Drudge: 1 JUDGE VOIDS 7,000,000 VOTERS...

I have. :) Do I also have the "right" to free heath care? After all, the Constitution says "Life".
haha.....and its the right to life freedom they use to kill unborn babies....
the right to bear arms is totally ignored with heavy regulation
and the right to free association is illegal because it shows bias or discrimination...
the circular logic is driving me nuts....

Come to America and get rich.....(then we will confiscate your money to give to others):pke:
 
Well, count the ones in Mass. So far I believe that it caused the earthquakes in Haiti and Chile... :D And that we'll soon be able to blame our next blizzard on those heathens.

Don't forget that they're also responsible for the floods in China and the forest fires in Russia.
 
Marriage has nothing to do with the Constitution...the Constitution neither condones/allows or bans marraiage in any way....queers can hold any ceremony in any location with anyone officiating and call themselves married for their own purposes...nobody cares.

The simple fact is...the government does not have to recognize this union for tax treatment or any other legality if they so desire nor do they have recognize any marriage if they so deem....

The queers and still view themselves married in their own eyes .....

what they really want is for all of us to condone their lifestyle and accept it over our particular moral value systems and religious views....

But the Government will recognize the unions and it will occur, within your lifetime.
 
Because queer marriage doesn't benefit society. And it forces society to tell kids that queer is normal moral natural and healthy- a lie.

Then we shouldn't allow movie stars to marry; because it forces society to tell kids that their marriages are normal, moral, natural, and healthy.
 
Covering ones 'partner' under an insurance plan is between the employee and employer....not the US government

Marriage is not a federal legal requirement for adoption is it....I really don't know the present law.

There are any number of legal documents to cover "medical situations" that can be entered into by anyone that wants to make such arrangements...

They want to be "normal" ? by being abnormal ?
Marriage has ALWAYS been defined as a union of man and women....
not man and man, women and women, man and monkey, women and horse, etc.....
We, so far refuse as a society, to be coerced into accepting pedophilia, bestiality, sadomasochism, or any number of other things as socially acceptable....but the side of perversion is winning the battle....what will be, will be.....

"Marriage has ALWAYS been defined as a union of man and women...."

At one time there was no definition as to how many wives one man could have.

And what about some of the Native American traditions, where someone being "different" and accepted?

Why do you hate the traditions of the Native Americans??
 
If crayons are wha you write with, then by all means knock yourself out.

But the Constitution guarantees "the pursuit of happiness", not happiness. Personally I'd be happy with three wives:
1. Real nerdy and smart, to make a living and support me;
2. One big and fat to cook for me;
3. One sexy and hot, to, well, you know.

3......to cheat on you!!
 
Absolutly right little girl....society has rules and government makes laws and we all live by agreed to regulations.....thats what a society does for its own good.....and one of those rules is NO to sex with minors....NO to rape....NO to sex with animals and NO to marriage between same sex people....
\Society draws the line where society draws the line.....tough shit.....you can't please everybody....
"Marriage" was NEVER recognized between same sex couples,....NEVER in this society anyway......even people other than homos have rights too....rights to determine as a society what is acceptable and what is NOT...
and you must have assumed it was you that made the rules we live by....think again....but you sure can continue to work to change those rules and others work to enforce those rules....

And at one time it said NO to marriage between the races; but then, like now, society smartened up and realized that bigots were trying to rule the US.

Same sex marriages are going to become legal and recognized, within your lifetime.
 
I do: its not. Why does the Constitution bother you now but not before?

If a Judge says the Healthcare law is unconstitutional I will not attack the judge for usirping the will of the people, I might disagree with his Constitutional analysis.
 
If crayons are wha you write with, then by all means knock yourself out.

But the Constitution guarantees "the pursuit of happiness", not happiness. Personally I'd be happy with three wives:
1. Real nerdy and smart, to make a living and support me;
2. One big and fat to cook for me;
3. One sexy and hot, to, well, you know.

I have no problem with legal bigomy as long as its not an abusive situation as happens in these cults.
 
I was surprised he put an injunction on his own ruling until it was decided by higher courts. I'm sure the 9th will uphold his decision, then the SCOTUS will battle it out. I expect a 5-4 decision in support of this ruling. (That's a prediction folks, an opinion on how the courts may rule not a personal opinion..., I've already told you what I think would be the right way to handle this.)
I agree, Kennedy will be the swing vote on this one and I believe he will rule with the 4 liberal justices to uphold the lower court's decision.
 
Marriage, okay, but civil unions should be hands off! Call it by another name, give them rights to become partners who have legal rights!

Why get hung up on a semantics! People want to pretend that marriage is some HOLY institution and then they run to Vegas to get a quickie divorce so they can marry the girl they have been cheating with since they last got married. It use to be a business deals between families! Woman were a piece of property that were traded like land or cattle, so give me a break on the institution of marriage and how it would be ruined by homosexuals be allowed to perform the action. It is a joke!
The funniest thing is, when the lawyer who argued in support of the ban was asked what harm gay marriage caused to heterosexual marriage he said, "I don't know your honor, I don't know." Great legal minds there on the right. Gotta love it.
 
Lets open the question up...

TO anyone here opposed to Gay Marriage...

What harm does it cause to Hetrosexual marriage?
 
Back
Top