CT gun registration leads to confiscation

SmarterthanYou said:
more zappa obtuseness LOL it's ok, we understand you're embarrassed at being proven wrong
Click to expand...


"Experts claim that as many as 350,000 people are in violation of the law"


STY thinks he and his CT gun nut buddies should be allowed to ignore whichever laws they choose...
 
ZappasGuitar said:
"Experts claim that as many as 350,000 people are in violation of the law"


STY thinks he and his CT gun nut buddies should be allowed to ignore whichever laws they choose...
Click to expand...

so did the founders, when those laws were in violation of the constitution. you're on the losing side of this and have been proven wrong again.
 
Doppelganger said:
hopefully some police get killed in the process.
Click to expand...

I was going to say, "It's a good time for gun owners to educate non-gun owners on the reasons they own and value guns"

But jumping to, "Hopefully some police get killed" doesn't really surprise me on this forum...

You could have even said, "Hopefull police will take a stand against a government that get's too out of control" but you chose to hope police get killed....even the most extreme media says this........yet you stated "hopefully some police get killed in the process" and you got 4 likes for such an uneducated post...

Since when does "let's kill cops" get 4 "Thanks!"

The mental moral process of you and your followers is shining bright. The left is screaming victory. The right is screaming "why would this idiot post such a thing"

Something to think about
 
SmarterthanYou said:
they've done it in New York and they are doing it in Cali, so why should CT be any different? my guess is that there will be some shots fired, people and cops killed, the media will propagandize about all the lawlessness of assault weapons, conveniently ignoring that the cops have their own, and zappa will continue to deny that confiscation will happen after registration.
Click to expand...

They also did it in Australia under the title "They banned our guns".

Maybe gun owners should use INFORMATION instead of MISINFORMATION to have a talking point today. Because Australians still have guns...............

Say what it is! Explore and debate the point of the topic!

Anyone educated can hold this debate................(this just in, the Right Wing cut funding to education almost everywhere)................ahhhhh crap.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so did the founders, when those laws were in violation of the constitution. you're on the losing side of this and have been proven wrong again.
Click to expand...


I'm going to be honest. The founders wanted guns for freedom to fight the things they had already fought. Such as Freedom of Religion where Christians were not free to be Christians. Ironically, today in America Christians are treating other people the way that Christians ran away from, that's fact. We had to find a Country Christians could be Christians and not suffer from the judgement of being a Christian.

So we decided to take over the Indians. (Yea, the history books are wrong, when can you admit that?)

We used the very same Fear Mongering force the Right is using today. "Fear me or else" tactics.

Today we see the gun owners trying to use the same tactic we used CENTURIES ago. But guess what. The people don't fear you because you have a weapon idiot. I have weapons too idiot..

This is only the past and the same is occurring today globally. It's not rocket science but parties make it over complicated to understand.
 
The Dude said:
The NRA is the baddest gang in the country!
Leading bubba's by the low IQ
Click to expand...

I'm not sure why you are so unecuated on GENERAL funding of opinion but you show up and recognize it when it's anti-gun but you seem to be wrong on every topic possible.

People SHOULD have the right to GUNS, EDUCATION, A FAIR WAGE AND INFORMATION.

YOU stand against everything American small brain. But let's be honest, you aren't here to discuss politics.....You just want what to know what is going on with the market and want to post what is best for it.

You don't understand the scenario that sometimes MORE AMERICANS CAN GAIN on a topic than a few in the market will.
.........Im kicking myself for spending time to educate someone that is clearly not here to be educated and will not receive any of my information I spent brain time to think about...
 
Anti-Party said:
I'm not sure why you are so unecuated on GENERAL funding of opinion but you show up and recognize it when it's anti-gun but you seem to be wrong on every topic possible.

People SHOULD have the right to GUNS, EDUCATION, A FAIR WAGE AND INFORMATION.

YOU stand against everything American small brain. But let's be honest, you aren't here to discuss politics.....You just want what to know what is going on with the market and want to post what is best for it.

You don't understand the scenario that sometimes MORE AMERICANS CAN GAIN on a topic than a few in the market will.
.........Im kicking myself for spending time to educate someone that is clearly not here to be educated and will not receive any of my information I spent brain time to think about...
Click to expand...

The Dude is smarter than you when he is sleeping retard. Go away.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Threatening to arrest those in violation of the LAW.

How DARE those evil cops...doing their DAMN JOB and threatening to arrest CRIMINALS breaking the law.
Click to expand...

:rofl2:

Look at the liberal wanting cops to do their job, I said the same thing about the illegals entering the USA, instead I got liberal politicians telling the cops to ignore the law and not arrest them.
 
StormX said:
:rofl2:

Look at the liberal wanting cops to do their job, I said the same thing about the illegals entering the USA, instead I got liberal politicians telling the cops to ignore the law and not arrest them.
Click to expand...

the problem with this is that liberals only believe in certain laws, just like conservatives do. the ones they don't like, they want to have ignored.
 
http://www.examiner.com/article/breaking-connecticut-politicians-warned-over-gun-laws

The Constitution that created this nation of freedom says that firearms possession is an unalienable right. How do we know that? Because it is the second of the citizens' rights specifically protected by the Constitution in the Bill of Rights, second only to the First Amendment right to free speech, free assembly, free press, and free religious expression.

The Founding Fathers said that these rights cannot be negated by the laws of men. If they try, then they are automatically showing they are dangerous and tyrannical, and they will not hesitate to remove every God given liberty this country has enjoyed for over 200 years.

http://christianmerc.blogspot.com/2014/03/treacherous-path-to-oblivion.html

The police departments, legislators and governors appear to be under the misconception that they, or the courts are in charge of deciding what rights the people have. The truth is much more stark: the people decide that by deciding which rights they will defend with their lives. Once blood is shed by the government, that decision comes much easier to make. The governments can come to grips with that in their own time, or they can push the issue and find out what little power they actually possess.
Click to expand...
 
Anti-Party said:
I'm not sure why you are so unecuated on GENERAL funding of opinion but you show up and recognize it when it's anti-gun but you seem to be wrong on every topic possible.

People SHOULD have the right to GUNS, EDUCATION, A FAIR WAGE AND INFORMATION.

YOU stand against everything American small brain. But let's be honest, you aren't here to discuss politics.....You just want what to know what is going on with the market and want to post what is best for it.

You don't understand the scenario that sometimes MORE AMERICANS CAN GAIN on a topic than a few in the market will.
.........Im kicking myself for spending time to educate someone that is clearly not here to be educated and will not receive any of my information I spent brain time to think about...
Click to expand...

You couch surf while your better half works. Fucking bumb
 
ZappasGuitar said:
"100,000 COULD face heavily armed police..."

COULD...not WILL...as usual it's all unfounded hyperbole from another fear mongering Rightie.

"COULD face felony charges"..."COULD have their doors smashed in"... still more unfounded fear mongering.

CT residents COULD wake up to nuclear war with Russia tomorrow, but in all likelihood, that won't happen...

See that's the part the fear mongers won't mention...the likelihood it won't happen.
Click to expand...

when you refuse to learn from history, history will kick your ass....
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Threatening to arrest those in violation of the LAW.

How DARE those evil cops...doing their DAMN JOB and threatening to arrest CRIMINALS breaking the law.
Click to expand...

evidence of the fascist thought process....determine that people lawfully exercising their constitutional rights to keep and bear arms are acting unlawful and presto chango, the lawful citizen of yesterday becomes the criminal of today to be hunted down tomorrow....
 
Anti-Party said:
I'm going to be honest. The founders wanted guns for freedom to fight the things they had already fought. Such as Freedom of Religion where Christians were not free to be Christians. Ironically, today in America Christians are treating other people the way that Christians ran away from, that's fact. We had to find a Country Christians could be Christians and not suffer from the judgement of being a Christian.

So we decided to take over the Indians. (Yea, the history books are wrong, when can you admit that?)

We used the very same Fear Mongering force the Right is using today. "Fear me or else" tactics.

Today we see the gun owners trying to use the same tactic we used CENTURIES ago. But guess what. The people don't fear you because you have a weapon idiot. I have weapons too idiot..

This is only the past and the same is occurring today globally. It's not rocket science but parties make it over complicated to understand.
Click to expand...

yet another who alternately dismisses and distorts history.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top