If you truly want to critique what I wrote, how about you explain what part of it you disagree with. Then we might actually be able to have a conversation on the topic rather than having to read your pathetic attempts to insult me.
OK. Since you cannot think things through I'll do the work for you in simplified form. Let's say you have a school building that costs $100. Let's also say that you have 100 students. Let's say that you are funded $1 per student. Great, you have enough for the building. Now lets say you lose 10 students and the $10 that goes along with them. Does your costs for the building follow the student? Does the building now cost $90? Of course not.
Let's say in this school you have five classes of 20. Let's assume again that you lose 10 students, 2 in each class, and any funding that goes along with them. Do your teacher costs go down? Of course not.
How about buses? Administrators? Janitors? Etc. . . See what I'm saying here? Fixed costs v. variable costs?