So tell us how did Harvard discriminate based on race, color, or national origin
Does Harvard have a right to taxpayer money?
- Thread starter Teflon Don
- Start date
This paper is a statistical analysis of the admission process at Harvard in reference to White and Asian students. It proves Asian students are discriminated against.
Asian American Discrimination in Harvard Admissions
These penalties against Asian Americans in the ratings also translate to penalties in admissions. Using whites as a base, our preferred model shows an average marginal effect −1 percentage point for being Asian American. This implies a 19% penalty given the admission rate for typical Asian Americans was slightly over 5% for the period we analyze. This admissions penalty is likely an understatement for the following reasons: (i) Asian Americans are stronger than whites on the observables associated with admission; and (ii) there is evidence of bias against Asian Americans in some of the other ratings that are included in the model.Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, 600 U.S. 181 (2023), is a landmark decision college admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Of course it is the point. It is precisely the point you were alluding to. Unless Congress specifically authorized spending to go to Harvard for a specific thing, then it is up to the Administration to dole it out at their discretion. That is how the system has worked for decades.
Sorry if you or Harvard doesn't like it, but Trump is following the law. When Congress appropriates funds, the purposefully leave it vague and up to the bureaucrats to run and distribute. You are fine with it when the bureaucrats agree with you. Now they don't and you huff and puff. Well tough shit.
Yakuda
Verified User
So.ykunavree with EVERYTHING you're party does. I'll remember that.
The question is "if" and you do not know enough information to support your claim. That is the point.
Yes. That one is particularly stupid. Entertaining though, as they get tripped up by their own propaganda.
When some idiot pretends its embarrassing posts are 'sarcasm' is pretty funny stuff, halfwit.
What's next, you going to set a Tesla on fire while wearing a gas soaked toilet paper clown suit?
How will you remember it after you sober up?
Citing a law doesn’t answer the question, the request was to show us how Harvard discriminated, cite what they actually did, what they are guilty of
Of course not, it's a perfectly valid concern when dealing with deranged deviant Democrats.
When dealing with your ilk and peer group violence is always a certainty. Democrats need to be deported as a terrorist group.
The people that set those fires voted for Trump, they were made because Elon abandoned them to go run DC
Let's see what real terrorism looks like...
These are people attacking the US Capitol for political reasons and attacking and injuring police officers.
lol you're just silly.
So you have nothing, just weird spin? Okay, we've already seen all that for decades now, gimp.
We do know it's not Democrats, because nobody tried to burn down the city, chase down teenage boys and try to rape and shoot them, and nobody threw fire bombs at police, except maybe the FBI undercovers. You're pretty sad.
Harvard lost the anti-discrimination law suit against them.
Who else would they be? They're your fellow deviants and commies. No use denying it.
Two years ago, so how is that relevant today?