Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
you should've tried working a while when younger, gramps
quite sucking up those taxpayer dollars
at least unlike you I earned my benefits while all you did is sign up for Welfare.

you should've tried working a while when younger, gramps
quite sucking up those taxpayer dollars
at least unlike you I earned my benefits while all you did is sign up for Welfare.
![]()
He is a vet. He served in Nam, that to me, earns him all his benefits.exactly how did you 'earn' your benefits?
He is a vet. He served in Nam, that to me, earns him all his benefits.
They still served, I’m sorry, I respect all vets. It’s something I never care to do.many, many Vietnam vets had cushy jobs......blow jobs, extra pay, and dirt cheap pot everywhere, living better than stateside troops
don't let this goldbricker fool ya, he was clearly a REMF
They still served, I’m sorry, I respect all vets. It’s something I never care to do.
many, many Vietnam vets had cushy jobs......blow jobs, extra pay, and dirt cheap pot everywhere, living better than stateside troops
don't let this goldbricker fool ya, he was clearly a REMF
They still served, I’m sorry, I respect all vets. It’s something I never care to do.
No, thank you for your service.That is the one thing we have in common. Thanks.
House Democrats plan to hold hearings on Medicare for All
Source: Washington Post
The new Democratic majority in the House will hold the first hearings on Medicare-for-All legislation, a longtime goal of the party’s left, after Speaker-designate Nancy Pelosi lent her support for the process.
“It’s a huge step forward to have the speaker’s support,” said Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who will be the House sponsor of the legislation, usually denoted as HR 676. “We have to push on the inside while continuing to build support for this on the outside.”
Some version of universal health care has been a Democratic goal for decades. The Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act, first introduced in 2003 by then-Rep. John Conyers Jr. of Michigan, has become the vehicle for Democrats who want to bring single-payer, Canada-style health care to the United States.
That legislation was typically sidelined, even when Democrats had power; in 2009 and 2010, when the House passed the Affordable Care Act, the “Medicare-for-All” package was not part of the discussion. But in his 2016 campaign for president, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) championed Medicare for All. The following year, for the first time, a majority of House Democrats co-sponsored HR 676.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...51eccc-0f6c-11e9-84fc-d58c33d6c8c7_story.html
How would it be paid for?![]()
Asshole, if Congress, a republican congress holds the purse strings and writes and passes spending legislation, how is it Obama’s fault?
How full of shit you are, remember the bush years when you blamed everything on the democratic Congress.Who signs the checks Sweet heart?
Likely taxation. Imagine taxing companies at a rate that would match up to the insurance costs for their employees. It would take a tremendous amount of tax as it is 1/6th of our economy. Either that or "Big Pharma" and "Big Oil" et al would receive a tremendous boost in funds as they no longer would have to pay for health insurance. Imagine the Democrats giving such a boon to "Big Company"... it would give them nightmares.
I suspect you are correct.
Don't businesses pass on the costs of taxation to consumers?
They still served, I’m sorry, I respect all vets. It’s something I never care to do.