Democrat terrorists released by the hundreds while every 1/6 protester faces prison

[Grokmaster]

Democrats spent four years straight committing non-stop acts of domestic terrorism on courthouses, capitals, police stations, and immigration facilities nationwide, yet Democrat officials responded with glowing adoration, enthusiastic support, total forgiveness, and even bailing them out so they could commit more felonies and violate more people's rights. But despite wave after wave of Democrats aiding and abetting arson, anarchy, riots, looting, secession, assault, murder, doxing, hoaxes, vandalism, and intimidation by left-wing terrorists...every single person who dared to resist their open theft of the presidency on January 6th by protesting at the Capitol Building one time...faces endless hysterical vilification, investigation, and outright persecution.

"The riots in New York City last June resulted in tens of millions of dollars in property damage and hundreds of rioters and looters arrested. In the Bronx alone, there were 118 arrests during the unrest. Many of the vandals and looters were caught on tape — many of their faces were visible. Others posted their exploits on social media.

If this sounds familiar it should. More than 400 rioters who stormed the Capitol building on January 6 have been arrested, largely through facial recognition and social media posts. Dozens of those rioters are facing stiff prison time. Both acts of violence were political. But only one set of rioters are being punished."​

Hundreds of Rioters and Looters in New York City Released While 1/6 Rioters Face Prison​

This goes way beyond the usual Democrat privilege. Such obscenely rigged, one-sided outcomes highlight how weaponized this government has become with continuously grotesque abuses of power against anyone to the right of Karl Marx.

YEAH...ALL THE DEMTHUGS DID WAS SET FIRE TO A FEDERAL COURTHOUSE ,WHILE SCREAMING "FUCK THE USA!!", ALONG WITH ALL THE OTHER FELONIES THEY ROUTINELY COMMIT ON A DAILY BASIS.

 

[artichoke]

Almost 500 people have been arrested for actions during the Jan 6th insurrection.

*insurrection mostly peaceful protest.

If you get to lie about your nonstop, nationwide, four-year violent crime spree being "mostly peaceful protests," then we get to TELL THE TRUTH about OUR one time fighting back being mostly peaceful.

Study: America Hit By Roughly 550 Violent Demonstrations in Three Months

Democrats commit four years straight of outright sedition, secession, treason, firebombing government buildings, etc., and the moment anyone fights back in any way even once, THAT'S "insurrection" to be endlessly hyperventilated over like the end of the fucking world.

Blatantly dishonest use of partisan propaganda terminology.

 

[artichoke]

YEAH...ALL THE DEMTHUGS DID WAS SET FIRE TO A FEDERAL COURTHOUSE ,WHILE SCREAMING "FUCK THE USA!!", ALONG WITH ALL THE OTHER FELONIES THEY ROUTINELY COMMIT ON A DAILY BASIS.

While accusing anyone who resists their nonstop treason and domestic terrorism...of being unpatriotic and lawless.

 

[artichoke]

While accusing anyone who resists their nonstop treason and domestic terrorism...of being unpatriotic and lawless.

This is just like what happened with slavery. Leftists hysterically and psychotically committed outright treason, demanded civil war and secession, and even tried to commit wholesale genocide on the South. They inflicted this monstrous insanity for YEARS, and then the moment their guy (Lincoln) took office, they immediately did a total 180 and began smearing their opponents as being "disunionists" who were lawless and disloyal to the country.

Total. Fucking. Hypocrisy.

It's the left's one absolute constant in all their sleazy deceit and lunatic abuses of power.

And now their ignorant brainwashed herd of leftist lemmings goes around dismissing the South's defense of the Constitution against these rampaging terrorists as "treason."

It is a humiliating indictment of our educational system to listen to any leftist attempt to analyze any part of our history that comes in contact with slavery.

And that is exactly how this part of modern history is playing out. Anything that involves President Trump instantly brings out their tantrum-throwing "Hulk smash" inner retard.

History repeats.

 

[Nordberg]

Reality calling. 1=6 was the most dangerous threat to the continuing existence of America since the war of 1812. The capitol building was attacked by a mob that was threatening our politicians and injured over 140 capitol cops. There is nothing to compare the Trump insurrection to.
BLM is fighting to make us live up to our promises. These Trumpys were trying to destroy the system to keep a corrupt president in office after losing an election.

 

[artichoke]

Reality calling. 1=6 was the most dangerous threat to the continuing existence of America since the war of 1812.

I know that conservatives resisting the theft of the presidency one time is scarier and more dangerous than the other 99% of actual insurrection and domestic terrorism committed by Democrats for the last four years straight (openly encouraged, celebrated, and even funded by Demagogue Party leadership)...because I keep telling me.

You might be an easily-manipulated sheep guzzling the Demagogue Party Kool-Aid by the gallon if you've successfully been distracted from the 99% of daily Democrat terrorism going on in every corner of the country to endlessly hyperventilate over the 1% that happened one time by rightly outraged conservatives. Just saying.

"Reality calling."

The capitol building was attacked by a mob that was threatening our politicians and injured over 140 capitol cops.

Threatening? By taking selfies?

Where were you when Democrats spent the last four years firebombing courthouses, storming capitals, and attacking immigration facilities?

Funny how effortless it is to program you lemmings to suddenly do a total 180 and begin being outraged by things you cheered for four years straight.

There is nothing to compare the Trump insurrection to.

True, because the other 99% of political violence and domestic terrorism committed by Democrats wasn't legitimate resistance against open election theft, but just nutjob brainwashed tantrums over "orange man bad."

BLM is fighting to make us live up to our promises.

Wow. You really ARE a full fledged cult member.



Burn any good books lately?

And no...

-extorting white businesses with brute force and death threats for personal gain is not "living up to some promise," it is selfish, Neanderthal bullying, ignorant tantrums, and bigoted domestic terrorism.
-burning down cities over self-defense is not "living up to some promise," it is selfish, Neanderthal bullying, ignorant tantrums, and bigoted domestic terrorism.
-lynching and doxing anyone who questions your cult of Marxist lunatics is not "living up to some promise," it is selfish, Neanderthal bullying, ignorant tantrums, and bigoted domestic terrorism.
-demanding that people who never owned slaves pay money to people who were never enslaved is not "living up to some promise," it is selfish, Neanderthal bullying, ignorant tantrums, and bigoted domestic terrorism.
-murdering and vilifying police officers with outright lies is not "living up to some promise," it is selfish, Neanderthal bullying, ignorant tantrums, and bigoted domestic terrorism.
-getting blacks murdered by defunding the police based on flat-out lies is not "living up to some promise," it is selfish, Neanderthal bullying, ignorant tantrums, and bigoted domestic terrorism.
-calling for every conceivable kind of racist preferential treatment is not "living up to some promise," it is selfish, Neanderthal bullying, ignorant tantrums, and bigoted domestic terrorism.

Total nutjob propaganda horseshit from an embarrassingly brainwashed crack-smoker.

These Trumpys were trying to destroy the system to keep a corrupt president in office after losing an election.

1) You were caught blatantly lying about this imaginary corruption over and over again, hence:

-the "Trump gassed protesters to give a speech" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax

Hint: You are what's corrupt.

2) *destroy save the system.

3) *losing winning and being robbed of an election.

4) That is, unless you can explain how someone who:

-comes in last place with humiliatingly abysmal numbers in every presidential race,
-picked the LEAST popular running mate possible according to virtually every single poll,
-hid in his basement and never campaigned,
-is the most well-documented establishment crook, racist, and child-groping creep ever to run for president,
-LOST almost every county Obama gained,
-LOST tons of black votes,
-LOST tons of Latino votes,
-had Democrats LOSING in Congress (indicating a dominant Republican turnout)...

...gets more votes than any person in history...even more than Obama (20 million more votes than voters, in fact).

Give. Me. A. Fucking. Break.

And also explain how Biden defied every law of statistics to be the first guy in history to get literally 100% of the suddenly "discovered" truckloads of votes in the middle of the night (really, not a single even ACCIDENTAL Trump vote? That doesn't happen. Ever. Without cheating. If you're going to lie, at least make it look convincing).

Follow the science. Or the math, in this case. Reconcile this obviously mathematically impossible narrative if you want anyone here to even begin to entertain the notion that Biden isn't a blatantly illegitimate usurper who committed treason.



For the record, just the one form of Democrat cheating alone (the coordinated suppression of the bombshell Hunter Biden scandal) altered the outcome, confirming that the American people had to be lied to and cheated in every possible way for Biden to "win," and that he is not supposed to be in office.

THEN there was:

-four years straight of Democrat terrorists violently intimidating everyone out of their rights with rioting, arson, looting, vandalism, assault, and murder
-the 24/7 plethora of constant fake scandals and witch hunts (how many votes does it cost a person for the entire establishment to lie about them being a secret Russian agent?)
-Google's unprecedented banning of only conservative sources from its search engines for months leading up to the election, so only the Democrat side of the story could be found
-all the social media platforms' unprecedented censoring and silencing of only conservatives for what they now acknowledge were accurate posts
-the unprecedented collusion between Democrats and corporations (detailed by TIME Magazine) to rig and steal the election
-all the unprecedented voter fraud that Democrats spent years telling us would happen if we ever fell for the mail-in voting scam that they later reversed course on (they tried to force it through even BEFORE COVID, and like all Democrat ideas, it was widely rejected as a corrupt abuse of power, so then they used COVID to argue that you can shop and dine in public, but somehow voting was just too dangerous)

If you are fucking stupid enough to look at this much evidence all proving that Biden was not legitimately elected and still somehow manage to conclude the exact opposite of what all of it points to...then I have a timeshare I'd like to tell you about.

 

[LV426]

I know that conservatives resisting the theft of the presidency one time

Your posts are inconsistent with your actions.

You say the election was stolen here, but you didn't go to DC on 1/6 to stop the steal.

Instead, you just spread the election lies in the hopes that other people would take the action you were too chickenshit to take yourself.

Or you don't actually believe the election was stolen, you're just saying it was so people will pay attention to you on an anonymous internet message board.

 

[artichoke]

Your posts are inconsistent with your actions.

You say the election was stolen here, but you didn't go to DC on 1/6 to stop the steal.

Instead, you just spread the election lies in the hopes that other people would take the action you were too chickenshit to take yourself.

Or you don't actually believe the election was stolen, you're just saying it was so people will pay attention to you on an anonymous internet message board.

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

 

[LV426]

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

What a load of panicked horseshit that you stole from someone else and plagiarized on JPP.

Your absence from DC on 1/6 would indicate you either didn't believe the lies you were telling, or you did and were just too chickenshit to act on them.

What a fucking loser.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

*insurrection mostly peaceful protest.

If you get to lie about your nonstop, nationwide, four-year violent crime spree being "mostly peaceful protests," then we get to TELL THE TRUTH about OUR one time fighting back being mostly peaceful.

Study: America Hit By Roughly 550 Violent Demonstrations in Three Months

Democrats commit four years straight of outright sedition, secession, treason, firebombing government buildings, etc., and the moment anyone fights back in any way even once, THAT'S "insurrection" to be endlessly hyperventilated over like the end of the fucking world.

Blatantly dishonest use of partisan propaganda terminology.

Mostly peaceful on Jan 6th other than the 5 people killed and the over 140 police officers injured. A rate of death and injury not matched by any other protest.

Yes, that is the US Capitol they are attacking to try to prevent the peaceful transfer of power.

When you read the article you linked to, which I am assuming you didn't read, it says this:

Ninety-three percent of these demonstrations were peaceful,

Then when you go to the study that the article is from it says this...

An Overwhelmingly Peaceful Movement

The vast majority of demonstration events associated with the BLM movement are non-violent (see map below). In more than 93% of all demonstrations connected to the movement, demonstrators have not engaged in violence or destructive activity. Peaceful protests are reported in over 2,400 distinct locations around the country. Violent demonstrations,4 meanwhile, have been limited to fewer than 220 locations —

https://acleddata.com/2020/09/03/de...violence-in-america-new-data-for-summer-2020/

The thing is, I can't find where 5 people died during BLM protests and yet 5 died during the attack on the US Capitol. And yet you want to argue that if 93% of protests were peaceful that doesn't mean that the protests were mostly peaceful. Thanks for showing us how much of an idiot you are.

 

[Concart]

The whataboutism is an utter failure. Anyone with a functioning brain cell knows the two things are completely different.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

This goes way beyond the usual Democrat privilege.
Such obscenely rigged, one-sided outcomes highlight how weaponized this government has become with continuously grotesque abuses of power against anyone to the right of Karl Marx.

Who the fuck cares about any asshole to the right of Karl Marx?
Certainly no one who matters.

 

[artichoke]

What a load of panicked horseshit that you stole from someone else and plagiarized on JPP.

Your absence from DC on 1/6 would indicate you either didn't believe the lies you were telling, or you did and were just too chickenshit to act on them.

What a fucking loser.

1) You think someone else wrote out this detailed breakdown of everything that's specifically wrong with what you're spamming THIS site with?

Well thought-out as always.



2) Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

 

[artichoke]

Mostly peaceful on Jan 6th other than the 5 people killed and the over 140 police officers injured. A rate of death and injury not matched by any other protest.

By the left's obscenely dishonest standard for calling things "mostly peaceful," 1/6 was perfect tranquility.

Study: America Hit By Roughly 550 Violent Demonstrations in Three Months

Yes, that is the US Capitol they are attacking to try to prevent the peaceful transfer of power.

The obvious solution to which would be: Stop stealing elections and then acting shocked and offended by revolts

The thing is, I can't find where 5 people died during BLM protests and yet 5 died during the attack on the US Capitol. And yet you want to argue that if 93% of protests were peaceful that doesn't mean that the protests were mostly peaceful. Thanks for showing us how much of an idiot you are.

This literally took ten seconds on Google:

At least 25 Americans were killed during protests and political unrest in 2020

If you can't find evidence that's literally effortless to pull up, I would say you are clearly the only idiot here.

Next.

 

[LV426]

You think someone else wrote out this detailed breakdown of everything that's specifically wrong with what you're spamming THIS site with?

In typical Conservative fashion, you accuse me of spamming the board, which you have done by copying-and-pasting the same hackneyed, stolen, plagiarized bullshit someone else wrote that you just ripped off.

You weren't in DC on 1/6 because you don't even believe the lies you're telling about the election.

 

[artichoke]

The whataboutism is an utter failure. Anyone with a functioning brain cell knows the two things are completely different.

Whataboutism is changing the subject to something unrelated to argue that two wrongs make a right, or that someone else did it, therefore it's okay. The TOPIC OF THIS THREAD is the night-and-day double standard where we ignore the 99% of domestic terrorism that is Democrats burning down courthouses, murdering police officers, rioting, looting, terrorizing people out of their rights, firebombing immigration facilities, etc. and focus only on the one time Democrats caused a revolt by stealing an election.

Newsflash: It can't be a diversion tactic from the original topic if it IS the original topic, genius.

For someone who is so quick to smear other people's intellect, you sure suck at rational thinking.

 

[artichoke]

Who the fuck cares about any asshole to the right of Karl Marx?
Certainly no one who matters.

I mean, thanks for confirming your extremist bigotry.

I always appreciate an assist.

 

[artichoke]

In typical Conservative fashion, you accuse me of spamming the board, which you have done by copying-and-pasting the same hackneyed, stolen, plagiarized bullshit someone else wrote that you just ripped off.

You weren't in DC on 1/6 because you don't even believe the lies you're telling about the election.

1) In perfect conservative fashion, I...responded to being incessantly spammed by creating a response that I can copy and paste every time you repeat this moronic fallacy.

2) Responding to incessant spamming by spamming you back is not ME being the spamming problem you retarded fucking imbecile.

3) Still don't have any idea where this plagiarism nonsense is coming from. I'm not Biden. I don't have to cheat and steal other people's work to spell out what's wrong with your idiot spamming BS. That doesn't even make sense to bring up in the first place.

4)

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

 

[LV426]

responded to being incessantly spammed by creating a response that I can copy and paste every time you repeat this moronic fallacy

You must not believe the election was stolen if you didn't go to DC on 1/6 when Trump asked you to.

 

[artichoke]

You must not believe the election was stolen if you didn't go to DC on 1/6 when Trump asked you to.

The Forrest Gump Moron Circus is done wasting my time with this bullshit. You bring it up for the billionth time, you get the copy and paste list of reasons you're an idiot, for the billionth time.

Enjoy.

Oh, and one more thing...

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.