Conservative Arguments No longer apply

No. a tax is not essentially a tariff. Their essences are disparate.


A tariff is a fee on imported goods. Goods produced here would not be subject to this, so there would be more production jobs here, in accordance with the rules of markets. This is basic stuff, jizzbox.

It's essentially the same thing. The government imposes a cost on business, and as a result that curtails the business.

I really that I have you in a corner now but that's no reason to divert the subject and talk about gay sex.
 
So we should scurry around like scared little rats, afraid to make pro usa trade policy?

You're a little bitch, you know that?
It is you who are scurrying, but I've got you in a corner and sharp toes on my boots.

Again: Care to address the issue? You propose a tariff, which is a tax, to curtail foreign jobs, yet you don't recognize that a tax on corporations curtails jobs here.
 
It is you who are scurrying, but I've got you in a corner and sharp toes on my boots.

Again: Care to address the issue? You propose a tariff, which is a tax, to curtail foreign jobs, yet you don't recognize that a tax on corporations curtails jobs here.

Your thinking is all off. This particular "tax" incentivizes local production by making foreign goods prohibitively expensive, thus CREATING jobs here.


Why would the chinese care about our policy? you're the one who is concerned about their opinion. Tell us why they care.
 
Your thinking is all off. This particular "tax" incentivizes local production by making foreign goods prohibitively expensive, thus CREATING jobs here.
Therefore taxing our corporations here has the same effect, whereas local production is punished and foreign goods become relatively cheap. Wouldn't you agree, my bitch? :)
 
Therefore taxing our corporations here has the same effect, whereas local production is punished and foreign goods become relatively cheap. Wouldn't you agree, my bitch? :)

Im for low corporate taxes. And tariffs will only apply to imports. Companies choosing to produce here will be unscathed, that's the behavior we're trying to encourage with this policy.

Your head is backwards and up your ass.
 
Why should corporations pay any, my big government bitch?

Tariffs are not "big government". The costs of tariffs are embedded into the products, so corporations don't actually pay them, people do. So people will choose the cheaper domestically made product. This will incentivize local production, and save americans by keeping our wealth in our nation, instead of impoverishing ourselves with globalist stupidity.
 
You failed to answer the question. Don't you like the answer?

Corporations should pay tariffs because otherwise the social engineering aspects of the tariff concept do not come to fruition. Most often they pass the costs along to consumers anyway. I wouldn't worry about corporations doing well, if i were you. They are considered too big to fail. It's the workers who have been designated as disposable. your concerns are out of kilter.
 
It's the workers who have been designated as disposable.

Isn't this the *&^%$# truth of the day!
 
Corporations should pay tariffs because otherwise the social engineering aspects of the tariff concept do not come to fruition. Most often they pass the costs along to consumers anyway. I wouldn't worry about corporations doing well, if i were you. They are considered too big to fail. It's the workers who have been designated as disposable. your concerns are out of kilter.

Same as a tariff.
 
Back
Top