Enemy Mine.

Poor Blabo.



In another thread Mister Moral Highground boasts about using his 'work' spam filter to hide the posts in which I kick his ass.


So he's stealing time, bandwidth and resources from his employer?


What would Jesus do?
 
Poor Blabo.



In another thread Mister Moral Highground boasts about using his 'work' spam filter to hide the posts in which I kick his ass.


So he's stealing time, bandwidth and resources from his employer?


What would Jesus do?

He's obsessed. He's asking everyone to ignore you but he posts his little smiley in almost every thread. That's ignoring, huh!
 
Newsflash: headscarves, stoning, circumcision etc. are and were all ACCEPTED practices long before Muhammad was born. Enslaving women is mentioned in the Bible. Muslim, Jewish and Christian men didn't get stoned, beaten etc. because their patriarchal, conservative cultures ALL considered females to be lesser beings than males.

Try and get a clue.
What are you, a bible thumper now....I really don't give a rats ass whats in the bible, the torah, or the koran........I'm really supposed to give a shit what barbaric practices were accepted in the first, second forth centuries....or in the years 5 bc or 10 bc.....???? I don't think so, you loon....

If Hitler claimed his was broiling Jews because it was part of his new religion, your the kind of nitwit that would come to his defense.....

I'm more concerned that some of these barbaric practices are still going on today and pinheads like you and in other parts of the world accept them in the name of religion....
its the clueless like you that are quick to tell others they are clueless.....
 
Well, well, well. Isn't this interesting: "Though I certainly realize Beck makes mistakes and isn't right 100% of the time..."

When Beck makes mistakes you become his apologist. When Obama makes mistakes you put it in your signature.

When Obama makes mistakes I put it in my sig. only because when Palin or Bachmann mis-speak you riducule them for months afterwards....while YOU become Obama's apologist

You reap what you sow.....
 
He's obsessed. He's asking everyone to ignore you but he posts his little smiley in almost every thread. That's ignoring, huh!
smilies-4993.png
 
What are you, a bible thumper now....I really don't give a rats ass whats in the bible, the torah, or the koran........I'm really supposed to give a shit what barbaric practices were accepted in the first, second forth centuries....or in the years 5 bc or 10 bc.....???? I don't think so, you loon....

If Hitler claimed his was broiling Jews because it was part of his new religion, your the kind of nitwit that would come to his defense.....

I'm more concerned that some of these barbaric practices are still going on today and pinheads like you and in other parts of the world accept them in the name of religion....
its the clueless like you that are quick to tell others they are clueless.....

More sweeping generalization, in so many ways.

First, I don't support anyone's barbaric practices, whether we're talking about stoning or waterboarding.

Second, I don't libel an entire religion because of the crimes of the extremists.
 
You wanted me to include Judeo-Christian religions mentioned with the same derogatory words as I did the others. ? I gave you even more....whats the beef...


All one has to do is follow the chronology of the post to see that I wanted NOHTING from our babbling Bravo....I merely pointed out the FACT that he prefaced to religious beliefs with derrogatory descriptions, but did not do the same for the Judeo-Chrisitian religions he named. You don't need to be Freud to figure that one out folks....and Bravo squeals like all willfully ignorant, race baiting little pigs when caught.

What you point out is one demeaning term used to ridicule the Tea Party.....(and its origin is irrelevant )

Like all intellectually bankrupt neocon clowns, Bravo repeats his willful ignorance like a badge of honor. The chronology of the posts clearly shows that Bravo introduced "teabagger" as on par with racial, ethnic and religious slurs and bigotry. I merely pointed out the facts as to why this isn't necessarily the case, but like a good little parrot, Bravo wants no part of any fact and logic, and stated just that. So Bravo makes a claim and cares not that he cannot logically or factually support it....small wonder why I call Bravo intellectually impotent.What I point out is numerous demeaning terms used to ridicule many other groups....and its has EVERYTHING to do with the topic....

It has EVERYTHING to do with your original point that " the jokes you think are harmless about someone's race or religion or culture that are told among your friends may be taken seriously by one."
(race, religion, culture, expand your post far beyond the tea party folks)

the "tea party" is a political party, NOT a culture or specific race (it's a given we are all part of the human race)....unless our babbling Bravo can provide some evidence that teabaggers (folk who belong to the Tea Party) want a theocratic society based on their "Tea Party" religious beliefs. Otherwise, Bravo's assertion falls flat...much like Bravo off the barstool when he runs to spew out one of his blue bold diatribes.

You seriously limit your point about demeaning others to "jokes"....or race or religion or culture ?...How about politics ? Clothes? Weight ?


Now here is were Bravo's intellectual dishonesty dribbles out......unable to fault my premise or it's target (intellectually lazy, dishonest, ignorant, stubborn and subliminally bigoted bumpkins like Bravo), Bravo just blows smoke with suggested exaggerations to the point of distortion. What Bravo FAILS or REFUSES to accept is that Brevik has stated in his own words of his xenophobic attitudes to maintain a pure Norwegian culture, how he specifically saw muslims along with "multi-culturalism" as a threat and how he blamed a political party for what he perceived to be accomplis to these threats. I SPECIFICALLY pointed out how similar attitudes are NOT the sole domain of muslims or a specific political party or country, and how through history RACISM & BIGOTRY against a specific group of people were used by a specific political party to gain power through attrocities....and that it can happen (has happened) in one's own backyard. But Bravo is either too dumb or too stubborn to accept this, and will now just continue to repeat his delusional drivel ad nauseum until I give him the answer he wants (not the logical conclusion based on all the facts) ....a typical idiot ploy by failed neocon and racist debaters.

Any uncivil demeaning bullshit rhetoric can set the stage for violence and set off an angry person ....
.the very same kind of uncivil demeaning bullshit rhetoric YOU use here on a regular basis.....which earns the same kind of response from those you demean and ridicule and it escalates from there......so practice what you preach or STFU and leave the sermons for Rev. Al....

Ahhh, but I am NOT discussing "any uncivil demeaning bullshit rhetoric ", I am talking about Breivik in Norway who has been VERY specific about what he thinks justifies his actions....a combination of racial/ethnic purity credo coupled with anti-muslim vehemence....similar mindsets that are and have been found through out history and the world.

Being angry doesn't justify pseudo-nazi manifesto's chock full of quotes from American neocon pundits or the murder of innocent youth....that's a mindset that goes beyond anger, it's just hate born of a selfish and narcissistic attitude.

Bravo's problem is obviously some personal axe he has to grind with me....so much so that he makes accusations that the chronology of the posts does not support (with the exception of my retorts to Bravo's character, brought on by his unwarranted personal attack and racists blatherings). Obviously, my assertions and viewpoints hit too close to home for Bravo, so he lashes out like a maddened child.


You want "willfully ignorant"?....look in any mirror....and re-read your post



And with Bravo's final school yard retort, we leave him to lurch back to the barstool with feelings of deluded smugness. ;)
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Check it out:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...076#post841076

With Al Jazeera, international news networks, and domestic networks all raising the link to an Islamic radical Norway was deporting, I put on twitter that the odds were it wasn’t an angry Lutheran doing the bombing and shooting and noted on the radio the possible links to Islamic radicals.
It appears that each of those links followed the general line of thought... right up to the point that they were all proven wrong.

Which means your claim that they are 'still' stating that it has ties to Al Queda is false. People made an ASSUMPTION... that ASSUMPTION was made even by Al Jazeera according to YOUR LINK. But when they found out the truth, WHO continued stating it was still linked to Al Queda????

This is why for 10 years I've tried to teach neocon numbskulls to READ CAREFULLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY. I stated that the "still TRIED"....meaning past tense, meaning that they are NOT doing it now.

Furthermore, it appears that our Super Freak did not follow my forementioned instructions, as the links in post #30 CLEARLY show how Maulkin gives but a brief tweet regarding Breivik, but devotes numerous, redundant paragraphs about one major case of an islamic fundamentalist with ties to extremist acts and a few individual cases of crimes in Norway commited by muslims (but NOT connected to terrorism).

It also appears that our Super Freak did not READ the ENTIRE piece by Erickson, who while admitting he was (along with Al Jaazera and a host of US neocon pundits and conservative broadcasters and the MSM) wrong, goes off on a tangent exaggerated and distorted suppostion and conjecture as how (generalized) "leftie" media and leftist are gloating about that error, and how you're more likely to threatened by Muslim extremist than by Christian extremists (which doesn't give much comfort to Breiviks victims or their family members, as I sure the same could be said for McVeigh's victims) and how leftist provide a indirect support for muslim terrorist along with such associated "problems" as homosexuality (I swear, read it yourself).

It also appears that our Super Freak did follow the update listed on Jennifer Rubin's page....for if he had read her follow up he would have noted that while Rubin cops to jumping the gun with everyone else, she goes to great lengths to remind everyone that the muslim terrorist are more likely to git ya than the blond Christian terrorist pointing to the Norwegian bust of a muslim terror cell link recently (as did Erickson).

Yeah, they did what I said they did....stubborn neocons who don't like to confuse their propaganda with contradictions and new information STILL wanted people to hold muslims as the REAL threat....signifying Breivik as some sort of nut job and freak happening. But since NO ONE was writing off Al Qaeda or muslim extremist, it seems the neocon pundits I cited were tilting at windmills as usual.
 
This is why for 10 years I've tried to teach neocon numbskulls to READ CAREFULLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY. I stated that the "still TRIED"....meaning past tense, meaning that they are NOT doing it now.

Furthermore, it appears that our Super Freak did not follow my forementioned instructions, as the links in post #30 CLEARLY show how Maulkin gives but a brief tweet regarding Breivik, but devotes numerous, redundant paragraphs about one major case of an islamic fundamentalist with ties to extremist acts and a few individual cases of crimes in Norway commited by muslims (but NOT connected to terrorism).

It also appears that our Super Freak did not READ the ENTIRE piece by Erickson, who while admitting he was (along with Al Jaazera and a host of US neocon pundits and conservative broadcasters and the MSM) wrong, goes off on a tangent exaggerated and distorted suppostion and conjecture as how (generalized) "leftie" media and leftist are gloating about that error, and how you're more likely to threatened by Muslim extremist than by Christian extremists (which doesn't give much comfort to Breiviks victims or their family members, as I sure the same could be said for McVeigh's victims) and how leftist provide a indirect support for muslim terrorist along with such associated "problems" as homosexuality (I swear, read it yourself).

It also appears that our Super Freak did follow the update listed on Jennifer Rubin's page....for if he had read her follow up he would have noted that while Rubin cops to jumping the gun with everyone else, she goes to great lengths to remind everyone that the muslim terrorist are more likely to git ya than the blond Christian terrorist pointing to the Norwegian bust of a muslim terror cell link recently (as did Erickson).

Yeah, they did what I said they did....stubborn neocons who don't like to confuse their propaganda with contradictions and new information STILL wanted people to hold muslims as the REAL threat....signifying Breivik as some sort of nut job and freak happening. But since NO ONE was writing off Al Qaeda or muslim extremist, it seems the neocon pundits I cited were tilting at windmills as usual.

Well.... as PROVEN by the post above, Taichi has once again demonstrated that he is an idiot.

Again, for our local moron Taichi.... NO ONE tried to link the EVENTS IN NORWAY with Islamic terrorists AFTER they knew who was responsible. NO ONE.

You are stretching beyond imagination to try and associate their comments to what you CLAIMED they did. Thanks for proving once again how moronic you truly are.
 
More sweeping generalization, in so many ways.

First, I don't support anyone's barbaric practices, whether we're talking about stoning or waterboarding.

Second, I don't libel an entire religion because of the crimes of the extremists.

then where the fuck are all the groans for your asshole comrades blaming Christians and Conservatives for the Norwegian massacre ????....

You're a hypocrite .....plain and simple .....its so obvious ....its ludicrous I have to point it out to you......


As a matter of fact, look over the exchange between TCLib and myself.....can you really agree with the ridiculous bullshit he spouts in his responses ?.....He gets the last word in only because his comebacks are so fuckin' stupid and meandering off the topic of the thread that it makes no sense to bother to keep engaging him in debate......

We just look at his shit and say to outselves..."We just cant't fix insanity".....hes like an annoying fly that cant' do you any harm but the only way to rid yourself of his annoying you is to swat the asshole....

hes pathetic and you're getting there....
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
This is why for 10 years I've tried to teach neocon numbskulls to READ CAREFULLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY. I stated that the "still TRIED"....meaning past tense, meaning that they are NOT doing it now.

Furthermore, it appears that our Super Freak did not follow my forementioned instructions, as the links in post #30 CLEARLY show how Maulkin gives but a brief tweet regarding Breivik, but devotes numerous, redundant paragraphs about one major case of an islamic fundamentalist with ties to extremist acts and a few individual cases of crimes in Norway commited by muslims (but NOT connected to terrorism).

It also appears that our Super Freak did not READ the ENTIRE piece by Erickson, who while admitting he was (along with Al Jaazera and a host of US neocon pundits and conservative broadcasters and the MSM) wrong, goes off on a tangent exaggerated and distorted suppostion and conjecture as how (generalized) "leftie" media and leftist are gloating about that error, and how you're more likely to threatened by Muslim extremist than by Christian extremists (which doesn't give much comfort to Breiviks victims or their family members, as I sure the same could be said for McVeigh's victims) and how leftist provide a indirect support for muslim terrorist along with such associated "problems" as homosexuality (I swear, read it yourself).

It also appears that our Super Freak did follow the update listed on Jennifer Rubin's page....for if he had read her follow up he would have noted that while Rubin cops to jumping the gun with everyone else, she goes to great lengths to remind everyone that the muslim terrorist are more likely to git ya than the blond Christian terrorist pointing to the Norwegian bust of a muslim terror cell link recently (as did Erickson).

Yeah, they did what I said they did....stubborn neocons who don't like to confuse their propaganda with contradictions and new information STILL wanted people to hold muslims as the REAL threat....signifying Breivik as some sort of nut job and freak happening. But since NO ONE was writing off Al Qaeda or muslim extremist, it seems the neocon pundits I cited were tilting at windmills as usual.


Well.... as PROVEN by the post above, Taichi has once again demonstrated that he is an idiot.

Wow....all the Super Freak has to come back with is some weak ass school yard retort. Someone tell this Super Freak(ing) fool that if you claim your accusation has been proven, it be nice to provide some fact based and logical PROOF. Let's see if the Super Freak(ing) fool can meet this simple burden of proof.

Again, for our local moron Taichi.... NO ONE tried to link the EVENTS IN NORWAY with Islamic terrorists AFTER they knew who was responsible. NO ONE.

See my previous response, folks. Our Super Freak(ing) stubborn neocon parrot just IGNORES what he doesn't like or cannot logically refute, and then squawks the same drivel in various forms ad nauseum.

You are stretching beyond imagination to try and associate their comments to what you CLAIMED they did. Thanks for proving once again how moronic you truly are.

And can the Super Freak(ing) neocon toadie logically and factually prove that what I pointed out regarding the 3 neocon pundits ramblings about muslims and Breivik is wrong? I chanllenge him to do so, because I can provide FULL AND COMPLETE QUOTES to back what I say. Can the Super Freak do the same. Let's see.
 
They'll never admit that Breivik is a Christian, or that they espouse the same views.
 
Breivik is a terrorist who happens to be a christian, he is not a Christian extremist.

Unlike the Muslim terrorists that attacked us on 911.
 


Originally Posted by christiefan915
More sweeping generalization, in so many ways.

First, I don't support anyone's barbaric practices, whether we're talking about stoning or waterboarding.

Second, I don't libel an entire religion because of the crimes of the extremists.

then where the fuck are all the groans for your asshole comrades blaming Christians and Conservatives for the Norwegian massacre ????....

You're a hypocrite .....plain and simple .....its so obvious ....its ludicrous I have to point it out to you......


As a matter of fact, look over the exchange between TCLib and myself.....can you really agree with the ridiculous bullshit he spouts in his responses ?.....He gets the last word in only because his comebacks are so fuckin' stupid and meandering off the topic of the thread that it makes no sense to bother to keep engaging him in debate......

We just look at his shit and say to outselves..."We just cant't fix insanity".....hes like an annoying fly that cant' do you any harm but the only way to rid yourself of his annoying you is to swat the asshole....

hes pathetic and you're getting there....

Post 69 puts this assholes Bravado in perspective, folks. Bravo is such an intellectual coward and dishonest little neocon cretin doesn't DARE take me on point for point for long. Instead, Bravo just compounds his demonstrated stupidity with more lies, distortions, exaggerations on a Bravado like scale. Whenever Bravo's intellectual capacity falls short of defending his beliefs and opinions, he vehemently substitutes his personal opinion, supposition and conjecture for facts and logic. As the chronology of the post shows, Bravo is either too damn dumb to keep up or too insipidly stubborn to admit he's wrong on any level. Christie just dropped kick his butt, and Bravo blows his stack with irrational rantings....not unexpected. Let's watch for more of the same from our barstool bound Bravo.
 
Back
Top