Crime rate for Customs officers is higher than for undocumented immigrants.

Did @Jake Starkey just ask how breaking a Federal Law makes a Federal crime?

Did he really just ask that? You can't make this shit up.
When I first came across his post, I had to do a quadruple check to make sure I was reading it correctly, but yes, he really DID ask that. And here I thought that AProudLefty's deaf studies were going poorly... I think Jake takes the cake on this one.
 
That's an interesting "fact" that ignores the well over 2,000 people that judges have released because ICE detained them in violation of the law.
 
That's an interesting "fact" that ignores the well over 2,000 people that judges have released because ICE detained them in violation of the law.
Well, in the case of Jeffery Cummings, a judge in Chicago who ordered released almost 1000 (615 in one case 313 in another) both of those were subsequently overturned, and one by the Supreme Court. So his ordered releases in these two cases don't count.

In their ruling, Lee and Pryor agreed with the Trump administration that Cummings had improperly applied the consent decree, which was centered on one section of federal immigration law that covered so-called "warrantless arrests" of illegal immigrants made during raids and patrols, to also forbid arrests and detentions using different provisions of federal immigration law. Those other provisions specifically allow for immigration agents to arrest illegal immigrants using so-called "field warrants."

In their ruling, Lee and Pryor said Cummings then improperly lumped all of the detained illegal immigrants into one "class," and then ordered all released, without any individual determination on whether their arrest and detention had been proper.

 
Well, in the case of Jeffery Cummings, a judge in Chicago who ordered released almost 1000 (615 in one case 313 in another) both of those were subsequently overturned, and one by the Supreme Court. So his ordered releases in these two cases don't count.

In their ruling, Lee and Pryor agreed with the Trump administration that Cummings had improperly applied the consent decree, which was centered on one section of federal immigration law that covered so-called "warrantless arrests" of illegal immigrants made during raids and patrols, to also forbid arrests and detentions using different provisions of federal immigration law. Those other provisions specifically allow for immigration agents to arrest illegal immigrants using so-called "field warrants."

In their ruling, Lee and Pryor said Cummings then improperly lumped all of the detained illegal immigrants into one "class," and then ordered all released, without any individual determination on whether their arrest and detention had been proper.

Gosh. I guess you decided to just ignore the other thousands.
 
Well, in the case of Jeffery Cummings, a judge in Chicago who ordered released almost 1000 (615 in one case 313 in another) both of those were subsequently overturned, and one by the Supreme Court. So his ordered releases in these two cases don't count.

In their ruling, Lee and Pryor agreed with the Trump administration that Cummings had improperly applied the consent decree, which was centered on one section of federal immigration law that covered so-called "warrantless arrests" of illegal immigrants made during raids and patrols, to also forbid arrests and detentions using different provisions of federal immigration law. Those other provisions specifically allow for immigration agents to arrest illegal immigrants using so-called "field warrants."

In their ruling, Lee and Pryor said Cummings then improperly lumped all of the detained illegal immigrants into one "class," and then ordered all released, without any individual determination on whether their arrest and detention had been proper.

By the way, it appears you didn't bother to actually read the article you linked to. (Is it because you are in a cult?)

This is the appeals court - (No appeal to USSC within that 14 days)
They believed the so-called consent decree negotiated by the former president, which sought to enshrine the Biden administration's notoriously lax immigration enforcement policies, can be used to bind some of the immigration enforcement policy decisions of the current White House.
While they said the Biden-era decree can be enforced, the majority said the Trump administration was still likely to prevail on their claims Cummings had illegally used the decree to order the release of perhaps half of the illegal immigrants agents had detained using field warrants.


So it seems that about half of those you claimed weren't released actually had a court order requiring their release.
 
Back
Top