Congress Cements Cold War 2

The only stories I see indicate they are moving forward, do you have a source?

Here is one. There are plenty others.

Canada says TPP trade deal dead without United States http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-trade-canada-idUSKBN1582P3



Now, here is one from May. Pay particular attention to what is being said. "Canada and 10 other countries agreed this weekend to re-evaluate the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the controversial trade deal that has been assumed dead since the U.S. pulled out in January.

However a Canadian group opposed to the TPP says the deal should not be revived.

Trade officials said the deal would change significantly without American involvement, although leaders from the 11 remaining countries are still figuring out what a revised trade plan would look like.

In its current form, the partnership requires U.S. participation before it can go into effect. But a revised TPP wouldn’t be as simple as taking the U.S. out of the existing deal: each of the 11 remaining countries will have to re-evaluate its own trade needs absent of American involvement." http://www.torontosun.com/2017/05/21/canada-other-countries-will-move-forward-on-new-trans-pacific-partnership-after-us-withdrawal
 
Yep, and they were wrong. Withdrawing from TPP is a massive benefit to China. Obama knew this and that's why he supported it till the end. Don't you miss having actual leaders?
TPP was garbage.
Obama was following the same "free trade" agenda that benefitted the globalists.

feel free to start another thread, but in regards to China their Russian military alliance is a far
bigger problem then US joining the TPP or not
 
Here is one. There are plenty others.

Canada says TPP trade deal dead without United States http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-trade-canada-idUSKBN1582P3



Now, here is one from May. Pay particular attention to what is being said. "Canada and 10 other countries agreed this weekend to re-evaluate the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the controversial trade deal that has been assumed dead since the U.S. pulled out in January.

However a Canadian group opposed to the TPP says the deal should not be revived.

Trade officials said the deal would change significantly without American involvement, although leaders from the 11 remaining countries are still figuring out what a revised trade plan would look like.

In its current form, the partnership requires U.S. participation before it can go into effect. But a revised TPP wouldn’t be as simple as taking the U.S. out of the existing deal: each of the 11 remaining countries will have to re-evaluate its own trade needs absent of American involvement." http://www.torontosun.com/2017/05/2...trans-pacific-partnership-after-us-withdrawal
That was from January, they apparently changed their minds
 
Which say the exact same thing as May. All talk. No action. As I said earlier, when they have have to put up the monies a big change in attitude.
Sailor, that's what contract, trade negotiation are and they take time. Look how long TPP took. I don't know what will happen with negotiation, but they appear to be trying, whether they achieve an agreement is another matter, but it isn't dead, yet.
 
Sailor, that's what contract, trade negotiation are and they take time. Look how long TPP took. I don't know what will happen with negotiation, but they appear to be trying, whether they achieve an agreement is another matter, but it isn't dead, yet.

I know what negotiations are. Unfortunately. We shall see what happens right?
 
The Chinese-Russian relationship is a stable strategic partnership and by no means a marriage of convenience: it is complex, sturdy, and deeply rooted.
Changes in international relations since the end of the Cold War have only brought the two countries closer together.
Some Western analysts and officials have speculated (and perhaps even hoped) that the ongoing conflicts in Syria and Ukraine, in which Russia has become heavily involved, would lead to tensions between Beijing and Moscow—or even a rupture. But that has not happened.

they support the idea of a multipolar world against American dominance, Moscow and Beijing will also tacitly back each others’ attempts to defend their own spheres of influence, said Dmitry Trenin, director of the Carnegie Moscow Centre. In the past two years, Russia has annexed Crimea and backed a separatist campaign to frustrate Ukraine’s turn to the west, and China has been disputing islands with western allies in the South China Sea.
“China admits de facto that Russia has interests in eastern Europe, Russia admits that China has interests around the perimeter of its borders, and even though neither will actively help its partner in Ukraine or the South China Sea, both will observe an advantageous neutrality,” Trenin said. “There won’t be criticism of each other in the areas of their core interests.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/07/china-russia-superpower-axis
 
China recently carried out a flight test of a new anti-satellite missile that highlights the growing threat of Beijing's space warfare capabilities.
The flight test of the Dong Neng-3 direct ascent missile was tracked by U.S. intelligence agencies on July 23 from China's Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in Inner Mongolia, in northwestern China, said U.S. defense officials familiar with reports of the launch.
The officials said the launch was not successful and the DN-3 appeared to malfunction in the upper atmosphere after the launch at night

The launch took place after Chinese authorities posted a notice to airlines to avoid flying near the flight path of the missile. The missile's flight was captured in photographs and video by several Chinese internet users near the Jiuquan facility.
Despite the failure, China's space warfare program is said to be advancing rapidly as an asymmetric warfare weapon that will allow a less capable Chinese military to defeat the U.S. military in a future conflict.
The Pentagon's annual report on the Chinese military states that in December the Chinese created a new Strategic Support Force that will unify space, cyber, and electronic warfare capabilities.
"The PLA continues to strengthen its military space capabilities despite its public stance against the militarization of space, " the report said.
Air Force Gen. John E. Hyten, commander of the U.S. Strategic Command and a space warfare expert, said both China and Russia are advancing space-war fighting capabilities.
"China right now is ahead of Russia because they've been on a consistent path for a longer time,"
Hyten said in an interview in Omaha last week

Hyten said the U.S. military currently has a "very robust space capability."
"And the threats that we face are actually very small," he said.
However, the significant U.S. advantage in space is eroding and satellites are becoming more vulnerable to attack.
"We have very old space capabilities too, very effective space capabilities, but they are very old and not built for a contested environment," he said.
The space warfare threat is "a much nearer-term issue for the commander after me, and for the commander after that person, it will be more significant because the gap is narrowing quickly and we have got to move quickly to respond to it," Hyten said.
In addition to several direct-ascent anti-satellite missiles, China is developing ground-based lasers that can blind or damage orbiting satellites, as well as small robot satellites that can maneuver, grab, and destroy orbiting satellites


The U.S. military does not have a deployed anti-satellite missile. However, in 2008 the military used a modified SM-3 anti-missile interceptor to shoot down a falling intelligence satellite as it reentered the atmosphere. The operation, code-named Burnt Frost, showed that the Pentagon could rapidly retool for anti-satellite warfare. The operation came a year after China's major anti-satellite test on the weather satellites.
The Air Force also developed the ASM-135 during the 1980s. The anti-satellite missile was launched from an F-15 jet.
Congress banned anti-satellite missile tests against targets in space in 1985.
Michael J. Listner, a space expert, said the latest DN-3 test shows China is developing space weaponry while pursuing soft power initiatives aimed at banning such arms.
*
"It's unclear when such a system will become operational, but the question remains once its ASAT reaches operational capability whether current strategies to ‘deter' the use of ASATs will be effective, to include the idea of resilience to discourage interference," said Listner, head of the company Space Law and Policy Solutions.
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/china-carries-flight-test-anti-satellite-missile/
"It is clear like the situation in the South China Sea that China's intentions for outer space should be gauged by their actions, including the continued development of ASATs, and not their propaganda."
Rick Fisher, senior fellow in Asian military affairs at the International Assessm
 
U.S. spy agencies detected the Chinese military launching a series of 20 missiles at mock targets designed to look like American THAAD missile batteries and advanced U.S. Air Force F-22 stealth fighter jets.
China has long protested the deployment of U.S. THAAD anti-ballistic missiles to South Korea, and doubled down on its condemnation after the government in Seoul said they want four more American launchers over the weekend, following North Korea’s Friday test of a second KN-20 intercontinental ballistic missile, a record-setting launch that flew the farthest distance in the regime's history.
Officials believe the Chinese military tested intermediate, medium and cruise missiles and say the tests were also meant to coincide with China’s Army Day celebrations on Aug. 1, when China staged a massive military parade involving 12,000 troops in the desert along with dozens of tanks, jets and missiles. Chinese state media said it was the first time China ever celebrated Army Day with a parade, attended by Chinese President Xi Jinping and Beijing’s military chief.
China currently has as many destroyers, crusiers and submarines as the U.S. Navy. Beijing recently put a new type of destroyer in the water which analysts say rivals advanced American Arleigh Burke-class destroyers.
Days before the China missile tests on Saturday, U.S. military satellites also detected a failed attempt of China’s anti-ballistic missile system -- Beijing’s version of the U.S. THAAD system.
At the State Department on Tuesday, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told reporters the U.S. and China are at a “pivot point” in history.
Tillerson acknowledged differences between the super powers over the North Korea issue and Beijing’s continued construction of military bases on man-made islands in the South China Sea.
“We will deal with those differences in a way that does not lead to open conflict,” Tillerson vowed.
China's U.N. envoy said this week it’s up to the U.S. and North Korea, not Beijing, to reduce tensions and work toward resuming talks to end Pyongyang's nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile programs.
Tillerson said Tuesday “at some point” he would be open for talks with North Korea.
One day after North Korea’s record-setting intercontinental ballistic missile launch
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/08/02/china-tests-missiles-during-weekend-us-officials-say.html
 
Back
Top