Comey testimony, Alright, let's take bets now

While you want to speculate and fabricate the idea that Trump pressured Comey into something, you seem to be willingly ignoring the FACT that Comey DID state that he felt Lynch did pressure him into dropping the Hillary investigation.

Why is that?

I'm not speculating or fabricating anything, Trumpsucker. It's obvious that Orangetweet endeavored to halt an ongoing investigation. He even contacted Coats and Rogers.

Get over Lynch and Clinton, asswipe. They are distant history. You have more pressing issues to shit yourself about.
 
I'm not speculating or fabricating anything, Trumpsucker. It's obvious that Orangetweet endeavored to halt an ongoing investigation. He even contacted Coats and Rogers.

Get over Lynch and Clinton, asswipe. They are distant history. You have more pressing issues to shit yourself about.

All you ever do is speculate and provide conjecture.
Facts mean nothing to you.

I can see why you want the Lynch / Hillary thing to go away and that's because it would break your little heart for it to be shown that Lynch protected Hillary and worked to get the investigation scuttled.

How Sad
 
lol

What a naive and illiterate and naive dumbfuck. Yeah, he said Trump wanted some sort of patronage relationship and the context of those words speak for themselves.

But a hack Trumpfuck like you can't see the forest.

You got eight more years. Time to man up and stop crying about losing an election.

It's over baby.
 
All you ever do is speculate and provide conjecture.
Facts mean nothing to you.

I can see why you want the Lynch / Hillary thing to go away and that's because it would break your little heart for it to be shown that Lynch protected Hillary and worked to get the investigation scuttled.

How Sad

Sure don't, Trumpsucker. That's your realm. The "ifs" and "woulds".

I'm just living this reality. Many of us recognized early on what Trump really was. A pathologically lying, bullying buffoon. Now we have it on record, under oath, in front of a Senate investigatory committee and the world. And now, with a Special Prosecutor. Sweet!
 
Sure don't, Trumpsucker. That's your realm. The "ifs" and "woulds".

I'm just living this reality. Many of us recognized early on what Trump really was. A pathologically lying, bullying buffoon. Now we have it on record, under oath, in front of a Senate investigatory committee and the world. And now, with a Special Prosecutor. Sweet!

But unfortunately; you're living in a "reality" that you've created, to make yourself feel better about your failures.
 
It's obvious that Orangetweet endeavored to halt an ongoing investigation.

Here we again for the umpteenth time.:palm:

1) again...Comey said that he never knew of anyone criminally charge for "hoping."

2) again...Comey said...(From the hearing text)
“I’m not a legal scholar, so smarter people have answered this better,” Comey explained, “but speaking as a legal matter, the president, as the head of the Executive Branch… and we have important norms against this…[can] direct that anybody can be investigated or anybody not be investigated.”
“I think he has the legal authority because, ultimately, we all report to the Executive Branch up to the president,” Comey confirmed.
“If he wanted to issue a direct order, he could do it in any way,” he finished.

***************************************************************

During his testimony Thursday, Comey confirmed comments made by Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz Wednesday evening that legally, the president can start or stop any investigation.

Famed Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz shot down claims of obstruction of justice Wednesday, telling CNN’s Anderson Cooper that presidents have the right to start or stop any investigation.

Dershowitz said that, constitutionally, a president may direct an intelligence agent to stop an investigation. The “best proof” of that fact, he says, is that Trump could’ve easily pardoned former national security advisor Michael Flynn and the entire investigation would have been over anyway.

“Trump could have told Comey, ‘You are commanded, you are directed, to drop the prosecution against Flynn.’ The president has the right to do that,” he explained. “Remember also what the president could’ve done. He could’ve said to Comey, ‘Stop this investigation, I am now pardoning Flynn. That’s what President Bush did.”

Dershowitz cited the case of Caspar Weinberger, who was pardoned by George H.W. Bush before he could be tried in relation to the Iran-Contra scandal.

“You cannot have obstruction of justice when the President exercises his constitutional authority to pardon, his constitutional authority to fire the director of the FBI, his constitutional authority to tell the director of the FBI who to prosecute, who not to prosecute,” Dershowitz elaborated.

“You don’t believe he was trying to influence of impede any possible or further investigation into Flynn?” Cooper asked.

“What I’m telling you is that even if he did want it to impede it, and even if he did impede it, that is his constitutional power. He has the right to say, ‘You will not investigate Flynn.'”
 
Here we again for the umpteenth time.:palm:

1) again...Comey said that he never knew of anyone criminally charge for "hoping."

2) again...Comey said...(From the hearing text)
“I’m not a legal scholar, so smarter people have answered this better,” Comey explained, “but speaking as a legal matter, the president, as the head of the Executive Branch… and we have important norms against this…[can] direct that anybody can be investigated or anybody not be investigated.”
“I think he has the legal authority because, ultimately, we all report to the Executive Branch up to the president,” Comey confirmed.
“If he wanted to issue a direct order, he could do it in any way,” he finished.

***************************************************************

During his testimony Thursday, Comey confirmed comments made by Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz Wednesday evening that legally, the president can start or stop any investigation.

Famed Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz shot down claims of obstruction of justice Wednesday, telling CNN’s Anderson Cooper that presidents have the right to start or stop any investigation.

Dershowitz said that, constitutionally, a president may direct an intelligence agent to stop an investigation. The “best proof” of that fact, he says, is that Trump could’ve easily pardoned former national security advisor Michael Flynn and the entire investigation would have been over anyway.

“Trump could have told Comey, ‘You are commanded, you are directed, to drop the prosecution against Flynn.’ The president has the right to do that,” he explained. “Remember also what the president could’ve done. He could’ve said to Comey, ‘Stop this investigation, I am now pardoning Flynn. That’s what President Bush did.”

Dershowitz cited the case of Caspar Weinberger, who was pardoned by George H.W. Bush before he could be tried in relation to the Iran-Contra scandal.

“You cannot have obstruction of justice when the President exercises his constitutional authority to pardon, his constitutional authority to fire the director of the FBI, his constitutional authority to tell the director of the FBI who to prosecute, who not to prosecute,” Dershowitz elaborated.

“You don’t believe he was trying to influence of impede any possible or further investigation into Flynn?” Cooper asked.

“What I’m telling you is that even if he did want it to impede it, and even if he did impede it, that is his constitutional power. He has the right to say, ‘You will not investigate Flynn.'”

Damn, you are one funny guy! Desperate. But humorous nonetheless.

Let's go over this one more time, bitch.

1) I heard the moronic question and Comey just gave a straightforward answer to the stupid fucking question. You're really fucking desperate on that "hoping" thing. It's amusing. Except the context in which Trump used it was as a directive, not throwing a penny in a wishing well. And Comey said as much. Not even a shitty try, bitch.

2) That's what the legal scholars say. But your lying cocksucker-of-a-hero didn't approach it that way, did he, bitch? He used intimidation in his endeavor to impede the investigation. Do you know where the words "endeavor to impede" are found? In the statute on obstruction of justice.

Dontcha just love it?
 
Damn, you are one funny guy! Desperate. But humorous nonetheless.

Let's go over this one more time, bitch.

1) I heard the moronic question and Comey just gave a straightforward answer to the stupid fucking question. You're really fucking desperate on that "hoping" thing. It's amusing. Except the context in which Trump used it was as a directive, not throwing a penny in a wishing well. And Comey said as much. Not even a shitty try, bitch.

2) That's what the legal scholars say. But your lying cocksucker-of-a-hero didn't approach it that way, did he, bitch? He used intimidation in his endeavor to impede the investigation. Do you know where the words "endeavor to impede" are found? In the statute on obstruction of justice.

Dontcha just love it?

Between 'hoping' and the fact POTUS has constitutional authority to end investigations, getting an obstruction charge to stick would be a miracle. I'm not even defense lawyer and I could poke holes into it just on the way Trump phrased his words.

And Trump would have some pretty good private sector lawyers going up against the public sector variety lol.

It would be a colossal waste of time and money. Give it up.
 
I'm not speculating or fabricating anything, Trumpsucker. It's obvious that Orangetweet endeavored to halt an ongoing investigation. He even contacted Coats and Rogers.

Get over Lynch and Clinton, asswipe. They are distant history. You have more pressing issues to shit yourself about.

OMG ... watching you have a meltdown is fucking hilarious :rofl2:
 
Between 'hoping' and the fact POTUS has constitutional authority to end investigations, getting an obstruction charge to stick would be a miracle. I'm not even defense lawyer and I could poke holes into it just on the way Trump phrased his words.

And Trump would have some pretty good private sector lawyers going up against the public sector variety lol.

It would be a colossal waste of time and money. Give it up.

You're comment made me realize that probably the very next thing the JPP liberal snowflakes are going to complain about, is that Trump is using 'Murican Tax Dollars to defend himself and that it should be coming out of his pocket.

:nonono:
 
OMG ... watching you have a meltdown is fucking hilarious :rofl2:

Here's how I picture domer, when he begins going off the deep end.

tantrum.gif


Now watch - He'll either post a similar item or have someone do it for him and claim that it's how sees me.

Wanna bet?

:evilnod:
 
Between 'hoping' and the fact POTUS has constitutional authority to end investigations, getting an obstruction charge to stick would be a miracle. I'm not even defense lawyer and I could poke holes into it just on the way Trump phrased his words.

And Trump would have some pretty good private sector lawyers going up against the public sector variety lol.

It would be a colossal waste of time and money. Give it up.

Lot's of "woulds" there, moron. Sign of a lost argument.

Why didn't Trump just publically end the investigation, pally boy? You tell us.
 
Back
Top