Confirmation Hearing live: Judge Amy Barrett

Previously I was impressed by both Graham and Feinstein, more so by Graham.
 
Previously I was impressed by both Graham and Feinstein, more so by Graham.
Graham is an idiot, another Senator who needs to retire if he isn’t retired by Jamie Harrison. I think most of the Republican Senators are past their due dates.
 
Graham is an idiot, another Senator who needs to retire if he isn’t retired by Jamie Harrison. I think most of the Republican Senators are past their due dates.

He might be after this election due to the "Trump Effect". LOL

Agreed on Republican Senators, but that applies as well to Democrats. Asking Senators or Representatives to set term limits is like asking wolves what they think about sheepdogs.
 
She is saying the same old bullshit. Trump said he would nominate someone who would be on his side in an election case, on his side in Roe V Wade and his side on the ACA. He picked through judges until he interviewed one who agreed. Now she is suddenly neutral and her mind is not made up. Total lies. She has already established who she is by agreeing to Trump's standards. Yeah, the old balls and strikes shit . The game has been predetermined. The fix is in.
 
You have to have zero life to watch a fait accompli question avoidance kabuki dance with a right wing Christian ideologue
telling you all the righteous reasons her own confirmation hearings are of no use whatsoever because she can't answer all the questions you care about
but already know the answers to.

She will vote to overturn Roe, she will vote to make gay marriage illegal, she will vote to shove Jesus in my kids classroom, she vote to overturn
the affordable care act and duck every uncomfortable challenge to big business as a political question, or lacking standing, or lacking controversy, or
claiming federalism requires restraint, etc...

She is on the court, and we will dilute it with 5 liberals as Merrick Garland payback to your treasonous Senate.
 
Last edited:
She is saying the same old bullshit. Trump said he would nominate someone who would be on his side in an election case, on his side in Roe V Wade and his side on the ACA. He picked through judges until he interviewed one who agreed. Now she is suddenly neutral and her mind is not made up. Total lies. She has already established who she is by agreeing to Trump's standards. Yeah, the old balls and strikes shit . The game has been predetermined. The fix is in.

cry harder for me

you should have won the 2016 election then you too could have had three judges and flipped the script

but instead you are left bloviating about packing the court
 
She is saying the same old bullshit. Trump said he would nominate someone who would be on his side in an election case, on his side in Roe V Wade and his side on the ACA. He picked through judges until he interviewed one who agreed. Now she is suddenly neutral and her mind is not made up. Total lies. She has already established who she is by agreeing to Trump's standards. Yeah, the old balls and strikes shit . The game has been predetermined. The fix is in.

Disagreed. She's a straight shooter. Trump picked her for political reasons, but that's not her fault. Trump picked her because, in his delusional world, he thought she was someone he could dominate and read her mind. Again, just because Trump is a drug-addicted mentally ill nutjob that doesn't mean Judge Barrett would violate her oath.

FWIW, she's going to be confirmed no matter how many lies are told about her on both sides. That's the reality.
 
oh you are so witty

no meme?

Well, since you're being so nice:

4e6ko1.jpg
 
You have to have zero life to watch a fait accompli question avoidance kabuki dance with a right wing Christian ideologue
telling you all the righteous reasons her own confirmation hearings are of no use whatsoever because she can't answer all the questions you care about
but already know the answers to.

She will vote to overturn Roe, she will vote to make gay marriage illegal, she will vote to shove Jesus in my kids classroom, she vote to overturn
the affordable care act and duck every uncomfortable challenge to big business as a political question, or lacking standing, or lacking controversy, or
claiming federalism requires restraint, etc...

She is on the court, and we will dilute it with 5 liberals as Merrick Garland payback to your treasonous Senate.

Awesome display of everything that is wrong with the Democratic party: Misogynistic, homophobic, dishonest Religion haters.
 
Graham is a term-limits case.

So is Dick Durbin, but the polls have him 10 points ahead....probably in part due to the Trump Effect.


Durbin is blaming guns for the actions of his own constituents. He's blaming gang violence not on city leaders, but on inanimate objects.

Durbin says he doesn't want activist judges then explains why he wants activist judges. LOL
 
I am most impressed with the senators that said right up front- "THIS IS A POWER GRAB".

And I am most impressed with the senators that said, "If you do not like the way we Republicans are voting to send this nominee through to the Supreme court, then the voters can vote us out of office"! THANKS FOR THE ADVICE- BUT I AM ALREADY GOING TO DO WHAT I CAN TO DO EXACTLY THAT!

What will go down in history, is the Republicans will uses their power to grab another seat on the Supreme Court in less than two weeks away from an election.

And this will establish a precedent that will come back to haunt the Republicans given time. Because what power grabs are good for the Republicans are also good for the Democrats.

Power grab #1 for the Democrats when they take back the senate and the executive branch, is to instill term limits on all public offices- including Congress and the Judicial branch.

The idea that, the rules that apply to the executive powers allowing a president to nominate a justice nominee to the Supreme Court during an upcoming election, after the voting is already in progress seems to be different for Republicans than it is for the Democrats. as the Senate Leader makes the rules up as he goes.

So, therefore, POWER GRAB #2 by a newly elected Senate Majority can legislate new laws to make the rules the same for Democrats and Republicans for all upcoming presidents that take office by establishing a cutoff date for nominating Justices to the Supreme Court during an election year.

IN FACT, THERE ARE A WHOLE LOT OF POWER GRABBING THAT WILL OCCUR, DURING THE NEXT FOUR YEARS NO MATTER WHO IS ELECTED.

SO ALL OF THIS COMES DOWN TO VOTING IN THIS ELECTION.

EARLY VOTING BEGINS TODAY IN MY STATE- I WILL BE VOTING TOMORROW- NO MATTER HOW LONG THE LINE- NO MATTER HOW DANGEROUS IT WILL BE TO STAND IN LINE WITH OTHERS WITH THIS PANDEMIC STILL INFECTING THOUSANDS EVERY DAY IN MANY STATES INCLUDING MINE.

SO DEMOCRATS IF YOU WANT TO SEE YOUR LEADERS DO SOME POWER GRABBING OF THEIR OWN OVER THE NEXT 4- 8 YEARS, YOU BETTER GET YOUR ASSES OUT TO VOTE- AND TAKE EVERY PERSON IN YOUR FAMILY- OF VOTING AGE- WITH YOU WHEN YOU GO.

DEMOCRATS, IF YOU ARE SICK AND TIRED OF THE POWER GRABBING BY THE HYPOCRITE REPUBLICANS, GET YOUR ASSES OUT TO VOTE- AND VOTE THESE POWER HUNGRY MOTHER-FUCKERS OUT OF OFFICE.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top