EPA EMPLOYEES "openly celebrated" in the halls about PRUITTS 'firing'...

Havana Moon said:
Did he put that on the EPA website? Yet the EPA under Obama, put many highly controversial statements about climate change on there but you won't say anything about that.
Click to expand...

That could be because she's a hypocrite, or it could be because she's stupid. :dunno:
 
krudzu said:
Pruitt Was Told to Resign in Call From White House, Sources Say
Click to expand...

So you keep claiming, krudzu.

Reposting that link to an article making that assertion without any evidence that it actually happened seems compulsive to me.

Did someone tell you that if you repeat a lie enough times people will come to believe it?
 
krudzu said:
Evangelicals have a LONG history of opposing conservationists and environmentalists. Makes no sense to me since they call themselves "conservatives", but they don't want to conserve the environment.
Click to expand...

So because you are a religious bigot and your own straw-man argument "makes no sense" to you, you want others to accept your position, krudzu?
 
kudzu said:
Pruitt also supported a bill called the Teacher Protection Act, which would have required textbooks in Oklahoma to add a 251-word disclaimer about Darwin's theory of evolution. That disclaimer included this line: "any statement about life's origins should be considered as theory, not fact." In a 2005 radio interview first unearthed by Politico, Pruitt said, "there aren't sufficient scientific facts to establish the theory of evolution."
Click to expand...

Is something wrong with a disclaimer when unproven theories are being taught to children, krudzu?
 
krudzu said:
Scott Pruitt Was ‘Devastated’ that Trump Finally Wanted Him Out: Report
Click to expand...

I guess you are either dishonest or extremely stupid, krudzu. That blog post cites the same inconclusive Bloomberg article that you keep citing in this thread.
 
Evolution is established science that fits in with other branches of science. I know this is probably too deep but, how much evidence does it take to "prove" something?
 
mak2 said:
Evolution is established science that fits in with other branches of science. I know this is probably too deep but, how much evidence does it take to "prove" something?
Click to expand...

Pruitt fired scientists to replace them with industry heads... Does that make sense to anyone?
 
Havana Moon said:
Did he put that on the EPA website? Yet the EPA under Obama, put many highly controversial statements about climate change on there but you won't say anything about that.
Click to expand...

List them. And no, evolution denial and climate change denial do not make either evolution or climate science controversial just because right wing oily science deniers contest them without any facts.
Your masters' collective interests in their own wallets does not science make.
 
countryboy said:
I thought you were conservative? It doesn't take much to be the equal of Lesion. He is a mere caricature of conservatism.
Click to expand...

Legion is a caricature of everything......just depends on which sock he is wearing.......the trick is to use him the way you would the backboard of a basketball hoop......
 
Dark Soul said:
That's just Democrat bullshit. No conservative is against conservation. We are against environmentalist whackos who think man is intent on destroying the earth
Click to expand...

agreed......I don't know anyone who is opposed to protecting the environment.......libr'ruls think that just because we didn't fall for their lies about man made global warming we hate science and hate the earth.......now that science has proved it was all lies they can't face the truth.......
'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top