CNN: Judge rules Fanny stays on the case!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
If you notice, I knew Rittenhouse was going to win. You just have to use logic instead of emotion.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
why did you know rittenhouse was going to win? and why did so many of your other leftist pals believe that the judge was a corrupt trumper?
I should correct what I said, there are some things that are not knowable, and usually a jury is not knowable. But I knew what the law was, and I watched the evidence and I had a pretty good idea. You would not have seen me out there, screaming about how Rittenhouse was going to be released. Just like I was almost certain that Willis would not be removed, Trump’s arguments about removing Willis were absolutely ludicrous, and not consistent with Georgia law.
Otherwise, what? The claim isn't silly if "it" is not obvious/ Before the pandemic I was a trial lawyer for almost 20 years, in civil cases. The biggest cases attract the best trial lawyers and you would learn that if a plaintiff's lead lawyer goes down when a case is verging on trial it would likely take time to replace him and be ready to go.
Good. Now a little advice, Fani: From now on please use good judgement and keep it in your pants. You know the trumptards are going to find any issue they can with you whether it has a bearing on your case or not. So don't give them any!
QP!
Verified User
I did not see anyone saying the judge was corrupt in that case. Most predicted it would go that way.
What i did see was many who thought it was BS that Rittenhouse was there to begin with, looking for the trouble that then found him. But i am sure some of the more crazy on the extreme left might have held that position.
When it comes to Magats, we are not talking about the extreme right anymore. It is the core of the right who claim every case they lose and every judge that rules against them, or every republican politician who does not side with them, is corrupt, a RINO, and so on.
State officials, who hold to the constitution, who go against a Trump request and refuse to break the law... are corrupt Rinos.
Judges who follow the law and rule against Trump... corrupt Rinos.
And so on and so on, even if Trump appointed them, and they voted for him.
The equivalency you are trying to create just does not exist.
For sure!
1) on the verge of trial, yes.
2) A prosecutor works differently than a civil trial lawyer, I know, I have done both jobs.
3) I have, and I have seen civil trial lawyers get themselves up-to-date on a case in a very few short days before.
4) The Georgia case against Donald Trump is nowhere near being on the verge of trial.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Well you sound like a lawyer but even if you’re not I’ll defer to you. I won’t even try to pretend to know what I’m talking in regards to legal stuff.
I’m just expressing my opinion based on limited knowledge. In any case I don’t really care what happens to Trump other than I’d like to see him die a natural death before the election.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
lol, that was me back then.
QP!
Verified User
I am surprised you were a 20 year lawyer and yet so unfamiliar on how criminal cases can and do often work. No offense intended.
A case like this could take 6 months to seat a jury, ...longer.
Again it is not uncommon for D.A's with budget concerns to use different priced lawyers for differing work. The SPECIALISTS, who are most expensive are the ones who argue big cases in court and they are often brought on as late as possible, because the D.A does not want to pay them to do the leg work. You will very OFTEN here (more common than not) of newly added BIG NAME lead lawyers to high profile cases, in the closing months or weeks just as they are about to go to court.
Wade has always had the appearance, and pay scale, of the case manager, or a associate lawyer (sorry Wade) on this case and Fani paid him, like he was that, as the very bottom of the pay scale for Georgia lawyers.
It's not the "getting up to date". It's getting a top banana to do the trial. They don't grow on trees and probably are up to their ears in present cases. I guess the major thing is civil trials move at a naturally slower pace. They don't have the same urgency, especially a case like this one.
QP!
Verified User
that is a very rare thing and good thing to acknowledge and something the magat's on this site could learn from you.
There is nothing wrong with having views on topics we are not all experts in but where most magats go wrong, is speaking as if what they say is fact, or proven, when it is not, and then refusing to defer to those who have information they do not.
Terry, Expresslane, TOP and so many more could learn from your example, should they care too.
My legal knowledge comes from never missing an episode of law and order!
/joke
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
QP!
Verified User
the biggest cases usually have no issues getting the biggest name lawyers, even last minute as they free up, as the publicity and history of arguing such cases, is of great value to many of them.
This one may prove problematic, as the former governor, top Prosecutor who turned Fani down, said, due to everyone knowing that the Prosecutor who gets a guilty verdict versus Trump, and the Judge and Jury (if they are outed), will all need 24/7 protection for them and their families for years due to the violent Magats who constitute today's party, under Trump.
We have Congress people who have admitted to other congress people they did not want to vote against Trump due to threats of violence, and that extends down the line to law enforcement, prosecutors and i am sure some Judges.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
I thought this was criminal.
