floridafan
Verified User
you could start a thread where you prove the documents aren't Trumps documents.......if you had any proof they weren't Trumps.......
Are the 100 or so top secret documents belonging to Trump or the government.
you could start a thread where you prove the documents aren't Trumps documents.......if you had any proof they weren't Trumps.......
The Trump Organization is facing a criminal trial. It must include there man who name is on the title.
Are the 100 or so top secret documents belonging to Trump or the government.
and yet there is NO indictment of the man who's name is on the title and two lib'rul prosecutors resigned when they found out they weren't going to be able to prosecute Trump.......
Bull shit. If a declassified document isn't so marked, no one would ever know what documents would be classified.
that's what the courts are going to have to decide......got any evidence you want to share.......didn't think so.....
who needs to know?.....it's been declassified......
Its been done, dont play games, sweetie.
Well the judge just asked trumps legal team too prove docs were declassified. Watch what happens, sweets
There is no employee of that organization will will take the fall for trump. Everything they did was by his direction.
Stay tuned idiot. And yes the word idiot applies to any cocksucker like you who supports trump not only stealing top secret documents, but keeping them in plain site on his desk. No President in our history ha ever done that.
Absurdity; the last desperate refuge for the ignorant, the dishonest and the stupid. Yay you!
can you tell us whether the SC has in the past said that the president has the final authority to declassify documents........then can you tell us whether the law requires anything on the part of the president in the act of doing so..........if you can provide proof of anything in support of what you claim you may have a relevant argument........
dude.....an employee of the Trump organization has been indicted for lying on his personal tax return........are you stupid enough to think Trump is responsible for that?.....
it is sad how desperate you are to convict Trump of something........
' a convicted felon can run for president in the United States of America. The U.S. Constitution does not prevent a felon from running for the office of the President. What becomes interesting is whether they are able to handle the political fallout of running from or after spending time in prison, although this has become seemingly less of an issue in modern times.
There are very limited requirements when running for Presidential election, which are listed below:
The candidate contesting for the position must be a natural-born citizen of the United States of America.
The candidate must be 35 years or older.
The candidate should be a US resident for 14 years.'
It isn't to prevent him from running for office then.
Can a candidate run his campaign from jail ?
Yes, a candidate can run his campaign from jail. He won't be attending any rallies but he can still run for office.
And should he win- can he pardon himself ?
There is nothing that says he can't pardon himself for Federal crimes. But that doesn't protect him from state crimes or civil lawsuits. For instance, he could pardon himself for tax fraud but the IRS could still file a civil lawsuit for back taxes and he can't pardon himself from having to pay back taxes if a court rules he owes them
Here's Trump's latest bullshit. He can 'declassify' documents by just thinking about them. Do you believe him?
Trump’s claim of declassifying documents ‘by thinking about it’ is mocked by legal experts
Former President Trump says he could declassify documents just “by thinking about it” — an outlandish claim that drew howls of outrage from legal experts.
Speaking to Fox News’s Sean Hannity, Trump asserted there is no need for the president to formally declassify documents or even notify anyone that he has done so.
“If you’re the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying, ‘It’s declassified,’ even by thinking about it,” Trump said.
![]()
“There can be a process, but there doesn’t have to be,” he added. “You’re the president. You make that decision.”
Trump is scrambling to find a legally viable defense to the investigation into mishandling top secret documents that led to the Aug. 8 search of his Mar-a-Lago Florida resort.
He apparently believes one defense could be that the documents were no longer classified because he says so.
But experts vigorously dispute that, noting that he has never provided any evidence that he declassified them before leaving the White House.
“I tried not to burst out laughing,” said Bradley P. Moss, a national security lawyer.
A three-judge federal appeals court panel, including two Trump-appointed justices, trashed Trump’s claim Wednesday night, saying documents that are marked as classified are considered classified unless there is evidence they have been declassified.