Diesel
Well-known member
Poles & Irish aren't much more, or much less victims of Human history than Blacks, Koreans, Jews, LGBTQ etc.
Not human history. You. You are not a victim. Stop playing one.
Poles & Irish aren't much more, or much less victims of Human history than Blacks, Koreans, Jews, LGBTQ etc.
Not human history. You. You are not a victim. Stop playing one.
Wrong.
Many White peoples suffered too.
It sounds racist of Leftists like you to think all Whites are privileged.
Like we are untouchable God's who can't suffer.
Roman, YOU. Not human history, you fat bitch.
Prejudices aren't color blind.
Whites aren't immune.
Although I'll admit routine prejudices against Poles & Irish are dehumanizing.
It's hardly the biggest of issues.
Roman, you brainless fucking asshole, I'm talking about YOU. You're pretending to be a victim because some white people are sometimes victims. You're such a fucking pussy.
Blacks are pu$$ys.
I told one Blacks are good dancers & he got upset
Meanwhile dumb Polak slurs & jokes I hear all the time are just fine.
You're drunk.
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Man, you do try to blow smoke up everyone's keister with this generalized dodge of yours. Stay focused, toodles....T.A. Gardner made an incorrect statement because he either didn't read the link in it's entirety or chose to ignore what he didn't like and lied.
He was wrong. And of course, you are wrong in following suit.
Disagreed on all points. Gardner questioned a standard Cancel Culture POV.
FWIW, as others have seen before on this forum, it's better to let people prove themselves fools than call them fools. All they need is a little encouragement to reveal their true face. Thanks!![]()
Would dumb Negrow jokes be politically correct like dumb Polak jokes are?
Pay attention, toodles. This is how I set your boy Gardner straight https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...te-property-in-New-York&p=4125828#post4125828
Your doubling down on your self aggrandizing BS convinces only the person you see in the mirror and like minded right wing trolls like yourself. The objective, rational reader knows better. Carry on.
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Pay attention, toodles. This is how I set your boy Gardner straight https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...28#post4125828
Your doubling down on your self aggrandizing BS convinces only the person you see in the mirror and like minded right wing trolls like yourself. The objective, rational reader knows better. Carry on.
I'll need your claim that I'm a RW troll notarized because all the JPP RW trolls keep threatening to throw me out of the club.
You can play all the word games you like, but the fact remains the situation isn't as Black & White (no pun intended) as you want to make it.
First of all, you talk the talk, you get the label....TFB if you don't like it, but in this particular discussion you deserve it.
Secondly, only people with poor reading comprehension or a serious revisionist bent (or who just like to argue for arguments sake) would say "... the situation isn't as Black & White". after reading the thread subject title and then the following; https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...te-property-in-New-York&p=4124521#post4124521 This makes the subject title a LIE, much less innaccurate. Deal with it.
ROFLMAO. Lemme guess, you took me off "ignore" just to take a peek?Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
First of all, you talk the talk, you get the label....TFB if you don't like it, but in this particular discussion you deserve it.
Secondly, only people with poor reading comprehension or a serious revisionist bent (or who just like to argue for arguments sake) would say "... the situation isn't as Black & White". after reading the thread subject title and then the following; https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...21#post4124521 This makes the subject title a LIE, much less innaccurate. Deal with it.
Your anger and prejudices are mildly interesting but, sorry, others are more interesting.You'd guess wrong, as I didn't have you on IA. The previous response stands valid, and you can't logically or factually disprove or refute it.
You can get up and dust your butt off now.
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
You'd guess wrong, as I didn't have you on IA. The previous response stands valid, and you can't logically or factually disprove or refute it.
You can get up and dust your butt off now.
Your anger and prejudices are mildly interesting but, sorry, others are more interesting.
What do you think you've won? The Internet for a day?
What exactly am I "prejudiced" about? All I've done is logically and factually disprove this thread's subject title and subsequently dismantled the fantasy that there is some justification for the Confederate flag being flown today...much less any nonsense that it has nothing to do with slavery.
I never claimed "victory"....I just stated the obvious in a post that cannot be refuted or logically disproved. Don't get pissed at me....it is what it is.
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
What exactly am I "prejudiced" about? All I've done is logically and factually disprove this thread's subject title and subsequently dismantled the fantasy that there is some justification for the Confederate flag being flown today...much less any nonsense that it has nothing to do with slavery.
I never claimed "victory"....I just stated the obvious in a post that cannot be refuted or logically disproved. Don't get pissed at me....it is what it is.
Anyone who is interested in forbidden history.
A that is your first lie on this particular thread, my friend. Nowhere did I say that the history of the Confederacy shouldn't be studied....I'm just against the revisionist BS that births such things like the subject title of this thread. In other words, let's get the story straight. If you can logically or factually prove that I did otherwise, please do. If not, then just concede the point and move on. Or not. Your call.
Disagreed, but even if it was, it's still far less than yours.A that is your first lie on this particular thread, my friend. Nowhere did I say that the history of the Confederacy shouldn't be studied....I'm just against the revisionist BS that births such things like the subject title of this thread. In other words, let's get the story straight. If you can logically or factually prove that I did otherwise, please do. If not, then just concede the point and move on. Or not. Your call.
Pay attention, toodles. This is how I set your boy Gardner straight https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...te-property-in-New-York&p=4125828#post4125828
Your doubling down on your self aggrandizing BS convinces only the person you see in the mirror and like minded right wing trolls like yourself. The objective, rational reader knows better. Carry on.
First of all, you talk the talk, you get the label....TFB if you don't like it, but in this particular discussion you deserve it.
Secondly, only people with poor reading comprehension or a serious revisionist bent (or who just like to argue for arguments sake) would say "... the situation isn't as Black & White". after reading the thread subject title and then the following; https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...te-property-in-New-York&p=4124521#post4124521 This makes the subject title a LIE, much less innaccurate. Deal with it.