Yes, it does. The accumulation of business decisions throughout an economic quarter are reflected in the GDP.
Ah, but not caused by GDP.
Yes, it does. The accumulation of business decisions throughout an economic quarter are reflected in the GDP.
Your ignorance knows no bounds
Ah, but not caused by GDP.
They are the causes of GDP, you idiot.
GDP doesn't dictate business decisions, it's the result of business decisions, you goober.
No shit.
Are they?
Because according to Tax Foundation, the rate of revenue growth for 2018 was less than 1%.
So when you argued before that it did, was that just you trolling?
Um, GDP means a lot more to the average worker (employment, wages, benefits) than the DJIA.
Nope. Wrong. Tax cuts reduce revenues and create deficits, like what happened after the Bush Tax Cuts.
So...why no wage or benefit increases in 2018, then?
The GOP tax bill only gave workers 2 cents more per hour in bonuses
https://www.vox.com/2018/12/18/18144509/tax-cut-bill-workers-bonus
So there goes your shit argument, cawacko.
I didn't argue that before you lying leftist. Here is what I posted (aka me doing your homework for you):
stated that when GDP is healthy, workers have already benefited from higher employment numbers, wages, and benefits.
GDP has nothing to do with direct business decisions. And it's not even that great an indicator of the state of the economy, either.
Yes, it does. The accumulation of business decisions throughout an economic quarter are reflected in the GDP.
I didn't argue that before you lying leftist. Here is what I posted (aka me doing your homework for you):
So that's just part of the discussion...the part you leave out is this exchange:
So you changed your argument from saying GDP benefits workers, then I said that GDP has nothing to do with that, then you said it did, then I said it didn't, then you agreed with me that it didn't.
That's really great for all of you who just got in the market last month ...
Want to try again ...
You said the Russia Tax Cut would lead to increased wages and growth because of the tax cut.
It didn't.
Reconcile that.
Idiot, your full quote ended with "And it's not even that great an indicator of the state of the economy, ether." Since that is what I was talking about, that is what I responded to.
That includes the wages of the 1%, which have grown more than everyone else's, which is why the growth rate is 3.1%.
Show me that chart without the wages of the 1%.
This idiot thinks the 1% earn wages. 