Moronic analogy as is the thread's attempt to make this out to be some startling criminal event.
Does anyone support getting 'Opposition Info' from Russia, China, Israel, Saudi, ...
- Thread starter Jack
- Start date
Moronic analogy as is the thread's attempt to make this out to be some startling criminal event.
....and used to spy on Trump's campaign. Where's the outrage JackOff?
What laws prevent campaigns from getting dirt on their opposition from ANY source? Show it to me. I can't seem to find it. Were you this butt-hurt finding out that Hillary PAID for salacious intel from Russian sources that was used to spy on the Trump campaign?
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Donald Trump confessing that he would accept dirt on political opponents from adversarial countries is actually a sign that he is guilty of it, and trying to somehow justify it.
It is also a sign that he may very well be doing it again.
Here is the deal- if Donald Trump truly did not know what he was doing was wrong or that it was against the law, he would never had tried to cover it up, and then lie about it to the American people.
Good people that don't do anything wrong- do not have to lie about anything or cover anything up!
This is something that all 5th graders know and understand!
It is also a sign that he may very well be doing it again.
Here is the deal- if Donald Trump truly did not know what he was doing was wrong or that it was against the law, he would never had tried to cover it up, and then lie about it to the American people.
Good people that don't do anything wrong- do not have to lie about anything or cover anything up!
This is something that all 5th graders know and understand!
How is he a narcissist? Do idiots on the left even know the definition? Watch a Trump speech contrasted with an Obama speech. With Obama it is all about him. Trump, it's all about the country.
Grow a fucking brain if that is even possible. I grow weary of low IQ assholes spouting off lies about Trump every damned day.
Absurdity; a sure sign of the last desperate refuge for liars, fools and ignorance; and those who have lost their arguments. Yay you!
Ironic coming from a pathological liar. Trump is the most open book transparent person to ever sit in the White House. Obama, not so much.
FACT snowflake. But I get it that lying leftist dunces like you hate those.
FACT snowflake. But I get it that lying leftist dunces like you hate those.
There you go with the pathological lying stupidity again. Can't seem to help yourself.
FACT. But we understand you hate facts.
Steele himself went to the FBI with the information. McCain turned it over. So far, everyone we know, except Trump has handled things in the proper fashion.
Sen. Mark Warner, the top DEMOCRAT on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional investigation into President Trump's alleged ties to Russia, had extensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages.
"We have so much to discuss u need to be careful but we can help our country," Warner texted the lobbyist, Adam Waldman, on March 22, 2017.
"I'm in," Waldman, whose firm has ties to Hillary Clinton, texted back to Warner.
Secrecy seemed very important to Warner as the conversation with Waldman heated up March 29, when the lobbyist revealed that Steele wanted a bipartisan letter from Warner and the committee’s chairman, North Carolina Republican Sen. Richard Burr, inviting him to talk to the Senate intelligence panel.
Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages.
The conversation about Steele started on March 16, 2017, when Waldman texted, "Chris Steele asked me to call you."
Warner responded, "Will call tomorrow be careful."
The records show Warner and Waldman had trouble connecting by phone. On March 20, Warner pressed Waldman by text to get him access to Steele.
"Can you talk tomorrow want to get with ur English friend," Warner texted.
An aide to Warner confirmed that the text messages are authentic.
Waldman, who did not return calls seeking comments, runs the Endeavor Group in Washington.
Waldman is best known for signing a $40,000 monthly retainer in 2009 and 2010 to lobby the U.S. government on behalf of Russian billionaire Oleg V. Deripaska. Deripraska had his visa revoked by the State Department in 2006 because of charges, which he has denied, that he has organized crime ties.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-sen-mark-warner-texted-with-russian-oligarch-lobbyist-in-effort-to-contact-dossier-author-christopher-steele
"We have so much to discuss u need to be careful but we can help our country," Warner texted the lobbyist, Adam Waldman, on March 22, 2017.
"I'm in," Waldman, whose firm has ties to Hillary Clinton, texted back to Warner.
Secrecy seemed very important to Warner as the conversation with Waldman heated up March 29, when the lobbyist revealed that Steele wanted a bipartisan letter from Warner and the committee’s chairman, North Carolina Republican Sen. Richard Burr, inviting him to talk to the Senate intelligence panel.
Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages.
The conversation about Steele started on March 16, 2017, when Waldman texted, "Chris Steele asked me to call you."
Warner responded, "Will call tomorrow be careful."
The records show Warner and Waldman had trouble connecting by phone. On March 20, Warner pressed Waldman by text to get him access to Steele.
"Can you talk tomorrow want to get with ur English friend," Warner texted.
An aide to Warner confirmed that the text messages are authentic.
Waldman, who did not return calls seeking comments, runs the Endeavor Group in Washington.
Waldman is best known for signing a $40,000 monthly retainer in 2009 and 2010 to lobby the U.S. government on behalf of Russian billionaire Oleg V. Deripaska. Deripraska had his visa revoked by the State Department in 2006 because of charges, which he has denied, that he has organized crime ties.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-sen-mark-warner-texted-with-russian-oligarch-lobbyist-in-effort-to-contact-dossier-author-christopher-steele
Listening to the media right now. It's hysterical. "OOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHH Trump's breaking the laaaawwwwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!!"
Perfect. They're hanging themselves on their own petard when they have to agree that Hillbag broke the law!
How many times do the facts have to be explained, Hillary's campaign hired a lawyer who hired a firm who were working for Republicans who hired an individual who went to Russians contacts for information. In comparison, the Trump campaign went right to Russian contacts, met them directly, seeking any help they could offer, invited them into America's election
And now you are going to tell us it is the same thing?
How many drugs do you do a day? Seriously. Just list the big ones.
It's ok anyway. I don't care that hrc paid for that Steele dossier. Politics is dirty, messy and evil. It's what they do.
What I care about is that's what started the fbi, then mueller witch hunt.
That's what the Dems, Dem pols and media should think. LOL!
The only time getting dirt from foreigners became wrong began in 2016. Gee...go figure.
Totally missing the point, ignoring it would probably be a better explanation
To begin, a foreign nation antagonistic toward the US orchestrated an espionage effort to influence the American election, fact. At the same time, this same nation had over one hundred documented direct contacts with one particular campaign, which that campaign kept secret and not only accepted but solicited, another fact
Trump, who refuses to believe either fact, now tell us he sees nothing wrong with getting foreign aid in elections, in other words, having a hostile nation, say Iran or North Korea, having a say in how we select our leaders. And Trumpkins here are telling us that that is perfectly copacetic
And what makes it all suspicious is that Mitch is holding up funds aimed at election security in 2020, and we all know that billy Barr would have no problem or do anything if any nation came along to help Trump get elected, while at the same time Trump is kissing autocrats asses all over the world. And now he tells us there is no problem taking aid from a foreign nation to get elected. Suspicious?
