Democrat second biggest contributor has been arrested.

Taichiliberal said:
A lofty sentiment. And after the "talk", then what? What if you don't get mutual agreement? Do you have a show of hands and majority rule? And how do you organize distribution of wealth, goods and services?

Like it or not, you're going to have to establish some sort of (GASP!) government to take care of business. In other words, what you need to do after you have your fantasy revolution.
Click to expand...

I don't organize distribution of anything, I leave that to the Invisible Hand.

I'm not an Anarchist I just don't believe we can have a free Republic as long as we have political parties.
 
Taichiliberal said:
So you actually have no real answer or course of action. You just spout off a lot of vague generalities, empty threats and empty rhetoric. Remember, YOU said both parties are "bought & paid for"....then you imply that you're going to join in or do the same with "money, connections". So in effect you're not offering any suggestion to correct the situation/problem, you just want to be a part of it. :palm:

Sorry, but you don't have the capitol to be a big player in local politics, let alone national. Too many right wing posters on various sites make all types of unproveable and unrealistic claims of wealth, professional job status, etc. I've found over the years that they do this to shore up their statements and assertions when facts and logical discourse won't. They spend way too much time on these sites to conduct any real business, which also may suggest they are just part of management or a paid troll. Also, their inability to logically, rationally and factually sustain a debate beyond a certain point dismisses any intellectual accreditation they may claim.

Like I said before, the OP misses the point that we're dealing with a bitcoin crook who buttered both sides of the political bread. That there were more wealthier GOP donators than him does NOT signify that he was/is a liberal democrat. It just means that there are more GOPers with deeper pockets.

That pretty much covers it here. If you've got any new angle to add, I'll respond. If not, I'll just move on.
Click to expand...

Hmmm.....Funny how you talk about GOP crooks and bitcoin when SBF was without a doubt backing Dems. Now, I'm not going to hammer you on that point because I don't see the world the way you see it, I think we have a uniparty, a very dangerous uniparty, so I don't play the Dem/GOP game. I think your criticisms are valid but I don't apply them to GOP or Dem because I see them as the same thing.
 
RB 60 said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Geez, you're such a child! You can't just flat out concede a point because I made it? GTFU, would ya please?
Click to expand...

OK Mr. Dimwit Liberal. I said most went to Democrats. Not all. So yes, some went to Republicans too. Now you STFU!
Click to expand...

For the adult readers: This is RB60's way of grudgingly conceding a point I made. For him, this is a BIG step! I appreciate it, given the source. ;)
 
Guille said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
A lofty sentiment. And after the "talk", then what? What if you don't get mutual agreement? Do you have a show of hands and majority rule? And how do you organize distribution of wealth, goods and services?

Like it or not, you're going to have to establish some sort of (GASP!) government to take care of business. In other words, what you need to do after you have your fantasy revolution.


I don't organize distribution of anything, I leave that to the Invisible Hand.

I'm not an Anarchist I just don't believe we can have a free Republic as long as we have political parties.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but this dog of yours just won't fly.

The chronology of the posts has you contradicting yourself...you're prepping you and your "family" for a revolution, yet you can't specify who or whom you'll be going up against, nor do you have any type of plan for how everyone in this country is going to function after your "revolution". This bullshit about the "Invisible Hand" essentially means that you expect others to do the heavy lifting, with you and yours in the wings to join in (assuming you agree with the agenda of the revolutionaries). You're against political parties, yet you haven't a clue (or offer one) as to how over 300 million people can manage themselves without chaos. Even if this country were to split up into separate nation states or tribes, there has to be some sort of governing.....monarchy, theocracy, socialist, communist, capitalist, etc. Making generalized statement as you do here is meaningless.

It's okay to complain, it's okay to criticize. But if you have nothing of worth to offer as an alternative or correction, then you're just part of the problem. I'm not being harsh, just logical.
 
Guille said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Geez, you're such a child! You can't just flat out concede a point because I made it? GTFU, would ya please?
Click to expand...


I remember saying the same thing to you not too long ago.
Click to expand...

Difference being I can always logically and factually back up what I say. Nine out of ten times you can't. And if I'm proven wrong, I DO ADMIT AND CONCEDE SUCH. Over the years, I use the phrase "I stand corrected" sometimes accompanied by "I apologize".

YOU HAVE NEVER DONE SO IN ANY OF OUR EXCHANGES....OR WITH ANYONE ELSE THAT I HAVE WITNESSED.
 
Guille said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
So you actually have no real answer or course of action. You just spout off a lot of vague generalities, empty threats and empty rhetoric. Remember, YOU said both parties are "bought & paid for"....then you imply that you're going to join in or do the same with "money, connections". So in effect you're not offering any suggestion to correct the situation/problem, you just want to be a part of it.

Sorry, but you don't have the capitol to be a big player in local politics, let alone national. Too many right wing posters on various sites make all types of unproveable and unrealistic claims of wealth, professional job status, etc. I've found over the years that they do this to shore up their statements and assertions when facts and logical discourse won't. They spend way too much time on these sites to conduct any real business, which also may suggest they are just part of management or a paid troll. Also, their inability to logically, rationally and factually sustain a debate beyond a certain point dismisses any intellectual accreditation they may claim.

Like I said before, the OP misses the point that we're dealing with a bitcoin crook who buttered both sides of the political bread. That there were more wealthier GOP donators than him does NOT signify that he was/is a liberal democrat. It just means that there are more GOPers with deeper pockets.

That pretty much covers it here. If you've got any new angle to add, I'll respond. If not, I'll just move on.
Click to expand...


Hmmm.....Funny how you talk about GOP crooks and bitcoin when SBF was without a doubt backing Dems. Now, I'm not going to hammer you on that point because I don't see the world the way you see it, I think we have a uniparty, a very dangerous uniparty, so I don't play the Dem/GOP game. I think your criticisms are valid but I don't apply them to GOP or Dem because I see them as the same thing.
Click to expand...

:palm: How many times over the years have I told you to READ CAREFULLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY? If you had, you would have noticed the explanations in Posts #135 and #141, of which I repeated above. Read them again, and if you still don't get it you can have a nearby adult explain it to you....because I can't help insipid stubbornness, intellectual impotence and/or dishonesty.
 
Last edited:
The worst thing about this is that this was so obviously a con man doing a con job.....and yet none of the Elites ever called him out.....they either are too dumb or they did not want us to know.

These are scary times....this shit gets punished by the Universe.
 
U.S. Scrutinizes Political Donations by Sam Bankman-Fried and Allies

A law firm representing some of the most important Democratic political organizations — including the party’s official campaign arms, its biggest super PACs and the campaigns of high-profile politicians such as Representative Hakeem Jeffries — received an email from a prosecutor in the United States attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York. The email sought information about donations from Mr. Bankman-Fried, his colleagues and companies, according to people familiar with the request, who insisted on anonymity to discuss an ongoing law enforcement matter.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/17/us/politics/sam-bankman-fried-political-donations-doj.html
 
Hawkeye10 said:
The worst thing about this is that this was so obviously a con man doing a con job.....and yet none of the Elites ever called him out.....they either are too dumb or they did not want us to know.

These are scary times....this shit gets punished by the Universe.
Click to expand...

They didn't care so long as the check cleared and no initial red flags were raised. This is why suggesting the McCain/Feingold bill was a sunlight to a vampire for both political parties.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top