya know, I use it when people actually lie. It's an issue; you should take a look at it....

:lolup:

its only you, maybe these other two....oh wait and maybe another couple which is about half a dozen, but oh no, not many...and yes, you say it every single day

:lol:
 
:lolup:

its only you, maybe these other two....oh wait and maybe another couple which is about half a dozen, but oh no, not many...and yes, you say it every single day

:lol:

Yep; maybe 5 or 6, compared to 20+ for you. And you're the only one I call a liar quite a bit, because I'm fairly convinced that you're pathological. Sporadically w/ everyone else - when they actually lie.

You have a self-awareness thing, too. You're throwing out liar in a truly constant fashion, with pretty much every lefty poster. It's your go-to word when you're in desperate name-calling mode.
 
Just read back through this thread alone; it's all "dishonesty" and "lies" about me & christie, when you're the one who said christie hadn't criticized, and then offered a lame defense that sometimes kooky=good when you realized you were busted.

It's the projection of someone who is pathological. I'm trying to help.
 
Yep; maybe 5 or 6, compared to 20+ for you. And you're the only one I call a liar quite a bit, because I'm fairly convinced that you're pathological. Sporadically w/ everyone else - when they actually lie.

You have a self-awareness thing, too. You're throwing out liar in a truly constant fashion, with pretty much every lefty poster. It's your go-to word when you're in desperate name-calling mode.

20+ others....LOL...that pretty much all the regular members, that in itself is a lie....20+..tff....

i call you a liar, christie occassionally, zappa and thats about it...anyone else is a rare event, if at all...you...you call people liars every day...me, dixie, bravo, tinfoil, damo, SF....not each one everyday...but its laughable that you calling me pathological when you call more people liars than i do

the only time i call out lies is when there are actual lies...and with you, it is basically everyday....there are at least 4 today....

dude, you really need to drop the pathological routine, it just makes you look retardedly pathological and 20+....loooooooooooool
 
Just read back through this thread alone; it's all "dishonesty" and "lies" about me & christie, when you're the one who said christie hadn't criticized, and then offered a lame defense that sometimes kooky=good when you realized you were busted.

It's the projection of someone who is pathological. I'm trying to help.

really....kooky never means good...if you're not lying, then you're retardedly naive

http://www.kookys.com/kookystore/kollectors-c-327_417.html

http://www.zazzle.com/kooky+gifts

being kooky, odd or eccentric is all the rage now onceler....you should have googled before typing....sorry little old buddy
 
What's your point, exactly? Does the fact that Sanger wasn't the first person to promote eugenics (no shit, by the way) somehow make her views any less extreme? Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a racist bitch - accept it and move on.

Or that it was actually a Brit who got it all going? Or maybe that Sanger and ol' Adolph were friends and contemporaries? Or is it that somehow chris just can't bring herself to admit that Sanger, a woman lauded by liberals for years, and her liberal politics were racist and abominable.
 
chrisite's "criticism" of sanger is saying she has "kooky" ideas.....but when she talks about others, they are racist bastards....

finally, kooky is not always criticism....some people go out of their way to be kiooky....but i love how the two liberal dunces of the board, think kooky is real criticism compared to her other criticisms

This is a perfect example of following the chronology of the posts. If you had actually done it, you would see I was mimicking what bravo said, in the post I was responding to.


"I can certainly accept Sanger being the racist bitch that she was...what disturbs me is Hillary Clinton comparing her to Thomas Jefferson and cooing and aahing how much she admires the bitch....
and she is but one of many Democrats to praise the bitch and her organization....

Christiefan is probably ok with that ...... "


One can almost feel your desperation. :D
 
Fair enough, I was wrong. I apologize.



My attacks are directed toward what I perceive to be an oppressive, harmful religion (especially to women and children). It is not toward individual Muslims and that was not my intention, although I'm willing to accept blame for how my words have been interpreted.

I apologize for my snide remarks/groans. It was unwarranted.



I do not hate any religious group or ethnic group. However, I do despise systems that oppress the most vulnerable in society. In my opinion, Islam is one of those oppressive systems.

Thank you for saying this. I'm sorry for coming off as being unkind to you personally, it was never the intent. Peace.
 
20+ others....LOL...that pretty much all the regular members, that in itself is a lie....20+..tff....

i call you a liar, christie occassionally, zappa and thats about it...anyone else is a rare event, if at all...you...you call people liars every day...me, dixie, bravo, tinfoil, damo, SF....not each one everyday...but its laughable that you calling me pathological when you call more people liars than i do

the only time i call out lies is when there are actual lies...and with you, it is basically everyday....there are at least 4 today....

dude, you really need to drop the pathological routine, it just makes you look retardedly pathological and 20+....loooooooooooool

You go off on so many tangents it's next to impossible trying to figure out how to respond. You hijacked this thread with all your posts about lying, culling, etc. We all could have had an interesting discussion about eugenics but you succeeded in pulling the thread into the gutter with your whining.

Time for me to post another controversial topic, this thread is shot. :readit:
 
I should give it a shot, huh?.....Like you gave a shot to Thomas Jefferson referring to his sex life with a Negro slave like that was the only thing he did in his life that mattered.....
Give it a shot ?.....Maybe you ought to give it a rest while you still have some dignity left.

Maybe Jefferson was like Gingrich. Recall Gingrich saying that due to his devotion to politics and serving his country he was driven to have sex outside his marriage. Maybe politics increases ones sex drive.

Throw out the Viagra and enter politics. Sort of a natural, holistic approach.
 
Back
Top