Democracy’s Assassins Always Have Accomplices

[martin]

First of all, what do you mean "ours" english guy?

Second of all go fuck yourself. At the federal level we are not a democracy.

You must think I'm an "english guy" because I seem to know the language you struggle with. Read my profile. You're in dumbbell land as well about the other subject of your post.

 

[Hawkeye10]

You must think I'm an "english guy" because I seem to know the language you struggle with. Read my profile. You're in dumbbell land as well about the other subject of your post.

You are attempting to converse with a probable WOKE fuck.

Which rarely works out.

 

[Into the Night]

Different from republics such as those in China and North Korea in that ours is governed under a system of representative democracy. Now go read a dictionary and a book about your country.

No dictionary defines any word. False authority fallacy.

China is not a republic. It is currently an oligarchy.
North Korea is not a republic. It is currently an dictatorship.
The United States was never a democracy. Democracies have no representatives.

 

[Into the Night]

Suck a cock

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Insult fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

First of all, what do you mean "ours" english guy?

Second of all go fuck yourself. At the federal level we are not a democracy.

The current form of the former federal government is an oligarchy.

 

[Grokmaster]

Finally, with remarkably few exceptions, Republican leaders say they will still support Mr. Trump even if he is convicted of plotting to overturn an election. Alternatives exist. The Republican National Committee could declare that the party will not nominate an individual who poses a threat to democracy or has been indicted on serious criminal charges. Or Republican leaders could jointly declare that, for the sake of democracy, they will endorse Mr. Biden if Mr. Trump is the Republican nominee. Such a move would, of course, destroy the party’s chances in 2024. But by keeping Mr. Trump out of the White House, it would help protect our democracy.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/08/opinion/trump-republicans-spain-brazil.html

Yes, like traitors who illegally changed state election laws, in blatant violation of Artuicle II of the US Constitution, to allow tens of millions of unsolicited, unverified, unvetted mail in ballots to steal an election in the dead of night.

 

[Gondwanaland]

Yes, like traitors who illegally changed state election laws, in blatant violation of Artuicle II of the US Constitution, to allow tens of millions of unsolicited, unverified, unvetted mail in ballots to steal an election in the dead of night.

The courts disagree with you.

 

[Flash]

The NYT printed a retraction saying it was fiction...

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/20/...istorians-who-critiqued-the-1619-project.html

They then printed further corrections and retractions on it

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/11/magazine/an-update-to-the-1619-project.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/09/magazine/1619-project-us-history.html

Historical fiction, not history.

These links do not seem like a retraction but a defense of the 1619 Project and the NYT stories after making a few clarifications on the topic.

 

[Flash]

Except that's the truth. The US, thank your deity of choice, is not a democracy. Democracy is pure mob rule. We have protections in place against such bullshit, through our representative republic.

Are New England town meetings mob rule?

 

[Gondwanaland]

Are New England town meetings mob rule?

The few that have Open Town Meetings, most certainly.