DJI has gone up nearly 2000 points in the last month

That's because you are an idiot, and have it backwards. The GDP represents the conditions of the economy, such as those economic realities of jobs/employment.

No business makes decisions based on the GDP growth rate.

None.

But businesses make plenty of decisions based on their share price.
 
Apple are about to initiate a massive stock buyback, that should be a shot of adrenaline to the DJI

But that's not what you all promised.

You all promised wage increases of $4,000-$9,000.

You all promised the tax cut would pay for itself.

You all promised companies wouldn't take their after-tax profits and just buyback stock.

You all made promises you couldn't keep.
 
No business makes decisions based on the GDP growth rate.

None.

But businesses make plenty of decisions based on their share price.

giphy.gif
 
But that's not what you all promised.

You all promised wage increases of $4,000-$9,000.

You all promised the tax cut would pay for itself.

You all promised companies wouldn't take their after-tax profits and just buyback stock.

You all made promises you couldn't keep.

giphy.gif
 
No business makes decisions based on the GDP growth rate.

None.

But businesses make plenty of decisions based on their share price.

That's because you don't understand GDP, and a single stock is not representative of the index it is listed under.
 
But that's not what you all promised.

You all promised wage increases of $4,000-$9,000.

You all promised the tax cut would pay for itself.

You all promised companies wouldn't take their after-tax profits and just buyback stock.

You all made promises you couldn't keep.

Tax revenues are up, along with spending. Take-home pay is increased after the tax reductions.
 
Tax revenues are up

Are they?

Because according to Tax Foundation, the rate of revenue growth for 2018 was less than 1%.

And tax revenues grow every year. The only years they don't are during recessions, and immediately after tax cuts...like what happened from 2001-2004.
 
Are they?

Because according to Tax Foundation, the rate of revenue growth for 2018 was less than 1%.

And tax revenues grow every year. The only years they don't are during recessions, and immediately after tax cuts...like what happened from 2001-2004.

Revenues were up after those tax cuts, as well. They just couldn't keep up with the rate of increased spending, just as now.
 
No, you don't understand GDP.

You seem to think it directly impacts business decisions...it doesn't. The share price does.

I have given you multiple opportunities to quote where I stated this. You should quit your lying. I stated that when GDP is healthy, workers have already benefited from higher employment numbers, wages, and benefits.
 
I have given you multiple opportunities to quote where I stated this. You should quit your lying. I stated that when GDP is healthy, workers have already benefited from higher employment numbers, wages, and benefits.

Exactly. When growth is strong and workers are in demand workers are in a much better position to receive wage and benefits increases.
 
Revenues were up after those tax cuts, as well.

Not really...and not when placed in the context of other years.

Tax revenue usually rises each year anyway...what we are talking about is the rate at which it rises. In some cases, after tax cuts, revenue is reduced (as it was from 2001-2004), or revenue growth is reduced to a rate below inflation (1% for 2018)


hey just couldn't keep up with the rate of increased spending, just as now.

Nope. Wrong. Tax cuts reduce revenues and create deficits, like what happened after the Bush Tax Cuts.
 
I have given you multiple opportunities to quote where I stated this. You should quit your lying. I stated that when GDP is healthy, workers have already benefited from higher employment numbers, wages, and benefits.

GDP has nothing to do with direct business decisions. And it's not even that great an indicator of the state of the economy, either.
 
GDP has nothing to do with direct business decisions. And it's not even that great an indicator of the state of the economy, either.

Yes, it does. The accumulation of business decisions throughout an economic quarter are reflected in the GDP.
 
So...why no wage or benefit increases in 2018, then?

The GOP tax bill only gave workers 2 cents more per hour in bonuses
https://www.vox.com/2018/12/18/18144509/tax-cut-bill-workers-bonus

So there goes your shit argument, cawacko.

From your own link you mental fucking midget.

The left-leaning Economic Policy Institute recently crunched compensation data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, showing that the much-touted bonuses did little to boost workers’ paychecks. In the past 12 months, cash bonuses only gave workers an extra 2 cents in average hourly compensation, adjusted for inflation. (This does not include bonuses tied to productivity goals.)
 
Great!

Too bad GDP means nothing to the average worker, whose 401k's saw no growth last year thanks to your shitty Russia Tax Cut.

You should strive to be more than just average. You should strive to not be a failure. Average would be an improvement for you.
 
Back
Top