Drudge: 1 JUDGE VOIDS 7,000,000 VOTERS...

Was he openly gay before he never discussed his sexual orientation?

357MagSM, you keep trying to make this about his sexual orientation, but you have no evidence whatsoever.

What you have is a penchant for trying to derail a discussion.

There is not one shred of evidence that this judge's sexual orientation had any bearing on his decision.
 
I think you'll find it is scientific fact that gays cannot maintain a state of rationality for more than a few seconds at a time. In this sense they are very much like ladies.

What we need are more straight men, such as SM, in positions of authority in order to ensure that rationality is maintained at all times. At all times, sir.
Well, that and the ever-present lisp is just annoying.
 
Funny how we was "openly gay" but never discussed his sexual orientation. Odd, really.

I'm glad you find it amusing. It is still irelevant to the topic.



Perhaps people knew him in private lives and there were rumors? Perhaps someone knew his partner. There are any number of ways people could know he was gay without him telling them.



As I asked you before, did every gay person you have ever known actually TELL you that they are gay?
 
Shit man make up your mind. :palm:

He never discussed it officially. But he lived his life as a gay man.

I notice you didn't answer my question. I guess if you had done that, you wouldn't have these tangents to go off on.
 
What possible difference could any of this make?

Youare grasping at straws, 357MagSM.
 
I like it. "The most powerful handgun in the world, and it will blow your head clean off, so you have to ask yourself, do you feel lucky."

Except it hasn't been the most powerful handgun in the world since 1956.
 
WhinerBornGay! :lol:

Except you know the reason I call you 357MagSM. From your claim that teh fact that the 357Magnum was the first cartridge named for its actual diameter, and the fact that you claimed that defeated my argument concerning the .308.

You remember, in the thread where you claimed that was a "zing", but it turned out to be an embarrassment?
 
Embarrassment for you despite your attempt to turn it around, WhinerBorn. :)

I didn't make a claim that turned out to be completely wrong. So wrong, in fact, that you had to invent comments that were supposedly made by a firearms manufacturing engineer.


Ready to get back to the topic yet? I know you have been getting thrashed there, but it always seems the proper thing to do.
 
Shit man make up your mind. :palm:
I don't discuss my sexual orientation. I just discuss sex and from that, and from the people I choose to have a relationship with you can deduce my sexual orientation. I don't have to say I am straight. You on the other hand must continually discuss being straight, mostly to convince yourself.
 
Back
Top