Could impeachment be a possibility ?

http://tinyurl.com/ok6gb9a

Justice Department Fights Release of Secret Court Opinion Finding Unconstitutional Surveillance

Could we survive the riots...........

Impeach who, the entire government?

"As news reports emerge about the massive phone records and internet surveillance programs—each of which began during the Bush administration and were carried out under congressional oversight and FISA court review..."
 
Impeach who, the entire government?

"As news reports emerge about the massive phone records and internet surveillance programs—each of which began during the Bush administration and were carried out under congressional oversight and FISA court review..."

That's what's hilarious. It was all legal. And saved lives.
 
That's what's hilarious. It was all legal. And saved lives.

Every time someone says that bush should have been impeached over Iraq bravs drags out his list of Dems who voted for the resolution, so why shouldn't it be the same for this?

McCain's not bothered by the program, impeach McCain.
 
for what possible cause?
Are you totally in the dark? Thomas actively participates in partisan fund raisers. He is passing judgement on cases for his ex (and maybe still) boss (Monsanto) instead of recusing himself. He is filing fraudulent income tax statements in regards to hundreds of thousands of dollars that anyone at your local H&R Block would know better than doing. And then claims it as a simple mistake. What? He doesn't understand the law? His wife is a lobbiest for partisan causes he rules on. Get a clue!

Right now a group of 20 House Democrats led by Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) are now pushing for a Justice Department investigation into Justice Thomas' possible serious ethics violations. The only reason it's "just" democrats is the open and obvious partisanship of this supreme court, of which Thomas is just the most flagrant abuser. Want more details check the links below or do your own web search.


sources:
http://jonathanturley.org/2011/01/21/justice-thomas-accused-of-reporting-violations/
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65275.html
http://www.change.org/petitions/make-the-doj-investigate-clarence-thomas-ethics-violations
http://rootsaction.org/take-action/139-impeach-clarence-thomas
 
Are you totally in the dark? Thomas actively participates in partisan fund raisers. He is passing judgement on cases for his ex (and maybe still) boss (Monsanto) instead of recusing himself. He is filing fraudulent income tax statements in regards to hundreds of thousands of dollars that anyone at your local H&R Block would know better than doing. And then claims it as a simple mistake. What? He doesn't understand the law? His wife is a lobbiest for partisan causes he rules on. Get a clue!

Right now a group of 20 House Democrats led by Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) are now pushing for a Justice Department investigation into Justice Thomas' possible serious ethics violations. The only reason it's "just" democrats is the open and obvious partisanship of this supreme court, of which Thomas is just the most flagrant abuser. Want more details check the links below or do your own web search.


sources:
http://jonathanturley.org/2011/01/21/justice-thomas-accused-of-reporting-violations/
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65275.html
http://www.change.org/petitions/make-the-doj-investigate-clarence-thomas-ethics-violations
http://rootsaction.org/take-action/139-impeach-clarence-thomas

I've read over a dozen articles over the last 3 years about other federal judges doing the exact same things. Why are you only going after Thomas? because he's a conservative? because he's black?
 
I've read over a dozen articles over the last 3 years about other federal judges doing the exact same things. Why are you only going after Thomas? because he's a conservative? because he's black?


Well, since "Playing the Race Card" and "Right-Wing Victim Complex" are closed out, let's try "Because he's on the Supreme Court" for $200, Alex,
 
Simply continue to find out what is going on, do it well and thoroughly. Let the facts speak for what will come about. This has everything to do with who and what we are, and what we will do to ourselves, give up, allow...

One must read what isn't being said.

They say that nobody is currently listening to your phone conversation, but that doesn't mean that it isn't stored and accessible should they feel a "need" to listen.

They say that nobody is checking your book list from the library, but that doesn't mean that it isn't readily available if they feel the need, or that they won't do it then get the warrant later if, and only if, they feel the need to incarcerate you.

They say that "I first heard this on the news this Friday", it doesn't mean that the sentence when you remove "on the news" is accurate also. We all first heard it "on the news" that Friday, however that doesn't mean it was the first time any of us heard it at all. Had we heard it through a friend on the preceding Tuesday, the statement that we first heard it "on the news" on Friday would still be accurate, but it doesn't actually answer the question that was asked, "When did you first hear about this?" does it?
 
That is exactly what I've been saying. Investigate thoroughly. And should impeachment come, the Senate had better well be in GOP control at that time. Because even if the evidence is compelling, you think Dingy Harry and Co. are going to convict Obama??
 
I've read over a dozen articles over the last 3 years about other federal judges doing the exact same things. Why are you only going after Thomas? because he's a conservative? because he's black?

Show me!

I wouldn't care if he was a purple communist. Wrong is wrong. Because someone else is a bully/crook/liar/rapist/fill in the blank for any crime you like, does not make it right.
If any other Justices are or have done the same thing, I would happily impeach them as well.

As I said, show me anyone else.
 
Back
Top