Conservative Arguments No longer apply

Sammy Jankis

Sammy Jankis

Was it me?
Even in the face of globalist trade policy which is pitting american workers against overseas slaves, or simply workers in a nation with a lower cost of living, conservatives still maintain that tax cuts will create jobs. This argument no longer works, because taxes are NOT the only reason jobs are going overseas.

We need protectionism to save jobs in america, but since conservatives have been brainwashed by internationalist fascists they are unable to understand and vocalize the appropriate protectionist policies.

Conservatives, please deprogram yourselves from the globalist brainwash memes with which you have been infected.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Even in the face of globalist trade policy which is pitting american workers against overseas slaves, or simply workers in a nation with a lower cost of living, conservatives still maintain that tax cuts will create jobs. This argument no longer works, because taxes are NOT the only reason jobs are going overseas.

We need protectionism to save jobs in america, but since conservatives have been brainwashed by internationalist fascists they are unable to understand and vocalize the appropriate protectionist policies.

Conservatives, please deprogram yourselves from the globalist brainwash memes with which you have been infected.
Click to expand...

Which means so much, coming from a bigoted racist who believes the "mongrol races" are trying to destroy "white purity".
 
Damn Yankee said:
No, we need to cut the corporate tax rate to zero and make collective bargaining illegal.
Click to expand...

But still, chinese slaves will be available for cents an hour. Taxes and nonexistant union phantoms are no longer tenable or accurate arguments, like I said.

Try again, brainwash victim.

This is so easy.
 
AssHatZombie said:
But still, chinese slaves will be available for cents an hour. Taxes and nonexistant union phantoms are no longer tenable or accurate arguments, like I said.

Try again, brainwash victim.

This is so easy.
Click to expand...

Mine's the "less government" solution and therefore bound to succeed, while yours is "more government" and therefore bound to fail.:)
 
AssHatZombie said:
No. Im saying YOUR arguments are just an ad hominem attack, having nothing to with the subject matter of the thread. I hope this clears up your confusion.:)
Click to expand...

Then you must have been admitting that you ARE nothing more then a bigoted racist who believes the "mongrol races" are trying to destroy "white purity".

Way to go, fuck head.
 
Damn Yankee said:
Mine's the "less government" solution and therefore bound to succeed, while yours is "more government" and therefore bond to fail.
Click to expand...

You really are a robot aren't you? Tariffs or eliminating trade partners do not cost anything to implement. They're not government expenditures. They're not "big government", they're just standard tools of modern statehood and trade policy..
 
AssHatZombie said:
You really are a robot aren't you? Tariffs or eliminating trade partners do not cost anything to implement. They're not government expenditures. They're not "big government", they're just standard tools of modern statehood and trade policy..
Click to expand...
Actually they do cost a lot to enforce, plus they tend to piss off folks we needn't piss off.
 
Damn Yankee said:
Actually they do cost a lot to enforce, plus they tend to piss off folks we needn't piss off.
Click to expand...

Actually no they really dont cost a lot to enforce...


Who would be pissed off by us having reasonable trade policy?

And is fear the best basis on which to create policy?
 
AssHatZombie said:
Actually no they really dont cost a lot to enforce...


Who would be pissed off by us having reasonable trade policy?

And is fear the best basis on which to create policy?
Click to expand...
My turn: yes they do cost a lot.

What seems reasonable to you might not seem reasonable to them. What type of tariff would you support? Perhaps 35%?
 
Damn Yankee said:
My turn: yes they do cost a lot.

What seems reasonable to you might not seem reasonable to them. What type of tariff would you support? Perhaps 35%?
Click to expand...


No. they're not a lot to implement.

Who's them, and why should we care what them think? Our trade policies should be conducted according to our line of thinking. You sound like a wishy washy moral relativist lib all the sudden.


Why are you operating from a place of fear?
 
AssHatZombie said:
No. they're not a lot to implement.

Who's them, and why should we care what them think? Our trade policies should be conducted according to our line of thinking. You sound like a wishy washy moral relativist lib all the sudden.


Why are you operating from a place of fear?
Click to expand...
I see you ignored my question. What do you fear? :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top