Do you think they have much on Comey?

[Dutch Uncle]

I don't think MTG would be willing to incriminate Trump. Seriously, I think she'd be less likely to than Trump himself.

Not intentionally, but she's pretty passionate about releasing the files. If she backed off now, wouldn't that look bad for Trump?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

It will be interesting to see who is willing to put their career on the line for a loser case.

Just the sycophants and those smart enough to avoid prison.

Will Trump issue blanket pardons for his entire cabinet the day he leaves office? Sooner?

 

[FastLane]

For the crew that were talking about "lawfare" all through Biden's admin:

Do you have anything from Biden - a tweet, a speech, an interview, any comment - where he's pressuring the DOJ in a similar manner to what we have seen from Trump repetitively in tweets, speeches and interviews about Comey and others?

So you actually think that the DOJ raided the home of an ex President and put Jack Smith on him without Presidential approval first. Or perhaps even wave Trump's executive privilege . Yeah sure.

Risky move: Biden undercuts WH executive privilege shield​

 

[Jarod]

So you actually think that the DOJ raided the home of an ex President and put Jack Smith on him without Presidential approval first. Or perhaps even wave Trump's executive privilege . Yeah sure.

Risky move: Biden undercuts WH executive privilege shield​

Why do you keep refusing to answer my question about evidence that Comey authorized a leak?

You said he admitted it on video, where?

 

[BartenderElite]

So you actually think that the DOJ raided the home of an ex President and put Jack Smith on him without Presidential approval first. Or perhaps even wave Trump's executive privilege . Yeah sure.

Risky move: Biden undercuts WH executive privilege shield​

Thanks for admitting that there are no public comments from Biden that come close to matching Trump's pressure campaign on the DOJ.

 

[zymurgy]

An indictment is one thing, but a conviction is a complete other matter.

yet the retard was 100% positive about it

derp derp derpity derp

 

[Earl]

The evidence is what it is. We are not privy to it. It was sufficient to cause a Grand Jury to indict him.

If he is not convicted, his bank account will be considerably less.

 

[zymurgy]

The evidence is what it is. We are not privy to it. It was sufficient to cause a Grand Jury to indict him.

If he is not convicted, his bank account will be considerably less.

Liary Rotten must be super conflicted right now

 

[BartenderElite]

The evidence is what it is. We are not privy to it. It was sufficient to cause a Grand Jury to indict him.

If he is not convicted, his bank account will be considerably less.

And you support hurting people financially if they're innocent?

 

[Matt Dillon]

Comey's "fuck you" to trump was awesome after the indicted announcement:

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/-ddmP0dMiiQ?si=TnujYjn_PzomNgqN

Is his daughter kicked out of our government yet? They're 2 corrupt scumbags, he already lied under oath.

 

[Earl]

And you support hurting people financially if they're innocent?

Yes, especially after Comey bankrupted Gen. Flynn.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Why do you keep refusing to answer my question about evidence that Comey authorized a leak?

You said he admitted it on video, where?

All MAGAts are demented, dumb and/or dishonest White Nationalists who support destroying our Republic. They will not survive the civil war. Most, I suspect, will be shot in the back of the head by neighbors and family since they are evil.

As per their dishonest and evil nature, MAGAts spin lies with half-truths and outright fabrications. This case is 100% harassment and Trumpian vengeance.

The 2020 Senate testimony that led to charges against ex-FBI chief Comey

Prosecutors alleged Comey made false statements when he stood behind 2017 Senate testimony.

www.reuters.com

 

[BartenderElite]

Yes, especially after Comey bankrupted Gen. Flynn.

That's quite an admission.

I would never support that, because it's morally wrong.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

And you support hurting people financially if they're innocent?

He's a lowlife MAGAt traitor. Of course, he supports that action as a White Nationalist supporter.

 

[LurchAddams]

I surmised long ago that he's protecting someone and could not imagine why. Maybe one of his kids is on the list...

Honestly, I think if that were the case, someone inside the trump administration or Comey's daughter, who prosecuted Epstein, and trump then fired would have talked.

I don't think that would stay under wraps, especially since Jr.'s was screaming for the files' release until daddy said, "shhh!".

Did Donald Trump Jr. once post, 'Show us all the Epstein client list' and ask why those on it would be protected?

U.S. President Donald Trump's eldest son added, "Ask yourselves this question daily and the answer becomes very apparent!!"

www.snopes.com

"Donald Trump Jr. authentically tweeted in July 2023, "Show us all the Epstein client list now!!! Why would anyone protect those scum bags? Ask yourselves this question daily and the answer becomes very apparent!!"

 

[Earl]

That's quite an admission.

I would never support that, because it's morally wrong.

You did not object when Comey helped bankrupt Gen. Flynn.

The far left fired the first shot. We don’t know what the evidence is against Comey.

It was sufficient to cause the Grand Jury to convict him.

The far left loons start a fight and scream when their opponent fights back.

 

[LurchAddams]

i am not even saying McCabe did anything wrong, as there is doubt there too.

What i am saying is 'he said, he or she said' disputes are amongst the hardest cases to get a jury to a conclusion on 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. It almost always requires substantial other fact points or investigations pointing to who is lying, for a jury to get there.

In this case the most substantial fact point we know of is the IG Investigation which basically affirmed Comey's credibly in his account while saying they had doubts over McCabe's.

So when the jury hears that and reads that Investigation report, how that would not give them doubt, seems beyond impossible.

My understanding is that there are two counts, 1. Lying to Congress (harder to prove); 2. Obstruction of Justice, which is easier to prove, but will a jury indict? I understand trump is shopping for a friendlier trial venue outside of metro DC. It's a total railroad attempt, that like I say, will blow up in trump's face like that Russian hooker's bladder did.

 

[LurchAddams]

You did not object when Comey helped bankrupt Gen, Flynn.

General Flynn shouldn't have been working with the Russians, or failing to declare he was a foreign agent.

The far left fired first shot. We don’t know what the evidence is against Comey.

This not a war. This is about justice. Your problem is that justice only serves you if it persecutes your enemies you sorry trumptard.

 

[Earl]

Comey should not have lied to Congress and obstructed justice.

He should have prosecuted Hillary. He said she was guilty of not securing classified documents.

 

[FastLane]

Why do you keep refusing to answer my question about evidence that Comey authorized a leak?

You said he admitted it on video, where?

They have more than one source that said Comey lied when he said he didn't leak information. McCabe and Daniel Richman both say Comey authorized them to leak to the press. Comey lied to Congress twice when he said he didn't leak information out to the press.