Does Harvard have a right to taxpayer money?

Who else would they be? They're your fellow deviants and commies. No use denying it.
Musk hatters, last I knew many on the right hated Musk’s EV autos, or, any dimwit on the street, are all mass murderers automatically Republican because Republicans support freer gun laws
 
So you have nothing, just weird spin? Okay, we've already seen all that for decades now, gimp.

We do know it's not Democrats, because nobody tried to burn down the city, chase down teenage boys and try to rape and shoot them, and nobody threw fire bombs at police, except maybe the FBI undercovers. You're pretty sad.
I guess you are really confused because you think a Tesla is a city, a teenage boy, or a police officer.
 
Musk hatters, last I knew many on the right hated Musk’s EV autos,
Nothing in particular about Tesla. About EVs in general and the mandates for them.
If you want to waste your money on an EV, feel free. I won't buy one. They do not suit any of my needs in an automobile.
or, any dimwit on the street, are all mass murderers automatically Republican because Republicans support freer gun laws
A gun is not murder, anchovies. Redefinition fallacy.
 
At least 1 out of 12 'academics' will fake their data anyway. Some videos for the illiterate here on fake science, at Harvard and elsewhere.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsJvoNpFBA8
Fake data is a real problem. It's also known as an argument from randU fallacy. A randU is a random number thought up in someone's head (or an algorithm generating numbers thought up in someone's head).

Climate models on computers are just randU generators. Useless. There is no way to compare if the randU is anywhere correlated with weather on Earth because it's not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth or the global atmospheric concentration of CO2 of Earth.

There is nowhere near enough instrumentation to even begin a sensible statistical analysis of this type.

IF one were to use ALL the thermometers used by NASA and NOAA combined, AND spaced them uniformly (they aren't), AND read them simultaneously (the weather moves), then you would get one thermometer for an area about the size of Virginia.

The resulting margin of error is greater than the highest and lowest temperatures ever measured, so they become the fence. In other words, mathematically, they are guessing (and THAT's only considering the surface, ignoring the temperature of any ocean depth, underground, or in the air!)
 
Back
Top