Congresswoman Ilhan Omar attacked during town hall.

There is no proof of scam.
There's plenty of evidence that points to it being a scam. No "brick and mortar" location. No identifiable vineyards producing the necessary grapes. Website and internet pages scrubbed thoroughly to remove all evidence of the business once it was called a "scam." No paper trail of sales, employee records, or other business-related documents.

That pretty much screams "SCAM!" to any reasonable person.
 
There's plenty of evidence that points to it being a scam. No "brick and mortar" location. No identifiable vineyards producing the necessary grapes. Website and internet pages scrubbed thoroughly to remove all evidence of the business once it was called a "scam." No paper trail of sales, employee records, or other business-related documents.

That pretty much screams "SCAM!" to any reasonable person.
And no license to produce alcohol ever.
 
There's plenty of evidence that points to it being a scam. No "brick and mortar" location. No identifiable vineyards producing the necessary grapes. Website and internet pages scrubbed thoroughly to remove all evidence of the business once it was called a "scam." No paper trail of sales, employee records, or other business-related documents.

That pretty much screams "SCAM!" to any reasonable person.
Because you say so?

 
Because you say so?

Because for a reasonable person, a real business has a verifiable location where it operates from, maintains records of things like employee pay, and has things like actual inventory. A winery requires vineyards for grapes. A winery requires a building to turn those grapes into wine that's full of equipment to do that. A winery has a stock of bottled product that is tangible.

Omar's operation has none of that.

These are real wineries:

R.f45e4171eb5cc9fcedab554346620f9f


12-stone-tower-wineries-social.jpg


This is the most Ilhan Omar has to show for her winery:

d4fe7ee48406f213c63fb667bd2d3704ac-wine-fraud-annotated-image-02--1-.w710.jpg




A reasonable person would conclude that a "business" lacking anything that would make it a business is probably not a business. Further, if they saw that said non-business was courting investors and raking in piles of cash from somewhere that the likelihood that the business is a scam is approaching 100%.

Would you invest in a business that had nothing but the owner's word that it was a business going for it? I know I wouldn't.
 
Because for a reasonable person, a real business has a verifiable location where it operates from, maintains records of things like employee pay, and has things like actual inventory. A winery requires vineyards for grapes. A winery requires a building to turn those grapes into wine that's full of equipment to do that. A winery has a stock of bottled product that is tangible.

Omar's operation has none of that.

A reasonable person would conclude that a "business" lacking anything that would make it a business is probably not a business. Further, if they saw that said non-business was courting investors and raking in piles of cash from somewhere that the likelihood that the business is a scam is approaching 100%.

Would you invest in a business that had nothing but the owner's word that it was a business going for it? I know I wouldn't.
I see no source. No links.

Did you read the article I posted?
 
I see no source. No links.

Did you read the article I posted?
Yes. Sounds like a scam to me. Normally, in business, you can produce records of earnings and losses that are precise, not something like "earned between $15,000 and $50,000 dollars..." That is so grossly inaccurate as to represent either a guess or bullshit pulled out of your ass. That's the sort of numbers a business reporting to the IRS ends up audited and people going to prison for it.

Oh, I don't need sources or links beyond what you've posted yourself to figure those things out.

As for "evidence," the article says that too. So far, the only sort of evidence that's missing is the sort courts need to bring charges and prosecutors need to get convictions. But, as it's often said, Where's there's smoke, there's fire. It looks like this is headed towards lots of evidence coming out that does result in charges. Omar's winery and her latest hubby are already being sued by investors for defrauding them. That doesn't look good.


View: https://twitter.com/i/status/2016656314592563399


Even the Biden administration questioned Omar's business activities:




When you investors and silent business partners start suing you for defrauding them, there's a damn good chance YOU ARE DEFRAUDING THEM!
 
Last edited:
Yes. Sounds like a scam to me. Normally, in business, you can produce records of earnings and losses that are precise, not something like "earned between $15,000 and $50,000 dollars..." That is so grossly inaccurate as to represent either a guess or bullshit pulled out of your ass. That's the sort of numbers a business reporting to the IRS ends up audited and people going to prison for it.

Oh, I don't need sources or links beyond what you've posted yourself to figure those things out.

As for "evidence," the article says that too. So far, the only sort of evidence that's missing is the sort courts need to bring charges and prosecutors need to get convictions. But, as it's often said, Where's there's smoke, there's fire. It looks like this is headed towards lots of evidence coming out that does result in charges. Omar's winery and her latest hubby are already being sued by investors for defrauding them. That doesn't look good.


View: https://twitter.com/i/status/2016656314592563399


Even the Biden administration questioned Omar's business activities:




When you investors and silent business partners start suing you for defrauding them, there's a damn good chance YOU ARE DEFRAUDING THEM!
No citation needed?

Except the people who keep your brain full of Putin ass pudding huh
 
During a town hall a man sprayed Ilhan Omar with an unknown liquid. The man was arrested for assault. She appears to be OK.



Political theater
 
Yes. Sounds like a scam to me. Normally, in business, you can produce records of earnings and losses that are precise, not something like "earned between $15,000 and $50,000 dollars..." That is so grossly inaccurate as to represent either a guess or bullshit pulled out of your ass. That's the sort of numbers a business reporting to the IRS ends up audited and people going to prison for it.
Gosh T.A. It's almost like you are in a cult and don't have a clue as to what reality really is.
Public disclosure forms filled out by politicians are where the range is and that range is defined by law.

Shouldn't you be complaining about Trump's disclosures since they are even more outrageous.
Trump claims his one bank account has a value of $100,001 - $250,000. (Who can't look at their exact bank balance on any given day?)

Trump claimed his income from one fund he owns is $50,001 - $100,000.
Shouldn't he know the earnings from that fund? Funds are required to give him quarterly reports.

Trump claims his income from US treasuries was $100,001 to $1,000,000
Shouldn't Trump know his earnings from US treasuries? They give annual reports.


Or perhaps the problem is you are so deep in your cult that you think the cult leader is exempt from your criticisms of others not in the cult.
 
Back
Top