CNN: Judge rules Fanny stays on the case!

martin said:
Seating the jury isn't a preliminary. It can be one of the most important and tricky parts of a trial.
Click to expand...

Lots of lawyers have no idea how criminal cases work. Criminal work is a small subset of the law.
 
Hermes Thoth said:
I just really want perjury laws to be upheld.

especially for officers of the court.

the whole case is reversible if not.

is no other prosecutor all bribed up and ready to miscarry justice in a sleazy partisan and evil fashion?

i know that ain't true.

:truestory:
Click to expand...

You would have to prove perjury, and I do not see the evidence for it.
 
martin said:
Seating the jury isn't a preliminary. It can be one of the most important and tricky parts of a trial.
Click to expand...

My point on that, is that even adding new lead or co-lead lawyers at the beginning of the jury seating process, is not generally a too small increment of time to bring them and have sufficient time for them to get up to speed.

Therefore changing out Wade now, means the replacement lawyer likely still has at least 6 months and likely a year before this actual is tried.
 
QP! said:
My point on that, is that even adding new lead or co-lead lawyers at the beginning of the jury seating process, is not generally a too small increment of time to bring them and have sufficient time for them to get up to speed.

Therefore changing out Wade now, means the replacement lawyer likely still has at least 6 months and likely a year before this actual is tried.
Click to expand...

And we are at least months before jury selection.
 
martin said:
It's not the "getting up to date". It's getting a top banana to do the trial. They don't grow on trees and probably are up to their ears in present cases. I guess the major thing is civil trials move at a naturally slower pace. They don't have the same urgency, especially a case like this one.
Click to expand...

A lot of top lawyers would very happily clear their calendar to get into this case AND I am willing to bet the office itself has a staff prosecutor up to doing it by now.
 
QP! said:
I did not see anyone saying the judge was corrupt in that case. Most predicted it would go that way.
Click to expand...
so you're delusional. got it.

QP! said:
What i did see was many who thought it was BS that Rittenhouse was there to begin with, looking for the trouble that then found him. But i am sure some of the more crazy on the extreme left might have held that position.

When it comes to Magats, we are not talking about the extreme right anymore. It is the core of the right who claim every case they lose and every judge that rules against them, or every republican politician who does not side with them, is corrupt, a RINO, and so on.
Click to expand...
most of the left, right now, are calling the current SCOTUS nothing but a politically stacked bench.

again, the 'both sides' argument I present is totally fucking valid. to say anything other than it's true is delusional partisanship
 
volsrock said:
lead prosecutor KICKED OFF CASE


Does that always happen when they do nothing wrong?
Click to expand...

I don't dispute Fani shouldn't have boned her employee. What matters is the judge ruled it would have no bearing on the continuation of the case under Fani's leadership. If she needs another prosecutor, she'll hire one and the case against all the trumptards who tried to steal the election for trump in GA will go on.

Sorry, Charlie!
 
archives said:
Still don’t understand why the DA being caught fooling around, even considering some suspicious financial arrangements, had anything to do with the case of Trump being prosecuted for fraudulently trying to change the election in Georgia. How does any of this weigh against him receiving a fair trial? How does it even effect him or his trial?
Click to expand...

It doesn't. But that doesn't stop the trumptard cult from trying to use it to upend justice.
 
TOP said:
Professionally and personally "Fanny's" got no credibility left... this was a great decision on the judge's part... this is just getting good...
Click to expand...

The trumptards' slander of Fani's character will have no effect on the outcome of the trial. All that matters are the findings of the judge and jury.

Sorry to rain on your character assassination parade.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so you're delusional. got it.
Click to expand...
You spelled 'accurate' wrong there.


most of the left, right now, are calling the current SCOTUS nothing but a politically stacked bench.

again, the 'both sides' argument I present is totally fucking valid. to say anything other than it's true is delusional partisanship
Click to expand...

You are conflating different things here.

First the SC as tilted by Trump IS a political court and that has been admitted and not denied. The picks are now come solely off the Federalist Society picked lists, with all candidate pre qualified as Far right ideological driven judges. As Trump made clear, we absolutely KNOW how they will rule on certain issues, as that has been pre screened.

That came about as the Right, expressed great frustration how prior Right Republican justices were too intellectual and could be swayed to vote with the other side on key issues. The Right no longer wants these intellectual, big resume types, as candidates for the SC which is why they are filling the lower courts with Aileen Cannon and Matthew Kacsmaryk types who are young, dumb and complete ideologues who will ALWAYS vote the party, ideologue line and are immune to logic and truth and counter arguments.

Each and every new SC Justice the Federalist society will be more political, more ideological and younger.

But that does not mean all current Justices rule currently on ideological lines. Most were not selected this way, and this is mostly a new Magat thing.

So you are simply wrong on your point.
 
LurchAddams said:
The trumptards' slander of Fani's character will have no effect on the outcome of the trial. All that matters are the findings of the judge and jury.

Sorry to rain on your character assassination parade.
Click to expand...

yes but TOP like today's Magats can only live for the salacious slander as they are batting near 0 when it comes to actually prosecuting any crimes against Dems, so they have lowered the standard for what they must count as 'good' and a win.

meanwhile when Trump is found by a Jury and Judge in two separate instances to have raped a woman they cry it is meaningless as it is only a 'civil court finding and not a criminal court one' and they demand a higher standard to impune Trumps character as they think a civil court jury and separate Judge finding of RAPE is not enough.

And the next day they are back to 'it looks bad' as the sole reason to impugn Joe Biden and Fani and other Dems, with that being plenty enough for them.
 
archives said:
Still don’t understand why the DA being caught fooling around, even considering some suspicious financial arrangements, had anything to do with the case of Trump being prosecuted for fraudulently trying to change the election in Georgia. How does any of this weigh against him receiving a fair trial? How does it even effect him or his trial?
Click to expand...

it wasn't so much about her fooling around but the fact that she converted public funds to private use and lied about it......oh wait.....created the "appearance" of converting public funds to private use and lying about it......
 
domer76 said:
Well, Jethro, which fucking scenario do you think will happen? I’ll make it easy for you.

Wade is gone. They’ll hardly miss him because he wasn’t an active prosecutor anyway. He may or may not be replaced and the case moves forward with the same evidence.
Click to expand...
Wade has tendered his resignation as I knew he would.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top