Democrat terrorists released by the hundreds while every 1/6 protester faces prison

[LV426]

The Forrest Gump Moron Circus is done wasting my time with this bullshit. You bring it up for the billionth time, you get the copy and paste list of reasons you're an idiot, for the billionth time.

So what I don't see from your post is a clear, good excuse for why you spent months riling people up on the internet by spreading lies, but stopped short of acting on the lies you were telling on 1/6.

Nothing you say can change the fact that when the call came to save the Republic, you let it go to voicemail.

So the sincerity of what you post here is questionable because you lacked the courage to act on your convictions back on 1/6.

How come? Because you're chickenshit, right? Your big mouth constantly writes checks your scrawny ass can't cover.

 

[LV426]

The Forrest Gump Moron Circus is done wasting my time with this bullshit. You bring it up for the billionth time, you get the copy and paste list of reasons you're an idiot, for the billionth time.

Enjoy.

Oh, and one more thing...

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

You don't give a single answer or excuse for why you hid in your daddy's basement on 1/6 instead of fighting to save democracy in DC.

 

[LV426]

roblems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

So you didn't go to DC on 1/6 because there was no election theft?

 

[LV426]

It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

How am I attacking you personally by simply asking why were you nowhere near DC on 1/6, despite claiming the election was stolen?

 

[LV426]

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

So you didn't go to DC on 1/6 because...? Because you were too busy spreading lies on JPP to be bothered to act on what you were spreading.

So you were Trump's publicist then, spreading lies about the election on the internet to try and get people to attend the 1/6 attack that you were too chickenshit to attend yourself?

Do you think spreading lies on anonymous message boards is your contribution to saving the Republic?

 

[LV426]

But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

But you're not one of those people...you're just some loner who gets off on spreading lies on the internet, and who runs his big mouth but lacks all courage of his convictions.

There were plenty of poor, stupid people from all over the country that went to DC because they believed the lies you were telling.

But you didn't go to DC yourself, and the fact that you haven't said why completely undercuts and undermines every single plagiarized post you make.

You're just a fucking poseur...and you know it.

 

[LV426]

It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

The only thing I've asked is why you were too chickenshit to go to DC on 1/6, despite spreading lies about the election being stolen for three months prior.

What am I trying to taunt, goad, or troll you into?

 

[LV426]

By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

You said for three months that the election was stolen, and that the only way to save the Republic would be to not certify Biden's win on 1/6.

So when 1/6 came...you were...here on JPP instead of saving the Republic that you said for three straight months was threatened by a stolen election.

Your actions do not align with the urgency and magnitude of what you were alleging.

And I think you know that, which is why all you can do is just steal the work of other people and pass it off as your own on JPP.

 

[LV426]

The Forrest Gump Moron Circus is done wasting my time with this bullshit. You bring it up for the billionth time, you get the copy and paste list of reasons you're an idiot, for the billionth time.

Enjoy.

Oh, and one more thing...

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

Also, if I was so sure that the election was stolen then I'd take a PTO day on 1/6 to prevent the certification.

Do you get any PTO? Are you even employed? Be honest, I can tell when you're lying.

 

[reagansghost]

Originally Posted by Arminius

It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft.

anyone who agrees these lies about 'election theft' is a kook and deserves to be taunted, goaded, and trolled

 

[LV426]

anyone who agrees these lies about 'election theft' is a kook and deserves to be taunted, goaded, and trolled

What I want to know is taunt, goad, or troll them into what?

What am I trying to taunt that poseur into?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

By the left's obscenely dishonest standard for calling things "mostly peaceful," 1/6 was perfect tranquility.

Study: America Hit By Roughly 550 Violent Demonstrations in Three Months





The obvious solution to which would be: Stop stealing elections and then acting shocked and offended by revolts

This literally took ten seconds on Google:

At least 25 Americans were killed during protests and political unrest in 2020

If you can't find evidence that's literally effortless to pull up, I would say you are clearly the only idiot here.

Next.

Wow. You didn't bother to read your link, did you?

It lists 11 people killed during political protests. Of those:
Two were conservatives killed after pro-Trump “patriot rallies”.

Of the 9 people that died during 8 different BLM rallies out of the over 7,700 that took place
2 were shot to death by counter protestor Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha. Rittenhouse is facing murder charges.
Garret Foster, a protestor, was shot by Daniel Perry who was trying to drive his car through a protest after he had tweeted taking up arms against BLM.
3 people died when people drove cars into the protests and struck them.
One photographer was killed by a homeless man with a gun who was upset that people were in his park.
One was shot dead by police after they claimed he pointed a gun at them.
One was a Trump supporter shot in Portland while confronting an armed anti-fascist protestor who was later shot and killed by Police.

It seems the deaths were not the result of being trampled by the protestors or attacks by the protestors and the most people that died in one protest were 2 killed by Rittenhouse in Kenosha. Clearly with over 7,700 protests and only 9 deaths, the BLM protests were a lot safer than the attack on the US Capitol.

US Capitol - 5 people died during one protest.
BLM - 9 people died during 7,700 protests, most as a result of people not protesting attacking the protestors in some way.

 

[artichoke]

Another 50-post tantrum[/I]

Tell me if this sounds like I'm responding to tonight's performance of Sir Spamalot by telling him to piss off...

 

[artichoke]

anyone who agrees these lies about 'election theft' is a kook and deserves to be taunted, goaded, and trolled

1) Say the conspiracy theorist lunatics who fell for:

-the "Trump gassed protesters to give a speech" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax

2) Then you should be able to explain how someone who:

-comes in last place with humiliatingly abysmal numbers in every presidential race,
-picked the LEAST popular running mate possible according to virtually every single poll,
-hid in his basement and never campaigned,
-is the most well-documented establishment crook, racist, and child-groping creep ever to run for president,
-LOST almost every county Obama gained,
-LOST tons of black votes,
-LOST tons of Latino votes,
-had Democrats LOSING in Congress (indicating a dominant Republican turnout)...

...gets more votes than any person in history...even more than Obama (20 million more votes than voters, in fact).

Give. Me. A. Fucking. Break.

And also explain how Biden defied every law of statistics to be the first guy in history to get literally 100% of the suddenly "discovered" truckloads of votes in the middle of the night (really, not a single even ACCIDENTAL Trump vote? That doesn't happen. Ever. Without cheating. If you're going to lie, at least make it look convincing).

Follow the science. Or the math, in this case. Reconcile this obviously mathematically impossible narrative if you want anyone here to even begin to entertain the notion that Biden isn't a blatantly illegitimate usurper who committed treason.



For the record, just the one form of Democrat cheating alone (the coordinated suppression of the bombshell Hunter Biden scandal) altered the outcome, confirming that the American people had to be lied to and cheated in every possible way for Biden to "win," and that he is not supposed to be in office.

THEN there was:

-four years straight of Democrat terrorists violently intimidating everyone out of their rights with rioting, arson, looting, vandalism, assault, and murder
-the 24/7 plethora of constant fake scandals and witch hunts (how many votes does it cost a person for the entire establishment to lie about them being a secret Russian agent?)
-Google's unprecedented banning of only conservative sources from its search engines for months leading up to the election, so only the Democrat side of the story could be found
-all the social media platforms' unprecedented censoring and silencing of only conservatives for what they now acknowledge were accurate posts
-the unprecedented collusion between Democrats and corporations (detailed by TIME Magazine) to rig and steal the election
-all the unprecedented voter fraud that Democrats spent years telling us would happen if we ever fell for the mail-in voting scam that they later reversed course on (they tried to force it through even BEFORE COVID, and like all Democrat ideas, it was widely rejected as a corrupt abuse of power, so then they used COVID to argue that you can shop and dine in public, but somehow voting was just too dangerous)

If you are fucking stupid enough to look at this much evidence all proving that Biden was not legitimately elected and still somehow manage to conclude the exact opposite of what all of it points to...then I have a timeshare I'd like to tell you about.

But please, by all means, set us heathens straight and tell us how exactly Biden defied the laws of mathematics.

 

[Legion]

insurrection

 

[artichoke]

Wow. You didn't bother to read your link, did you?

It lists 11 people killed during political protests. Of those:
Two were conservatives killed after pro-Trump “patriot rallies”.

11 is more than five, right? That was the threshold for your little test, right?

Of the 9 people that died during 8 different BLM rallies out of the over 7,700 that took place 2 were shot to death by counter protestor Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha. Rittenhouse is facing murder charges.

Blatantly illegally, yes. Self-defense is not murder to anyone but Democrats, but go on.

Garret Foster, a protestor, was shot by Daniel Perry who was trying to drive his car through a protest after he had tweeted taking up arms against BLM.

They're a violent racist terror group at war with this country; they are this generation's version of the KKK. People SHOULD want to stop them.

3 people died when people drove cars into the protests and struck them.

One photographer was killed by a homeless man with a gun who was upset that people were in his park.
One was shot dead by police after they claimed he pointed a gun at them.
One was a Trump supporter shot in Portland while confronting an armed anti-fascist protestor who was later shot and killed by Police.

Cool story bro.

You say this like it means something.

Clearly with over 7,700 protests and only 9 deaths, the BLM protests were a lot safer than the attack on the US Capitol.

Deliberately cherry-picking only fatalities to avoid the 95% plethora of BLM/Antifa terrorism that consists of assault, arson, extortion, sedition, doxing and harassment, etc., sure, but that would be intentionally trying to lie with statistics. Democrats would never be attempting to do anything like that, right?

US Capitol - 5 people died during one protest. BLM - 9 people died during 7,700 protests, most as a result of people not protesting attacking the protestors in some way.

Because most of the terrorism was non-lethal. That doesn't make the 99% of political violence coming from Democrats "mostly peaceful."

Your embarrassingly inept attempt to spin your terrorist party as the exact opposite of what it is:

Try again, dishonest demagogue.

 

[LV426]

Tell me if this sounds like I'm responding to tonight's performance of Sir Spamalot by telling him to piss off...

The thing is, I responded to each line of your plagiarized post and you couldn't even defend what you stole from someone else.

The reason why is because you're a little bitch, and you know it.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Don't count on it.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

11 is more than five, right? That was the threshold for your little test, right?



Blatantly illegally, yes. Self-defense is not murder to anyone but Democrats, but go on.



They're a violent racist terror group at war with this country; they are this generation's version of the KKK. People SHOULD want to stop them.



Cool story bro.

You say this like it means something.



Deliberately cherry-picking only fatalities to avoid the 95% plethora of BLM/Antifa terrorism that consists of assault, arson, extortion, sedition, doxing and harassment, etc., sure, but that would be intentionally trying to lie with statistics. Democrats would never be attempting to do anything like that, right?

Because most of the terrorism was non-lethal. That doesn't make the 99% of political violence coming from Democrats "mostly peaceful."

Your embarrassingly inept attempt to spin your terrorist party as the exact opposite of what it is:

Try again, dishonest demagogue.

LOL.. Funny that you should mention stats when you think 7% of something is ALL or MOST and 15% is EVERY ONE.

 

[LV426]

Tell me if this sounds like I'm responding to tonight's performance of Sir Spamalot by telling him to piss off...

You're also a little bitch because you change the name of the person you're quoting, so they don't get the notification that you responded with plagiarized bullshit to one of their posts.

Bitch move there, kiddo...