Dixie, you sure have been quiet about the meltdown of your canidate Cain... Whatsup?

Jarod said:
Early on, when they started calling him a womanizer and attacking him.
There was less evidence than there currently is against Cain.
Click to expand...

Not true. There was the account of Arkansas State Troopers who worked for him when he was governor, Clinton was a bona fide horndog, and in his case, most of the allegations were true.. he even had a special assistant assigned to bimbo eruptions.. that's all they did! Keeping evidence from coming out, became a Clinton trademark, long before he ever gained national prominence... we really don't want to compare Cain and Clinton.

Bitch #4, Cain says he has never met, doesn't know who she is.. doesn't remember her. The woman lives in Chicago, in the same building as David Axelrod... small fucking world, eh?

I actually think this helps Cain, because there will be a backlash. This has turned into the Gloria Alred Show, and most intelligent voters are going to be real turned off by this before it's over. Cain is currently tied with Romney, according to Gallup today... I like his odds.
 
Jarod said:
We shall see Dixie... I'll bookmark this thread for retrival in August.
Click to expand...

Nah, we won't have to wait for this to unfold, we'll know long before August. I give it a few weeks, and it will die a silent death, or become such an obvious publicity train wreck, the libbies will be spinning it all back onto republicans again. Cain has solid support, and they are energized by this, because they believe in the integrity of the man. He simply didn't get to where he is today, by abusing or disrespecting women, and accusations of the sort are baseless and unfounded. You want to play this out to the angle that Cain is guilty, ala Anthony Weiner.. but that's not going to be the case here. Cain says he didn't do anything inappropriate, and his supporters believe him. That's ultimately all that matters at this point.
 
Jarod said:
Apperantly some of these women did raise a complaint back when it happened, otherwise how could there be a settlement?
Click to expand...

You and the rest of the left keep using the term "settlement"; while the initial report stated it was severence pay.
Your need to continue this, makes it look like you just might be worried about the outcome; plus it makes you appear to be oblivious to what severence pay means.
 
Jarod said:
I dont belive he is mindless and I like liberals. I dont think there is anything wrong with argueing against people you disagree with being elected President. I dont think disagreeing with them gives you liscence to attack them for things that you would not attack someone you agree with about. I belive in keeping the arguments honest and not making disingenous arguments simply because you dislike someone's politics.
Click to expand...

but I honestly disagree with you about his mindlessness and about liberals.....I don't attack them for things I would agree with if other people said them......I attack them for being incredibly stupid......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
but I honestly disagree with you about his mindlessness and about liberals.....I don't attack them for things I would agree with if other people said them......I attack them for being incredibly stupid......
Click to expand...

But you're not that smart, and you're certainly not clever.

You realize that, right?
 
Dixie said:
Nah, we won't have to wait for this to unfold, we'll know long before August. I give it a few weeks, and it will die a silent death, or become such an obvious publicity train wreck, the libbies will be spinning it all back onto republicans again. Cain has solid support, and they are energized by this, because they believe in the integrity of the man. He simply didn't get to where he is today, by abusing or disrespecting women, and accusations of the sort are baseless and unfounded. You want to play this out to the angle that Cain is guilty, ala Anthony Weiner.. but that's not going to be the case here. Cain says he didn't do anything inappropriate, and his supporters believe him. That's ultimately all that matters at this point.
Click to expand...

Spin it back to the Republicans? It has always been the Republicans. Where do you get that the Democrats are behind this?
 
Damocles said:
Let's ask Jarod to explain the difference between a Separation Agreement and a Settlement.
Click to expand...

I'd say that a separation agreement is a form of settlement, however it could be very general and not cover any specific claim, simply covering any and all claims. On the other hand it could be directed toward a specific claim. Many companies offer a separation agreement to everyone they fire, regardless of if they believe a claim exists. I'd say you would have to look at the separation agreement itself to determine if they gave her more money than others or if they referenced a specific event.
 
Jarod said:
Spin it back to the Republicans? It has always been the Republicans. Where do you get that the Democrats are behind this?
Click to expand...

I believe the original story, the woman who filed a complaint 14 yrs ago with the NRA, who remains anonymous, was 'leaked' by the Perry camp. Liberal reporters digging and probing, found the second and third women, and the fourth woman is a ringer tossed in by David Axelrod and the Democrats. Make no mistake, this has been a tag-team effort on part of Democrats and establishment Republicans, both of whom FEAR Herman Cain.
 
Jarod said:
I'd say that a separation agreement is a form of settlement, however it could be very general and not cover any specific claim, simply covering any and all claims. On the other hand it could be directed toward a specific claim. Many companies offer a separation agreement to everyone they fire, regardless of if they believe a claim exists. I'd say you would have to look at the separation agreement itself to determine if they gave her more money than others or if they referenced a specific event.
Click to expand...

You might say that, but virtually no one else does, especially legal people.
 
Jarod said:
I'd say that a separation agreement is a form of settlement, however it could be very general and not cover any specific claim, simply covering any and all claims. On the other hand it could be directed toward a specific claim. Many companies offer a separation agreement to everyone they fire, regardless of if they believe a claim exists. I'd say you would have to look at the separation agreement itself to determine if they gave her more money than others or if they referenced a specific event.
Click to expand...

"I'd say you would have to look at the separation agreement itself to determine if they gave her more money than others or if they referenced a specific event."

They why do you keep attempting to paint this with such a broad brush and keep insisting that their MUST BE something wrong?
If a couple of women ALL OF A SUDDEN accused Obama of similar behavior, with the approximate same time frame, would you all of a sudden say that Obama is toast?
 
Dixie said:
You might say that, but virtually no one else does, especially legal people.
Click to expand...

Well try bringing a lawsuit for anything that happened before you signed a separation agreement, see what happens. You will be told that you already gave up your right to sue on that issue. You know why? Becuase you settled it!
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
"I'd say you would have to look at the separation agreement itself to determine if they gave her more money than others or if they referenced a specific event."

They why do you keep attempting to paint this with such a broad brush and keep insisting that their MUST BE something wrong?
If a couple of women ALL OF A SUDDEN accused Obama of similar behavior, with the approximate same time frame, would you all of a sudden say that Obama is toast?
Click to expand...

No, because people already have an opinion of President Obama. I dont know if these allegations are true or not, when I say Cain is toast, its because of how I belive the voters will react, not because I personally belive Cain did anything wrong,
 
Jarod said:
No, because people already have an opinion of President Obama. I dont know if these allegations are true or not, when I say Cain is toast, its because of how I belive the voters will react, not because I personally belive Cain did anything wrong,
Click to expand...

And of course you stated it, in exactly that form.

Are you also saying that Obama is about reproach or of doing wrong?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top