DEAD MEN DON’T NEED IMPEACHMENT. Swamp in Panic: Trump In Danger.

Trump has been caught colluding with Ukraine, and admitted that he would take dirt if Russia offered it, but you Trumpcucks still refuse to accept that Saint Trump colluded with Russia.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?123189-For-people-who-still-don-t-understand-the-Russian-collusion

Trump hasn’t been caught doing anything in Ukraine.

But here is Politico tattling on Democrats meddling in Ukraine AGAINST Trump. In the 2016 election.

Wasn’t Mullet tasked with investigating foreign interference in the election?

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
 
I read things if they aren't obvious propaganda.

is this "obvious propaganda?....
Letter.jpg


"at the request of President Obama"?.......
 
Trump has been caught colluding with Ukraine, and admitted that he would take dirt if Russia offered it, but you Trumpcucks still refuse to accept that Saint Trump colluded with Russia.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?123189-For-people-who-still-don-t-understand-the-Russian-collusion

To the contrary, from the article ...

"By May of 2019 it was also known that Democrats solicited Ukraine to ‘dig up dirt’ on the Trump campaign—which has now been admitted by Ukraine—using these same U.S. government entities as conduits to assist the DNC (Democrat National Committee) using a Ukraine-American spy, Alexandra Chalupa.

This was all confirmed by POLITICO in its rather amazing article published January 11, 2017, (they are extremely anti-Trump) but it’s out there. The Ukraine admitted what was done, and apologised. (https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446)"
 
Don't you get all your news from memes?

no.....I ridicule your memes because they fuel your retardation.......there's some interesting stuff in the OP that is not refuted or refutable.......obviously you don't dare read it........but perhaps you can explain the Boris Johnson letter from November, 2016 which indicates that President Obama requested British Intelligence to CONTINUE its surveillance of Trump.......
 
the problem is Mueller report was a whitewash, poorly run hit job done by Andrew Weissmann
to bolster the Deep State Creeps..
It was 2 years long and 1 inch deep.. Investigation of media reports FFS

I expect the Horowitz report ( being delayed by classification review of all the fucking ironies)
will at least get the FISA abuses.

But it's going to take the Durham investigation to pin this stuff down,like the origination of the Russian hoax etc.

Meanwhile we get a Star Chamber from Schiff - designed to muddy up anything from Ukraine which AGAIN looks to be a source for much of this hackery
 
To the contrary, from the article ...

"By May of 2019 it was also known that Democrats solicited Ukraine to ‘dig up dirt’ on the Trump campaign—which has now been admitted by Ukraine—using these same U.S. government entities as conduits to assist the DNC (Democrat National Committee) using a Ukraine-American spy, Alexandra Chalupa.

This was all confirmed by POLITICO in its rather amazing article published January 11, 2017, (they are extremely anti-Trump) but it’s out there. The Ukraine admitted what was done, and apologised. (https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446)"

This is #whataboutism. Even if Hillary did collude with Ukraine, that does NOT mean Trump didn't also try to collude during the "perfect" phone call.
 
There was no Quid Pro Quo?
Or is it that there was a Quid Pro Quo, but that's ok, because he does it all the time?

How about there’s insufficient evidence for a quid pro quo lol?

It Nancy had the evidence she would call for a vote. For myself [maybe I’m not alone, idk] my only problem with Biden’s quid pro quo would be if he wanted the prosecutor off the case to *cover up* corruption. If it was done for legitimate reasons—it wouldn’t be illegal, because that’s simply placing stipulations on a handout. Even our own citizens are required to meet certain requirements before they get a government handout.

Maybe someone can explain to me why foreign leaders should be treated any differently.

ASSUMING Trump was withholding aid to *investigate* corruption I don’t see a problem with it. I just cited an article from Politico that tells of democrats going to Ukraine for campaign dirt on Trump. Trump was apparently aware of that and asked his counterpart to investigate it.

Why is that such a big deal? Election meddling by foreigners is a big deal, right?

The Biden’s were mixed up with the Ukraine and that is beyond dispute. The only question is whether it was legal or not. Some say the matter is settled but they never go beyond ‘it’s been investigated’. That may be so, but can we see the pertinent facts, finally?

That’s basically all Trump was asking for in his ‘favor’. This is a bigger Nothing Burger than the Russian fiasco.
 
you are obviously the one who is gullible.......if it wasn't true, I expect you can provide us with an official statement from the British government condemning the forgery and denying it?.......

The British government probably isn't aware of every single piece of Fake News that morons are sharing online. If I create a meme saying the Indian government blew up the moon, chances are the Indian government won't provide an official statement saying the claim is bullshit.
 
This is #whataboutism. Even if Hillary did collude with Ukraine, that does NOT mean Trump didn't also try to collude during the "perfect" phone call.

the reading of the transcript means Trump didn't try to collude......the only thing that means he did is having your head firmly planted up your own ass so you can't think clearly.......
 
Back
Top