Of course I judge him.. He rejects science and thinks man lived with dinosaurs.
EPA EMPLOYEES "openly celebrated" in the halls about PRUITTS 'firing'...
- Thread starter Centerleftfl
- Start date
Of course I judge him.. He rejects science and thinks man lived with dinosaurs.
Scott Pruitt Was Informed Of His Own Resignation By John Kelly on orders from Trump.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-been-told-to-resign-in-call-from-white-house
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-been-told-to-resign-in-call-from-white-house
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
and do you have proof he believes men lived with dinosaurs and that he rejects science?.......
Evangelicals reject environmental concerns.
It’s useful to look back to the dawn of the modern environmental movement, which began in the late 1960s, a time of terrible environmental degradation. American cities were choking in smog thick enough to obscure buildings on the same block, toxic waste flowed out of exposed drainpipes, and rivers were catching fire.
The Republican Party of the 1960s wasn’t ideologically opposed to environmental regulation. Richard Nixon helped create the Environmental Protection Agency. Republican Congressman Pete McCloskey co-chaired the first Earth Day. But even then, American Christians were leery of the environmental movement. Why?
https://slate.com/technology/2018/0...f-environmentalism-explains-scott-pruitt.html
As would I, JC, but they don't appear to have tried that tack, do they?
I beg to differ, and bid you to consider yourself as just one example.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
not only is that article based on bigotry instead of fact, it doesn't even mention Pruitt's beliefs in specifics......just more of your classic irrelevance.......I invite you to join the 21st century and to prove your idiotic claims for a change.....
According to Jennifer Jacobs and Jennifer A. Dlouhy, who can only cite "people who asked not to be named" as "sources".
You accept that as credible evidence?
Think carefully before replying.
Is that your consistent opinion - for the record?
I have already posted 3 with links.
Trump had John Kelly fire Pruitt and Pruitt was devastated.
Always a possibility. Sadly, according to Jeff Weaver, Fauxcahontas Warren, and Donna Brazile, the reason we'll never know is collusion.
DEMOCRAT collusion.
Posting a link proves nothing by itself, krudzu. The content of the link is critical if one wishes to offer convincing evidence to logically support an argument.
You posted one link in reference to the claim that Pruitt was "forced to resign", krudzu.
The Slate article you linked to I consider irrelevant, since it is seemingly bias confirmation for your religious bigotry, which is not the focus of your discussion with me.
Did you trouble yourself to read the text of the article at the Bloomberg link you posted and cited three times as an authoritative source?
So the authors claim, based on alleged anonymous sources whose statements are impossible to confirm or disprove.
Jennifer Jacobs and Jennifer A. Dlouhy base their claims on highly-suspect anonymous sources, who may not even exist as far as anyone can prove.
BTW, krudzu, posting the same link 3 times does not mean you cited 3 different sources.
Pruitt Was Told to Resign in Call From White House, Sources Say
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-been-told-to-resign-in-call-from-white-house
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-been-told-to-resign-in-call-from-white-house
Scott Pruitt Was ‘Devastated’ that Trump Finally Wanted Him Out: Report
http://www.liberty-and-justice-for-...ted-that-trump-finally-wanted-him-out-report/
http://www.liberty-and-justice-for-...ted-that-trump-finally-wanted-him-out-report/
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Do you still think that multiple sources reporting the same thing is the same as "at least two unrelated confirmations"?I’ll just be looking for two unrelated confirmations in everything you post. That is your criteria, and that’s what you will need to back up your posts on here from now on. It’s your rules
Pruitt also supported a bill called the Teacher Protection Act, which would have required textbooks in Oklahoma to add a 251-word disclaimer about Darwin's theory of evolution.
That disclaimer included this line: "any statement about life's origins should be considered as theory, not fact."
In a 2005 radio interview first unearthed by Politico, Pruitt said, "there aren't sufficient scientific facts to establish the theory of evolution."
https://www.npr.org/2018/05/01/6071...k-how-scott-pruitts-faith-drives-his-politics
That disclaimer included this line: "any statement about life's origins should be considered as theory, not fact."
In a 2005 radio interview first unearthed by Politico, Pruitt said, "there aren't sufficient scientific facts to establish the theory of evolution."
https://www.npr.org/2018/05/01/6071...k-how-scott-pruitts-faith-drives-his-politics
Do you still think that multiple sources reporting the same thing is the same as "at least two unrelated confirmations"?
Evangelicals have a LONG history of opposing conservationists and environmentalists.
https://slate.com/technology/2018/0...f-environmentalism-explains-scott-pruitt.html
Makes no sense to me since they call themselves "conservatives", but they don't want to conserve the environment.
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
The only exception I've ever seen to this are people who hunt.... they have a vested interest in preserving wildlife (at least the tasty kind) and their habitat.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Did he put that on the EPA website? Yet the EPA under Obama, put many highly controversial statements about climate change on there but you won't say anything about that.