Epic fail: the GOP's attempt to woo minorities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cancel4
  • Start date Start date

the thread is about GOP failures to woo minorities...

your yawning is indicative of the approach taken by your party to fix that glaring problem, which will only get worse as the demographic trends continue.

sweet dreams, truth crusader!
 
it will be interesting to see if that is, in fact, an accurate metric come 2010.

my guess is: not so much.:rolleyes:

We will see. So why do you choose to describe yourself as a Yellow Dog Democrat? Don't you realize that it means you're a racist?
 
I think this pretty much sums up the approach that Democrats take toward a third of their base.....what puzzles me is why minorities tolerate it.....

we own it FOR GOOD REASON... we don't do anything that would jeopardize it.

again...

what are you gonna DO about it, that's what I wanna know?

it seems clear to me that whining about it and being puzzled by it really hasn't gotten you very far...
 
I disagree with your characterization.

sorry.
The use of the term dates back to around 1900, when it was used to describe Southern Democrats, and it became popularized during the 1928 Presidential contest. Many Democrats in the South had lingering resentments against the Republicans left over from the period of Reconstruction after the Civil War, and as a result they decided to stand behind the Democratic party, sometimes at all costs, rather than supporting Republicans. The yellow dog Democrats were a serious force to be reckoned with in the American south as a result.

The term is a reference to the “yaller dog,” both the term for a generic Southern dog and a specific breed of dog which is widely used in the South for hunting. The implication behind the term “yellow dog Democrat” is that someone would rather vote for a mangy yaller dog than a Republican candidate. The yellow dog Democrats ensured a strong showing in Southern elections for decades, until reformations in the party and national politics began to sway the balance more towards Republicans, but the voting base of Southern Democrats continues to be quite strong, and it is often heavily courted by Democratic candidates during the primaries.

Although the term was originally used somewhat pejoratively, some Democrats have embraced it, using it as affectionate slang and a term of endearment. Loyal Democrats can even purchase yellow dog gear to proclaim their loyalty to the party, and the term is referenced by the Blue Dog Democrats, a conservative coalition of Democrats in the House of Representatives on Capitol Hill.

Depending on how one views party loyalty, yellow dog Democrats could be considered both good and bad. On the good side, yellow dog Democrats often donate substantially to the party and urge friends to vote, upping voter turnout for the party. However, blind obedience is not necessarily a desirable trait, especially in politics, and political parties often benefit from internal dissent, developing new policies and approaches in response to such dissent and in turn becoming stronger.
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-are-yellow-dog-democrats.htm


The Yellow Dogs resented getting their slaves taken away from them by Republicans. *shrug*
 
from your own link:

Although the term was originally used somewhat pejoratively, some Democrats have embraced it, using it as affectionate slang and a term of endearment.

I use it because, to me, it means that I would rather vote for a yellow dog than I would a republican... and I will be that kind of yellow dog democrat until the day that either my party abandons ME, or the republican party abandons its wacky racist homophobic evangelical base.
 
from your own link:

Although the term was originally used somewhat pejoratively, some Democrats have embraced it, using it as affectionate slang and a term of endearment.

I use it because, to me, it means that I would rather vote for a yellow dog than I would a republican... and I will be that kind of yellow dog democrat until the day that either my party abandons ME, or the republican party abandons its wacky racist homophobic evangelical base.

You can call certain members of the GOP any name you like, but the record shows that the Democrat Party is the racist party, especially the Yellow Dogs.
 
You can call certain members of the GOP any name you like, but the record shows that the Democrat Party is the racist party, especially the Yellow Dogs.

I can call myself a yellowdog democrat AND DO...

and I am not racist. I just hate republicans.

so your point is meaningless in this instance.
 
I can call myself a yellowdog democrat AND DO...

and I am not racist. I just hate republicans.

so your point is meaningless in this instance.
You claim not to be racist, but your own moniker and extremism related to it prove that you are. Beyond a reasonable doubt, or course.
 
You claim not to be racist, but your own moniker and extremism related to it prove that you are. Beyond a reasonable doubt, or course.

my moniker, by your own link might have ORIGINALLY been a racist term, but now has evolved. I use it in its evolved meaning.

you really should read the articles you post.:pke:
 
from your own link:

Although the term was originally used somewhat pejoratively, some Democrats have embraced it, using it as affectionate slang and a term of endearment.

I use it because, to me, it means that I would rather vote for a yellow dog than I would a republican... and I will be that kind of yellow dog democrat until the day that either my party abandons ME, or the republican party abandons its wacky racist homophobic evangelical base.

my moniker, by your own link might have ORIGINALLY been a racist term, but now has evolved. I use it in its evolved meaning.

you really should read the articles you post.:pke:



lmao.....just last week you argued that "great white hope" could ONLY mean the original meaning as used and could not mean the new definition that has been embraced....but now you argue the opposite stance because it suits your agenda.....

its so easy to show your intellectual dishonesty.....:pke:
 
lmao.....just last week you argued that "great white hope" could ONLY mean the original meaning as used and could not mean the new definition that has been embraced....but now you argue the opposite stance because it suits your agenda.....

its so easy to show your intellectual dishonesty.....:pke:

LIAR... I NEVER said that great white hope could ONLY mean any one thing.

I said that, when used to describe the hopes of an all-white party in their efforts to topple the party whose heavyweight champ was a black man, the original meaning certainly could be applied.

it is SO easy to show your sleazy "intellectual" - and I use that term loosely - dishonesty.

isn't it time for you to make some coffee?
 
my moniker, by your own link might have ORIGINALLY been a racist term, but now has evolved. I use it in its evolved meaning.

you really should read the articles you post.:pke:

LIAR... I NEVER said that great white hope could ONLY mean any one thing.

I said that, when used to describe the hopes of an all-white party in their efforts to topple the party whose heavyweight champ was a black man, the original meaning certainly could be applied.

it is SO easy to show your sleazy "intellectual" - and I use that term loosely - dishonesty.

isn't it time for you to make some coffee?

i suggest in addition to working on your anger managment, you bone up on reading comprehension.....i never lie and once again, you're wrong that i lied here.....i said:

could ONLY mean the original meaning as used and could not mean the new definition that has been embraced

clearly referring to as used by the congresswoman.....as that was the subject i was referring to

your intellectual dishonest is readily apparent, you will not accept that she said she did not mean it that way, you will not accept that it is now commonly "embraced" in a non racial manner.......but you require that we accept what YOU want and what you think it is embraced by and that we must ignore the original meaning.....

its amusing how easy it is to point out, not only your hypocrisy, but your intellectually dishonest arguments
 
my moniker, by your own link might have ORIGINALLY been a racist term, but now has evolved. I use it in its evolved meaning.

you really should read the articles you post.:pke:
I don't see any evidence that it has evolved. You just admitted that you "hate Republicans". This hatred can be traced back to the Civil War when we kicked your asses, burned your houses and freed your slaves, therefore it is a continued badge of defiance. Just like the Confederate flag.
 
I don't see any evidence that it has evolved. You just admitted that you "hate Republicans". This hatred can be traced back to the Civil War when we kicked your asses, burned your houses and freed your slaves, therefore it is a continued badge of defiance. Just like the Confederate flag.

I only hate modern day republicans. I am a lifelong fan of Abe Lincoln, for example. Your own link states that the term has evolved. and I use it in its evolved sense.
 
Back
Top