Comey case VERY likely to be dismissed.

[Jarod]

The Department of Justice made so many mistakes and the procurement of the indictment against Comi, that case is very likely to get dismissed. Such a dismissal is very rare in the federal system, however, such incompetence historically has been very rare with the Department of Justice.

If it happens, the Trumper will scream that it was the deep state and liberal judges.

Make me wonder if the legal experts knew the case was crap and indicted him anyway so they could complain about the deep state.

 

[TOP]

The Department of Justice made so many mistakes and the procurement of the indictment against Comi, that case is very likely to get dismissed. Such a dismissal is very rare in the federal system, however, such incompetence historically has been very rare with the Department of Justice.

If it happens, the Trumper will scream that it was the deep state and liberal judges.

Make me wonder if the legal experts knew the case was crap and indicted him anyway so they could complain about the deep state.

Is he innocent?

 

[Margot]

Is he innocent?

Of course! This is all MAGA hate!

 

[Jarod]

Is he innocent?

I don’t know, I suspect we will never get to the evidence.

I think the evidence, unless there’s something I don’t know about, is way to tenuous for a conviction to be likely.

From what I can see the confirming comments he made to Congress, for which he is indicted for, we’re not specifically related to the pryor comments which are alleged to have been a lie.

 

[TOP]

I don’t know, I suspect we will never get to the evidence.

I think the evidence, unless there’s something I don’t know about, is way to tenuous for a conviction to be likely.

From what I can see the confirming comments he made to Congress, for which he is indicted for, we’re not specifically related to the pryor comments which are alleged to have been a lie.

Then if there's any question , the chargers should not be dropped.... If he's innocent, you would think he would want to be proven to be so... That would show them...

 

[LurchAddams]

The Department of Justice made so many mistakes and the procurement of the indictment against Comi, that case is very likely to get dismissed. Such a dismissal is very rare in the federal system, however, such incompetence historically has been very rare with the Department of Justice.

If it happens, the Trumper will scream that it was the deep state and liberal judges.

Make me wonder if the legal experts knew the case was crap and indicted him anyway so they could complain about the deep state.

Great minds think alike.

Thread 'Lawyer Prosecuting Comey, Lindsey Halligan, is Fumbling the Case Royally'

Sep 28, 2025

For those of you who don't know - trump appointed a stooge prior to Halligan who could not find ad case against Comey - so trump fired the stooge and hire an EVEN BIGGER STOOGE, THIS Lindsey Halligan, who has zero prosecutorial experience and just embarrassed herself royally!

Trump's newly appointed U.S. attorney presented Comey case to grand jury on her own, source says

Senior prosecutors had told acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan that they didn't think there was enough evidence to secure an indictment.

www.nbcnews.com

"Newly appointed acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan presented the case to secure the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey on her own, according to a source...

• LurchAddams
• Replies: 16
• Forum: Current Events Forum

• 

 

[Jarod]

Then if there's any question , the chargers should not be dropped.... If he's innocent, you would think he would want to be proven to be so... That would show them...

No, you would just say it was a liberal jury.

As a practical matter, you want any case against you dismissed any way possible when that happens, you are legally innocent.

After the case has been dismissed, you can argue your non-legal innocence in other ways.

 

[TOP]

No, you would just say it was a liberal jury.

As a practical matter, you want any case against you dismissed, when that happens, you are legally innocent.

After the case has been dismissed, you can argue your non-legal innocence in other ways.

Do you think he's innocent?

 

[LurchAddams]

No career prosecutor would take the case against comey so trump and bondi had to go hire a "stooge" Lindsday Halligan an insurance lawyer with zero prosecutorial experience.

The Grand Jury only indicted 2 of the 3 charges - which is rare.

So many procedural mistakes by Halligan - she's getting laughed out of court.

 

[martin]

Do you think he's innocent?

You must mean "do you think he did not do what the indictment alleges." How would anyone not privy to the evidence, if there is evidence, know?

 

[LurchAddams]

Do you think he's innocent?

Do you understand that how our system of jurisprudence works? Before you answer - you'd better know - remember you claim to have been a teacher.

So here you go: In America's system of justice - what is the assumption of the status of every defendant prior to trial or conviction/non-conviction?

A teacher would know the answer.

 

[TOP]

You must mean "do you think he did not do what the indictment alleges." How would anyone not privy to the evidence, if there is evidence, know?

My question was to Jarod the lawyer... There must have been evidence...

 

[TOP]

Question is to Jarod... And I'm a retired teacher...

 

[martin]

My question was to Jarod the lawyer... There must have been evidence...

I'm a lawyer myself. I gave you a lawyer's reply.

 

[domer76]

The Department of Justice made so many mistakes and the procurement of the indictment against Comi, that case is very likely to get dismissed. Such a dismissal is very rare in the federal system, however, such incompetence historically has been very rare with the Department of Justice.

If it happens, the Trumper will scream that it was the deep state and liberal judges.

Make me wonder if the legal experts knew the case was crap and indicted him anyway so they could complain about the deep state.

I’ll be surprised if it isn’t. The question is, will he seek relief for the unconstitutional prosecution?

 

[domer76]

Is he innocent?

^Obviously ignorant of criminal law. No surprise there.

 

[domer76]

Then if there's any question , the chargers should not be dropped.... If he's innocent, you would think he would want to be proven to be so... That would show them...

In criminal law, there is no such thing as innocent. One is either guilty or not guilty.

Stop exposing your ignorance. We’ll all be better off.

 

[Jarod]

I’ll be surprised if it isn’t. The question is, will he seek relief for the unconstitutional prosecution?

I’m almost certain he will. Why would you expose yourself to the whims of a jury if you don’t have to?

Jerry usually get it right but a significant Number of them do not.

 

[TOP]

I’m almost certain he will. Why would you expose yourself to the whims of a jury if you don’t have to?

Jerry usually get it right but a significant Number of them do not.

If you're innocent why not? Let there
Be no question at all...

 

[Cypress]

The Department of Justice made so many mistakes and the procurement of the indictment against Comi, that case is very likely to get dismissed. Such a dismissal is very rare in the federal system, however, such incompetence historically has been very rare with the Department of Justice.

If it happens, the Trumper will scream that it was the deep state and liberal judges.

Make me wonder if the legal experts knew the case was crap and indicted him anyway so they could complain about the deep state.

Trump poisoned the case by directly ordering his AG to indict Comey.

That's Soviet Communist bullshit.