Monad Portal
Was it me?
so y'all are literally fine with child rape.
feminism has fucked you up.
how does this jibe with the gender is a social construct narrative?
you people are schizophrenic morons.
Colorado woman faces no jail time for statutory rape, pregnancy by 13-year-old boy
- Thread starter ExpressLane
- Start date
so y'all are literally fine with child rape.
feminism has fucked you up.
how does this jibe with the gender is a social construct narrative?
you people are schizophrenic morons.
So do I
. I have a few stories that happened when I went to summer camp in the province of Quebec, Canada when I was 11, around 36 years ago.I was attracted to numerous girls at the camp, had some nice experiences with several of them.
The first 2 were around my age. One was clearly pretty "advanced" when it came to sexuality, I clearly wasn't. So I held hands with her at one point, but that was about it.
The other was a tad older than me but she seemed fine with spending time with me. We slept next to each other in sleeping bags outside by a fire, I loved that.
The third one was both clearly more advanced than me sexually -and- was significantly older. Maybe as old as 17. I've always been a pretty serious type of person, even when young, and I think something about the way I was really attracted her. To the point that she asked me to go to the girl's part of camp. I was pretty sure she'd want to do things with me that would be frowned upon by society, so I declined. She was sent home early- it may be that I wasn't the only one she was seriously flirting with and perhaps some other boy didn't say no. I remember being with her as she got on the bus. She asked me to get on for a moment. I was pretty sure she'd want to give me a kiss or something, I knew this would be frowned upon, so again, I declined. Almost always doing my part to uphold societal rules back then.
There was -1- other incident where I didn't quite uphold the status quo though. 2 fairly young female councillors, probably early 20s, organized a canoe trip to a small island for a bunch of boys. I signed up.
Once we got there, we changed into swim suits (or maybe that's all we brought with us, it was warm) and went for a swim. Then they offered to take off their swim suits if we took off ours. All the boys but me and another kid took them up on the offer. I was still doing my part for societal mores. Then they got out of the water and took all the swim suits and dashed off into the forest to hide them. I still think it was rather funny how the boys didn't want to get out of the water themselves because they would expose themselves.
Anyway, once all the swim suits were hidden, it was time to deal with the 2 holdouts. By now, the boys joined in on the "everyone has to be naked" thing. The other boy was smaller and not that good of a swimmer, they caught him. I'd taken many swimming lessons and I went out further then they were willing to go. Eventually, though, I got bored and lonely being the sole holdout. Was upholding the status quo really worth it? I decided it wasn't and handed over my trunks.
I don't remember much of the rest of the day, other than one of the boys putting a frog on one of the councillors' butts and the councillors telling the boy off for it. I thought I'd never do that. Societal mores are one thing, but I thought the councillors were incredibly beautiful and what the boys did seemed downright unchivalrous.
Anyway, the next day, the councillors got all the swim suits, we all got dressed againd and headed back to the main camp site. The councillors were the last holdouts, not putting on their bikini tops until they saw the the head of the camp rowing towards them in a canoe of his own. I'd never thought of it until today, but now I wonder, was the head of the camp rowing towards us because we were actually only supposed to stay the day and come back that day? Who knows.
Anyway, I imagine the councillors knew that once word got out of this, they'd be let go. Perhaps they were on their last days there anyway and thought they'd go out with a bang.
I imagine that some people here may gasp and perhaps say that the councillors should have been sent to jail or whatever. All I know is that was the first time I saw 2 fully grown women naked and I loved it.
Last edited:
Nobody gave it a pass, you moron. It was rape even if the boy consented. I just think the parents should be investigated, too. What was going on in their house that they let the child spend nights with the teacher? You're so eager to own the libs that you haven't thought it through.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
That flies in the face of real life realities.
I used to be a thirteen year old boy.
Indeed.
It isn't a lie. Did you do your research yet?
He doesn't speak the for the left. He speaks for himself. Don't even pretend that JPP conservatives have any sort of moral high ground whatsoever.
Why not? Because the child's dick had to be hard?
Althea View Post
Yea. It's not acceptable to state the obvious.
That kid was in his glory.
Your fellow Lib says different
So if a gay 38 yo gay man has sex with a 13 yo gay boy, its not rape because the child may have liked it?
NAMBLA would agree
Folks u see why we need to keep certain people away from children
No, it doesn't. It's important that you know what the word means before you argue about its applicability.
unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent because of mental illness, mental deficiency, intoxication, unconsciousness, or deception
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rape
It is rape. I'm confused about your position in this thread. What is it?
His postion is
A female child can be raped
A male child can not be raped
Its very clear that many Libs think that way!
The law doesn't discriminate to account for boys being horny. It also doesn't discriminate to account for girls being horny no matter the proportionate contribution that horniness makes to the sexuality of girls versus boys.
I realize that you are "unadaptable" according to yourself, but the sexism really seems prehistoric.
I said, give me a source that is acceptable. I ignore sources like the bull shit source they gave here. Not my job to source someone else's comment. This is typical right wing nothing that they think defines what they are trying to sell. Which is generally a waste of time, having to do with nothing . This is a political forum. From Hunter Biden to Trump's wall, anything Woke, anything this hate groups says about LGBT, book burners, total waste of time.
So
A 13 yo old gay boy may like a 38 yo man gym teacher...so in your view if the man has sex with the child it wouldn't be rape if the boy liked it
Last edited:
Don't sabotage yourself by slipping into lazy generalities about "libs". You lose credibility when you become a partisan hack with no message other than, "Fuck the libs."
As far as APL's position goes, if I understand it correctly, then I'm opposed to it. Even Nifty, a sometimes self-proclaimed progressive, thinks that the boy's father should be high fiving him.
Men are not animals any more than women are animals. The double standard and the trashy congratulations among a few (not "many") posters is uncivilized and should not characterize the opinions of any group.
Then don't participate in a thread if you're going to insist on keeping your head under the sand.
The JPP MAGA cons are the lowest form of human life possible. Their only media source, FoKKKs, is also a force that exists for no other reason than to control their minds and spread hatred and evil. All that said, don't lazily walk into a thread, claim that it's all bullshit, and never look it up yourself or make any meaningful contribution to the discussion. That makes you as bad as they are. You've already been given multiple sources, but here are a few more. FYI, I'm visiting family this weekend 8 miles away from where this occurred. It happened. Denying the source does not change the facts.
https://katv.com/news/nation-world/...a-serrano-custody-baby-infant-birth-pregnancy
https://www.kktv.com/2023/03/02/col...his-baby-wont-face-jail-time-under-plea-deal/
https://gazette.com/news/courts/fou...cle_4a5819f0-ae24-11ed-8961-4bb59eac312b.html
Yup..Nifty admits he would be high fiving his 13 yo gay son if he has sex with a 13 yo man
A gay boy can enjoy sex with a 38 yo man just like a 13 yo boy can enjoy sex with a 38 yo woman
So in his fuck up world its not rape....plenty of people like him are grade school teachers
The American Heritage Dictionary says the same as I pointed out to APL in post #80. I think it's a travesty that the same word can mean forcing penetration on the one hand or the age differential being more than is lawfully allowed in a given jurisdiction on the other, but that's the state of affairs. Because of this cringeworthy ambiguity, it becomes crucially important to -differentiate- what kind of rape is meant in a given situation.
From what I've read of this particular case, it looks like the boy consented to having sex. That certainly doesn't change whether it was lawful given that he was below the age of consent in his jurisdiction, but from what I've read, it -does- change how he probably felt about it. He may still feel bad about doing it, but that's something that I haven't been able to determine from the article linked to in the opening post.
I'd like to point out that even if he felt good about doing it at the time, his feelings of the event may certainly have changed. Furthermore, I also acknowledge that in this case, more is clearly at stake due to the pregnancy.
But I'd also like to point out that the boy may love her. I pointed out a story that had some distinct similarities to this one in post #40. Unlike this story, that story has been playing out since 1996, with the older woman having died in 2020. Most importantly, we get to hear what the -boy- thought of the relationship he had with the woman, instead of just what other parties thought of it.
Last edited: