DJI has gone up nearly 2000 points in the last month

Are they?

Because according to Tax Foundation, the rate of revenue growth for 2018 was less than 1%.

Tax Revenue is higher by $12.7 billion. How is that a decrease? So the tax reduction act didn't actually reduce revenues like you said dumb fuck.
 
Nope. Wrong. Tax cuts reduce revenues and create deficits, like what happened after the Bush Tax Cuts.

Lying again I see. Tax revenues are higher than last year you dumb fuck. We don't have a revenue problem; we have a SPENDING problem. If you had a brain, which you obviously do not, you could comprehend the FACTS.
 
So...why no wage or benefit increases in 2018, then?

The GOP tax bill only gave workers 2 cents more per hour in bonuses
https://www.vox.com/2018/12/18/18144509/tax-cut-bill-workers-bonus

So there goes your shit argument, cawacko.

Dumb fuck:

Wages and salaries jump by 3.1%, highest level in a decade

Wages and salaries rose 3.1 percent in the third quarter, the biggest increase in a decade, according to the Labor Department.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/31/wag...3point1percent-highest-level-in-a-decade.html
 
I didn't argue that before you lying leftist. Here is what I posted (aka me doing your homework for you):

So that's just part of the discussion...the part you leave out is this exchange:

stated that when GDP is healthy, workers have already benefited from higher employment numbers, wages, and benefits.

GDP has nothing to do with direct business decisions. And it's not even that great an indicator of the state of the economy, either.

Yes, it does. The accumulation of business decisions throughout an economic quarter are reflected in the GDP.

So you changed your argument from saying GDP benefits workers, then I said that GDP has nothing to do with that, then you said it did, then I said it didn't, then you agreed with me that it didn't.
 
I didn't argue that before you lying leftist. Here is what I posted (aka me doing your homework for you):

And you agreed with me that it didn't because you admitted that GDP is the result of business decisions, not the driver of them.

So you changed your argument halfway through because you're an idiot.
 
_104149959_uswagesgrowth-nc.png


US wage growth hits nine-year high
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46072979
 
So that's just part of the discussion...the part you leave out is this exchange:







So you changed your argument from saying GDP benefits workers, then I said that GDP has nothing to do with that, then you said it did, then I said it didn't, then you agreed with me that it didn't.

Idiot, your full quote ended with "And it's not even that great an indicator of the state of the economy, ether." Since that is what I was talking about, that is what I responded to.

So, please stop lying (yeah, I know you won't).
 
Idiot, your full quote ended with "And it's not even that great an indicator of the state of the economy, ether." Since that is what I was talking about, that is what I responded to.

Nope. Nice try. We both know that wasn't your intent. Your intent was to say that GDP growth benefits workers, and I said that it doesn't. Then you preceded to argue it did, before changing your position to align with mine, which accurately states GDP is the result of business decisions, not the driver.

My point was that GDP growth doesn't benefit workers, but market growth does.

Sit. Down.
 
Back
Top