Do you think that this is a good idea?

Do you think that this is a good idea?


  • Total voters
    7
  • Poll closed .
I don't give a fuck what the OP thinks of Trump. He asked us a question. And I gladly answered and got ridiculed by a retard.

How is this an answer to the op or the question, you fucking loon??

Trump isn't the King of England.

095ea45e2311cd42867eb1923bf858c3.gif
 
As much as I'd like to see the rise of more than just 2 viable parties in American politics, the current system usually requires running as a Republican or Democrat in order to win.

The only way we'll get more than 2 viable parties in our political system is to implement approval voting, instant runoff voting, or single transferable votes. All of those are alternative voting systems that allow third party votes to be more than just "spoiler votes."
 
As much as I'd like to see the rise of more than just 2 viable parties in American politics, the current system usually requires running as a Republican or Democrat in order to win.

The only way we'll get more than 2 viable parties in our political system is to implement approval voting, instant runoff voting, or single transferable votes. All of those are alternative voting systems that allow third party votes to be more than just "spoiler votes."

See? Even he gets it.
 
Did I say that you said it or implied it?

You asked us a question. You asked us if we think this is a good idea or not. I think it isn't a good idea because it gives Trump the appearance of being the King of America. Also it gives the appearance that we are going to have a new Party.

your party's there. it's a wart on the lion's ass. just a bunch of cells...

our body politic, our choice...politic.
 
As much as I'd like to see the rise of more than just 2 viable parties in American politics, the current system usually requires running as a Republican or Democrat in order to win.

The only way we'll get more than 2 viable parties in our political system is to implement approval voting, instant runoff voting, or single transferable votes. All of those are alternative voting systems that allow third party votes to be more than just "spoiler votes."

Donald Trump has destroyed both parties.
 
The only person being mocked is you.

I have not once claimed that you mentioned King or England or that you implied it.

Untrue and this is just another example of you throwing a hissy fit, over having your ass kicked. :D

Therefore there was no reason or logic behind your post, so you are being mocked for being an idiot. :good4u:
 
The way to win national elections is not ignore significant segments of voters.

Democrats lost in 2016 because they finally didn’t get away with ignoring the working class. You’re right that Trump doesn’t give a rats ass about Democrats—because he shouldn’t. What he should give a crap about are those Democrats that are being left behind by their own party.

It's long past the time to blame Hillary for anything. When trump was elected president it became his duty to care about all citizens, not just his base.
 
Donald Trump has destroyed both parties.

He's definitely changed a lot of the political paradigm, but it's similar to the previous occurrences in American history where the parties shifted in priorities.

I would argue Trump has made the GOP more of a populist party. Because of this, he doesn't need to run as a third party or independent candidate. Also, he's raised a ton of money for the GOP lately, so I don't think he'd want to run against a candidate funded by the money he himself helped to raise.
 
He's definitely changed a lot of the political paradigm, but it's similar to the previous occurrences in American history where the parties shifted in priorities.

I would argue Trump has made the GOP more of a populist party. Because of this, he doesn't need to run as a third party or independent candidate. Also, he's raised a ton of money for the GOP lately, so I don't think he'd want to run against a candidate funded by the money he himself helped to raise.

It is similar, tho I viewed Trump as a 3rd party candidate running as a repub. :thup: He learned from Perot's mistake.

Everyone dismisses our 3rd parties as weak and worthless. Except when it's a close election, then the loser always blames 3rd party voters. Despite their small size, 3rd parties are much much more powerful in our country than they are ever given credit for. They often can influence the direction of the two major parties, as well as even decide which one wins.
 
It's long past the time to blame Hillary for anything. When trump was elected president it became his duty to care about all citizens, not just his base.

Yeah, we saw how much Obama and the Party of the Jackass cares about Conservatives. STFU you pathetic hypocrite.
 
It is similar, tho I viewed Trump as a 3rd party candidate running as a repub. :thup: He learned from Perot's mistake.

Everyone dismisses our 3rd parties as weak and worthless. Except when it's a close election, then the loser always blames 3rd party voters. Despite their small size, 3rd parties are much much more powerful in our country than they are ever given credit for. They often can influence the direction of the two major parties, as well as even decide which one wins.

True, but I'd argue Trump's strategy is very effective, mostly because he essentially made one party change to fit his priorities. That's easier than building a party from the ground up.

Bernie seems to be attempting the same thing in the Democratic party.
 
True, but I'd argue Trump's strategy is very effective, mostly because he essentially made one party change to fit his priorities.

How did the Republican Party change? What does Trump believe that are not in line with the Republican Party ideology?

The ONLY major difference between Trump and previous milk toast Republicans is he can afford to take on the DC deep state. We need more like him.
 
Back
Top