Dixie, you sure have been quiet about the meltdown of your canidate Cain... Whatsup?

Jarod said:
Bump.. I thought you dident make a prediction.... "I like his odds" sounds like a prediction too me...
Click to expand...

Well, Jughead, the latest poll shows Newt Gingrich is the front-runner, and Cain is third, behind Romney. There is still plenty of time left until the primary voters cast their ballots, and at this exact same point in time last election, it was almost a sure thing we'd see Rudy vs. Hillary for the presidency. So if you want to bump my 'prediction' (not a prediction) from now until next November, I am fine with it.

One thing I think you and many other morons might be overlooking, is other things that have happened, besides the sex-scandal freakshow... since then, we've had Cain's 'moment' on Libya. I know this seems trivial, but I actually think that hurt him more than the fake sex scandal stuff. In any event, he hasn't "gone down like the Titanic" as you and The Dud were 'predicting' the other day. He's not like Anthony Weiner or Jerry Sandusky, where 90% of America disproves.
 
I never believed Rudy or Hillary would be the nominee.

I never said Cain would go down like the Titanic.

I did say and still say Cain has no chance at the Republican presidental nomination.
 
Jarod said:
I never believed Rudy or Hillary would be the nominee.

I never said Cain would go down like the Titanic.

I did say and still say Cain has no chance at the Republican presidental nomination.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter what you said.. the polls all said, and all the talking head 'experts' were telling us, it was going to be Rudy vs. Hillary... people would mention McCain and get laughed out of the room... he had like 12-13% ...Santorum numbers! People would pontificate on Obama, and oh... he was young and brilliant, but no one thought he could possibly be ready to jump in the national political arena with the Clinton Machine. I don't know who you were 'predicting' back then, what you have to say is not exactly worthy of my memory cell usage these days, so I can't tell you that... but what I do know is, what the pundits were saying, and how the polls looked. It's still WAYYY too early to tell who the nominee will be.

And that includes the possibility it might very well be Cain, you just don't know! I have not predicted it will be Cain, I merely said that Cain is who I plan to support, as long as he is on the ballot and still in the race. I haven't wavered on that. In fact, when I came out in support (feel free to search the thread) of Cain, I clearly stated that I did not expect him to win the nomination, and my candidate often doesn't. When Cain briefly led in the polls, I did not proclaim the race was over and Cain was the winner, I again, clearly stated that it's a long way to the primaries, and a lot can still happen. So whatever thrill you seem to be getting is kind of based on a fantasy you're having about something you imagine I have said.

Now what is the difference between "Cain has no chance of" and "Cain probably won't" in you opinion? Because that is what you said, and what I said, and the way I see it is... one of those comments is arrogant and idiotic, and one is pragmatic and reasoned. Beautifully illustrating the difference between you and I. Yes.... please... KEEP BUMPING THIS!!!
 
Dixie said:
I'll go out on a limb and say, any woman who was sexually harassed and didn't prosecute, but waited 14 years to raise a complaint, when the man began his presidential campaign, can only be described as a bitch.
Click to expand...

Then somebody needs to take a chainsaw to that limb. Several women raised complaints and were compensated because of them. I don't expect that the internal personnel matters of the NRA made headlines 14 years ago, especially since the agreements had confidentiality clauses.
 
Dixie said:
Not true. There was the account of Arkansas State Troopers who worked for him when he was governor, Clinton was a bona fide horndog, and in his case, most of the allegations were true.. he even had a special assistant assigned to bimbo eruptions.. that's all they did! Keeping evidence from coming out, became a Clinton trademark, long before he ever gained national prominence... we really don't want to compare Cain and Clinton.

Bitch #4, Cain says he has never met, doesn't know who she is.. doesn't remember her. The woman lives in Chicago, in the same building as David Axelrod... small fucking world, eh?

I actually think this helps Cain, because there will be a backlash. This has turned into the Gloria Alred Show, and most intelligent voters are going to be real turned off by this before it's over. Cain is currently tied with Romney, according to Gallup today... I like his odds.
Click to expand...

Arkansas troopers. :rolleyes:

Get back to us after you've researched Troopergate.
 
I never said Cain would go down like the Titanic.

You did say, "I like his odds" when discussing Cain's chances at the nomination.
 
Jarod said:
I never said Cain would go down like the Titanic.

You did say, "I like his odds" when discussing Cain's chances at the nomination.
Click to expand...

I said "like you and The Dud" were claiming the other day... Here is a quote from The Dud:

The Dude said:
Cain is sinking faster than Greek debt
Click to expand...

and here is a quote from you:

Dixie, you sure have been quiet about the meltdown of your canidate Cain.
Click to expand...

You'll recognize it as the title of the thread you started and have continued to bump.

So nobody used the exact words I said, but it was a figure of speech. Most intelligent people can look at what you and The Dud have said, and comprehend that my comment is not out of line or inaccurate in CONTEXT! If you now want to dance around on the head of a semantics pin insisting you didn't say something you clearly inferred, that's up to you, I can't stop you from being retarded.

I did say I like his odds, he's currently in a statistical tie for the lead, in spite of the smear efforts and his own gaffes. He may eventually go down, but it won't be because you and TurdHead brought him down or predicted it, it will be because the voters went a different way. I have never predicted Cain would win the nomination, I support him and hope he does, but I have repeatedly admitted he probably won't. Still... for someone who virtually no one had even heard of 6 months ago, with zero political experience, rising to the lead in the polls, I do like his odds. You don't have to agree with that, what you need to do is shut your pie hole and move on.
 
I say the Repubs should go with a Cain/Perry ticket. They compliment each other. :)

CAIN: “President Obama supported the uprising. Correct? President Mr. Obama called for the removal of Gaddafi. Just want to make sure we’re talking about the same thing before I say, ‘yes, I agreed’ or ‘no, I didn’t agree,’” he said. “President Obama supported the uprising. Correct? President Mr. Obama called for the removal of Gaddafi. Just want to make sure we’re talking about the same thing before I say, ‘yes, I agreed’ or ‘no, I didn’t agree,’” he said.

“I did not agree with the way he handled it for the following reason — no that’s a different one,” the flummoxed Republican contender continued, adding he’s “got all this stuff twirling around in my head.”


PERRY:
 
Dixie said:
I said "like you and The Dud" were claiming the other day... Here is a quote from The Dud:



and here is a quote from you:



You'll recognize it as the title of the thread you started and have continued to bump.

So nobody used the exact words I said, but it was a figure of speech. Most intelligent people can look at what you and The Dud have said, and comprehend that my comment is not out of line or inaccurate in CONTEXT! If you now want to dance around on the head of a semantics pin insisting you didn't say something you clearly inferred, that's up to you, I can't stop you from being retarded.

I did say I like his odds, he's currently in a statistical tie for the lead, in spite of the smear efforts and his own gaffes. He may eventually go down, but it won't be because you and TurdHead brought him down or predicted it, it will be because the voters went a different way. I have never predicted Cain would win the nomination, I support him and hope he does, but I have repeatedly admitted he probably won't. Still... for someone who virtually no one had even heard of 6 months ago, with zero political experience, rising to the lead in the polls, I do like his odds. You don't have to agree with that, what you need to do is shut your pie hole and move on.
Click to expand...

I know you would love it if I would move on, but.... not yet.

Do you understand what the word "and" means?

When you say you like someone's odd, what you really mean is, "I doubt he can win". Your command of the English language is dubious, even for someone from Alabama.
 
Jarod said:
I know you would love it if I would move on, but.... not yet.

Do you understand what the word "and" means?

When you say you like someone's odd, what you really mean is, "I doubt he can win". Your command of the English language is dubious, even for someone from Alabama.
Click to expand...

I'm done with this conversation whether you move on or not, moron. I said all I needed to say here:

Now what is the difference between "Cain has no chance of" and "Cain probably won't" in you opinion? Because that is what you said, and what I said, and the way I see it is... one of those comments is arrogant and idiotic, and one is pragmatic and reasoned. Beautifully illustrating the difference between you and I. Yes.... please... KEEP BUMPING THIS!!!
 
You are funny, one post you are begging me to move on, in the next you say you have moved on, then you bump the thread...


Something got your goat?
 
christiefan915 said:
Then somebody needs to take a chainsaw to that limb. Several women raised complaints and were compensated because of them. I don't expect that the internal personnel matters of the NRA made headlines 14 years ago, especially since the agreements had confidentiality clauses.
Click to expand...

You have no proof that they were compensated for any complaints.
Even though you keep preaching it like gospel, it ain't.
 
Poor Dixie...utterly humiliated by his love for Horny Herman the failed pizza exec...
 
The Dude said:
Cain is realing so bad he is canceling interviews with rightwing rags.
Click to expand...

He is off to Dan Qualye land with all the other right winggers Dixie has supported. Dix is way out of the mainstreem of Amercan politicsl thought .
 
Jarod said:
He is off to Dan Qualye land with all the other right winggers Dixie has supported. Dix is way out of the mainstreem of Amercan politicsl thought .
Click to expand...

When did I support Dan Quayle? Let me clarify, for your retarded ass, who I have supported in primaries through the years...

1976 Jimmy Carter
1980 Ronald Reagan
1984 Ronald Reagan
1988 Jack Kemp
1992 Pat Buchanan
1996 Phil Gramm
2000 Steve Forbes
2004 Bush (was unchallenged)
2008 Mike Huckabee

AS I SAID, MORON... My candidate usually doesn't win the nomination. It depends on what you call the "mainstream" of what you call "political thought" in America, I suppose... I don't think my list is a bunch of anti-American radicals or extremists by any stretch, with the exception of Jimmy Carter and maybe Pat Buchanan, but at the time they seemed pretty rational. My political thought is pretty much populist, I want what the majority of people want, I just believe in getting there a different way than you, and therein lies the rub. I believe we all have a voice at the ballot box, and the government should listen to what we say. I don't have to agree always, it may be something I completely disagree with, but part of living in a civil society is learning to be tolerant and respectful of others. Our system is such, that I can have a voice politically, and I can advocate for pretty much anything I feel is worthwhile, and that's really the only true "freedom" we have as people.

You believe in Statism, Marxism, Maoist Communism, National Socialism, and seek the destruction of everything Western civilization is based on.... you're too much of a duped moron to realize that's what you believe, but it is.
 
Dixie said:
When did I support Dan Quayle? Let me clarify, for your retarded ass, who I have supported in primaries through the years...

1976 Jimmy Carter
1980 Ronald Reagan
1984 Ronald Reagan
1988 Jack Kemp
1992 Pat Buchanan
1996 Phil Gramm
2000 Steve Forbes
2004 Bush (was unchallenged)
2008 Mike Huckabee

AS I SAID, MORON... My candidate usually doesn't win the nomination. It depends on what you call the "mainstream" of what you call "political thought" in America, I suppose... I don't think my list is a bunch of anti-American radicals or extremists by any stretch, with the exception of Jimmy Carter and maybe Pat Buchanan, but at the time they seemed pretty rational. My political thought is pretty much populist, I want what the majority of people want, I just believe in getting there a different way than you, and therein lies the rub. I believe we all have a voice at the ballot box, and the government should listen to what we say. I don't have to agree always, it may be something I completely disagree with, but part of living in a civil society is learning to be tolerant and respectful of others. Our system is such, that I can have a voice politically, and I can advocate for pretty much anything I feel is worthwhile, and that's really the only true "freedom" we have as people.

You believe in Statism, Marxism, Maoist Communism, National Socialism, and seek the destruction of everything Western civilization is based on.... you're too much of a duped moron to realize that's what you believe, but it is.
Click to expand...

Funny, Because I voted with the Majority in the last presidental election, I doubt you did. In fact I voted with the majority in 92', 96', 00' and 08', yet Im the marxist, Maoist, Noational Socialist....?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top