Elizabeth Warren

Bfgrn said:
WOW, it amazes me that conservatives want to hold liberals to a whole different set of rules than they hold Republicans or private sector folks. The truth is she was sticking up for the victims. The fact that she was paid for her expertise is not unusual, it is common business practice.
Click to expand...
She worked for travelers insurance, her efforts, according to the Boston globe( liberal newspaper), were disastrous for victims.
 
Bfgrn said:
WOW, it amazes me that conservatives want to hold liberals to a whole different set of rules than they hold Republicans or private sector folks. The truth is she was sticking up for the victims. The fact that she was paid for her expertise is not unusual, it is common business practice.
Click to expand...

Just insert the name "Romney" instead of her name and you'd see how utterly stupid his statement was.

How much money did Mitt give to the thousands he made big bucks off by firing them?
 
Bfgrn said:
WOW, it amazes me that conservatives want to hold liberals to a whole different set of rules than they hold Republicans or private sector folks. The truth is she was sticking up for the victims. The fact that she was paid for her expertise is not unusual, it is common business practice.
Click to expand...

Conservatives are very honest usually about the fact that they are more for themselves and are fine with making money. it's not conservatives that always run on populist notions and "sticking up for the little guy" I ask you to be consistent, if you actually care about the little guy you wouldn't accept large sums of money on his behalf and then use it to line your own pockets. talk the talk. walk the walk.
 
Howey said:
Just insert the name "Romney" instead of her name and you'd see how utterly stupid his statement was.

How much money did Mitt give to the thousands he made big bucks off by firing them?
Click to expand...

again, you fail to understand. Mitt romney didn't go around espousing populism and sticking up for the little guy. I ask people actually practice what they preach.
 
She worked for big insurance , capping payments to victims.
The liberal newspaper, ' The Boston Globe ' said her work was disastrous for victims .
 
007 said:
She worked for travelers insurance, her efforts, according to the Boston globe( liberal newspaper), were disastrous for victims.
Click to expand...

LIE!

Boston Globe, May 1: Travelers won most of what it wanted from the Supreme Court, and in doing so Warren helped preserve an element of bankruptcy law that ensured that victims of large-scale corporate malfeasance would have a better chance of getting compensated, even when the responsible companies go bankrupt.

http://factcheck.org/2012/10/warrens-role-in-asbestos-case/
 
A white moon's hot said:
Conservatives are very honest usually about the fact that they are more for themselves and are fine with making money. it's not conservatives that always run on populist notions and "sticking up for the little guy" I ask you to be consistent, if you actually care about the little guy you wouldn't accept large sums of money on his behalf and then use it to line your own pockets. talk the talk. walk the walk.
Click to expand...

At least you are honest who conservatives stand up (actually kneel for), but I wouldn't be proud of it...LMAO!

peasantsforplutocrats.jpg
 
A white moon's hot said:
Conservatives are very honest usually about the fact that they are more for themselves and are fine with making money. it's not conservatives that always run on populist notions and "sticking up for the little guy" I ask you to be consistent, if you actually care about the little guy you wouldn't accept large sums of money on his behalf and then use it to line your own pockets. talk the talk. walk the walk.
Click to expand...

At least you are honest who conservatives stand up (actually kneel) for, but I wouldn't be proud of it...LMAO!

peasantsforplutocrats.jpg
 
No, look further!
She was on travelers payroll long before the article you posted !!
 
007 said:
No, look further!
She was on travelers payroll long before the article you posted !!
Click to expand...

LIE AGAIN!!

Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown and challenger Elizabeth Warren are accusing each other of “not telling the truth.” Brown says Warren worked to “restrict payments” to asbestos victims, while Warren says she worked to “get more money” for them. We find Warren is correct; Brown’s ad is a distortion.

It may seem counter-intuitive that Warren’s work on behalf of an insurance company that covered an asbestos manufacturer could be work on the same side as the victims of the case. But Warren was brought in as a bankruptcy expert on a case before the Supreme Court to secure a $500 million trust to pay asbestos victims. As part of a settlement that Warren worked to preserve, the insurance company sought immunity from lawsuits in exchange for releasing the $500 million trust. Attorneys for most of the asbestos victims supported Warren’s efforts.

Warren’s version of the case has been publicly backed by several attorneys representing the asbestos victims, as well as leaders of an asbestos workers’ union.

“He’s flat out misrepresenting the facts,” Francis C. Boudrow, business manager for the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers Union, Local No. 6 told the Boston Globe. “It’s offensive to all these people who’ve lost lives” to asbestos-*related illness, he said.
 
A white moon's hot said:
I never followed campaign finance rules that closely but if you can contribute being out of the state that is fucked up. you shouldn't have a say in massachusetts representation.
Click to expand...

Hilarious. When Brown first won that seat from Coakley, he did it with a lot of tea party money from around the country a fact that was bragged about at the time by teapartiers.

Also, how many of his top donors are actually in Massachusetts?

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cid=N00031174&cycle=2012
 
Darla said:
Hilarious. When Brown first won that seat from Coakley, he did it with a lot of tea party money from around the country a fact that was bragged about at the time by teapartiers.

Also, how many of his top donors are actually in Massachusetts?

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cid=N00031174&cycle=2012
Click to expand...

i dont know why you try to use some other instance like now I am going to be completely change my tune. It was wrong for brown to do it as well. As you can see above, I literally JUST found out that out of state donations were allowed. So I don't know why you would smugly tell me brown got money too as if that makes it better.
 
A white moon's hot said:
i dont know why you try to use some other instance like now I am going to be completely change my tune. It was wrong for brown to do it as well. As you can see above, I literally JUST found out that out of state donations were allowed. So I don't know why you would smugly tell me brown got money too as if that makes it better.
Click to expand...

I donated to her and I am going to donate a lot more if she runs for President.
 
Bfgrn said:
LIE AGAIN!!

Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown and challenger Elizabeth Warren are accusing each other of “not telling the truth.” Brown says Warren worked to “restrict payments” to asbestos victims, while Warren says she worked to “get more money” for them. We find Warren is correct; Brown’s ad is a distortion.

It may seem counter-intuitive that Warren’s work on behalf of an insurance company that covered an asbestos manufacturer could be work on the same side as the victims of the case. But Warren was brought in as a bankruptcy expert on a case before the Supreme Court to secure a $500 million trust to pay asbestos victims. As part of a settlement that Warren worked to preserve, the insurance company sought immunity from lawsuits in exchange for releasing the $500 million trust. Attorneys for most of the asbestos victims supported Warren’s efforts.

Warren’s version of the case has been publicly backed by several attorneys representing the asbestos victims, as well as leaders of an asbestos workers’ union.

“He’s flat out misrepresenting the facts,” Francis C. Boudrow, business manager for the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers Union, Local No. 6 told the Boston Globe. “It’s offensive to all these people who’ve lost lives” to asbestos-*related illness, he said.
Click to expand...
Ah the union flip flopped!
They are fanatics, it's what they do!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top