Does trump have a viable defense?

not even close to identical. Pence and Biden were identical acts

Neither Pence not Biden were CiC.

Obama took 33 million pages of documents, much of it classified. The National Archives PRAISED him for it. It only became a "crime" when Trump did it.

Simply because we have different laws for democrats than we do for enemies of the Reich.
 
Brilliant argument.

No, I played your game a little while, so I wish you would answer my questions.

It appears you agree that Trump is charged with very serious crimes. If they prove the allegations, do you think he has a defense?

Yet we have already seen that there is no investigation of Quid Pro. In fact the STASI under Wray is engaged in an active coverup of criminal acts by the Biden Cartel.

This sham indictment of Trump is part of the effort by Merrick Himmler to cover up the criminal acts of the Biden Crime Syndicate.
 
As I asked your fellow Nazi - are you suggesting that Trump went back after leaving office and took documents?

The National Archives has worked with every president prior to Trump on handling documents - and we circle right back to the 14th - Trump is subject to "laws" no other president has ever been subjected to.

The lust of the Nazi democrat Reich to "Get Trump" has forever ended the concept of law in America. No one can pretend that written law matters - "law" depends on what party one is in, or what group you fall into.

Are you unable to understand the what the word "retains" means?
or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

The only circle seems to be the jerk you are doing.
No other President has failed to comply with a subpoena. No other President has failed to return classified information when told to do so. Those are the acts that break the law.
 
Did the Communist Chinese agents that Joe Biden treated to looking through top secret documents in his garage have a security clearance?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/cla...ilmington-home-garage-white/story?id=96390141

I know, they gave Biden millions - and that's what counts.

Did Biden personally show them the documents? Did Biden know they were looking at the documents? Once again, we are back to the actual law which requires knowledge and intent before it is a crime. Something you seem to be completely ignorant of.
The willful intent requirment is why Hillary wasn't charged and why Trump would not have been charged if he had returned the documents when he was asked to. If Trump had returned the documents there would have been no crime to investigate and no involvement by the FBI.
 
Do you imagine people seek me out to give them defenses for their court cases? Are you a fucking dunce?

Not my issue. My issue is why you deny crimes by democrats. We know why. Why do you think everyone is as stupid as you are?

But you are sure in this case their is a valid defense. I understand.
 
But you are sure in this case their is a valid defense. I understand.

I never said valid you did. I said there is always a defense. Your assessment of it matters only to your mother. Probably not even with her. Why do you think everyone is as stupid as you are?
 
I never said valid you did. I said there is always a defense. Your assessment of it matters only to your mother. Probably not even with her. Why do you think everyone is as stupid as you are?

So do you think he has a valid defense?
 
Do you imagine people seek me out to give them defenses for their court cases? Are you a fucking dunce?

Not my issue. My issue is why you deny crimes by democrats. We know why. Why do you think everyone is as stupid as you are?

You got it backwards.

Dems and libz are not stupid. Look at how many and easily we prosecute top Repucliclowns and put them in jail, for doing nothing, as you guys say. Heck, even under a GOP POTUS and AG with a GOP head of the FBI, we see those repbliclowns going to jail by the boatload.


It is Repuubliclowns who are so painfully stupid, that you guys see all this obvious Dem criminality and you simply cannot indict any of it. You really need to reflect on that and how stupid that means you are. GOP investigations after investigation, Special Prosecutors, all getting NOTHING. It is as if a Dem could shoot some one in front of you idiots and you would be stuck sucking your thumb and unable to do a single prosecution.

Checkmate Republiclowns you are painfully stupid. You need to quit this game as you are outmatched. You have met your betters.
 
stg061123dAPR-800x0.jpg
 
Number of documents Trump showed to people that didn't have security clearance - at least 2 are included in the indictment.

Two, because they didn't need to look for any more. Those two are thoroughly documented, at LEAST one is literally on tape. I guarantee that two ijust scratches the surface.
 
Two, because they didn't need to look for any more. Those two are thoroughly documented, at LEAST one is literally on tape. I guarantee that two ijust scratches the surface.

General Petraeus only showed one document. I and he cooperated.
 

And if you have read the indictment, you should hope that the odds approach 100%. Everyone who voted for Trump is going to have to admit they made a mistake. Because there is incontrovertible evidence that Trump stole top secret classified documents, many of them speaking to our military capabilities and those of our allies. And we know he showed them to people who had no business seeing them. We also know that Jarod Kushner got 2 billion dollars from the Saudis. If you are not firmly for the conviction of Donald Truimp, you are anti-American. It's that simple. This isn't joking around a message board. What Trump did may very well get many people killed. Your dismissive response is, again IMHO, completely inappropriate. My two cents.
 
Back
Top