Dixie, you sure have been quiet about the meltdown of your canidate Cain... Whatsup?

No, I believe she is lying because Cain says he never met the woman, and doesn't know who the hell she is. Also, because she lives in the same building as Axelrod, and she's from Chicago. 'nuff said!

Silly reasons...

But who are bitches #'s 1, 2, and 3?
 
apparently you're the only one out there who isn't aware that Clinton committed perjury....

I recall Clinton being attacked for lots of things......his plans for nationalized health care, his foreign policy, his domestic policy......I know that there were claims he had raped women before he was elected.....I also recall a law suit involving Paula Jones......did anyone call for his impeachment prior to his testimony in that trial on the basis of his sexual activities?.......

Just because I am the only one who belives something, (Im not by the way) does not mean I am wrong.
I never mentioned impeachment. I said I find it hypocritical that those defending Cain were attacking President Clinton.
 
Silly reasons...

But who are bitches #'s 1, 2, and 3?

What do you want, their names? The first two are unidentified (convenient), and signed confidentiality agreements. The other one works for the government. None of these women has produced ANY evidence of ANY kind, it's simply a matter of their word against his. I feel pretty confident I know Herman Cain, and he didn't do what is being alleged. His supporters feel the same way, this man's character is impeccable. Meanwhile, no one knows a thing about these women, two of them, we don't even know their identity.
 
Just because I am the only one who belives something, (Im not by the way) does not mean I am wrong.
I never mentioned impeachment. I said I find it hypocritical that those defending Cain were attacking President Clinton.

Cain hasn't LIED to a GRAND JURY while UNDER OATH to give TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY!

BIG FUCKING DIFFERENCE THERE!
 
What do you want, their names? The first two are unidentified (convenient), and signed confidentiality agreements. The other one works for the government. None of these women has produced ANY evidence of ANY kind, it's simply a matter of their word against his. I feel pretty confident I know Herman Cain, and he didn't do what is being alleged. His supporters feel the same way, this man's character is impeccable. Meanwhile, no one knows a thing about these women, two of them, we don't even know their identity.

So you are calling them bitches?
 
why wouldn't I be?.......do you think there's something wrong with attacking mindless liberals who want to be president?......

I dont belive he is mindless and I like liberals. I dont think there is anything wrong with argueing against people you disagree with being elected President. I dont think disagreeing with them gives you liscence to attack them for things that you would not attack someone you agree with about. I belive in keeping the arguments honest and not making disingenous arguments simply because you dislike someone's politics.
 
I'll go out on a limb and say, any woman who was sexually harassed and didn't prosecute, but waited 14 years to raise a complaint, when the man began his presidential campaign, can only be described as a bitch.

Apperantly some of these women did raise a complaint back when it happened, otherwise how could there be a settlement?
 
Did they ask Paula Jones to take a Polygraph test before they paid for her plastic surgery?
 
Did they ask Paula Jones to take a Polygraph test before they paid for her plastic surgery?

Before she spent her settlement money you mean?

$850,000 buys a new face and a bit more.

Did they ask Clinton to take one?
 
Before she spent her settlement money you mean?

$850,000 buys a new face and a bit more.

Did they ask Clinton to take one?

She got the surgery before the lawsuit and some conservative organization admitted to paying for it.
 
Back
Top