Climate deniers are sweating their @sses off

NASA cannot measure the temperature of the Earth, Sock.
NASA cannot just discard the 1st law of thermodynamics either. No gas or vapor has the capability of warming the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing.
https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/earth/

https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/earth/#/vitalsign?vitalsign=satellites&altid=0&animating=f&start=&end=
85tkmu.jpg

Mantra 68 Science-denying dumbass
Mantra 1a.
Mantra 4a.
One of the "miscellaneous" documents on that site is Into the Night's mantra list.
^^^
Fuckwit never heard of thermal-imaging sights, Infrared sights and other such equipment.
 
I feel the need to denigrate you because you have been a global warming denier for decades,
So why denigrate someone for not worshiping your particular religion, especially when your religion not only runs counter to science, but is as fucking stupid as you are? Why do you even worship a religion that targets the worlds stupidest people for indoctrination? One has to be incredibly stupid to simply buy into the the pure mind control that Climate Change is selling.

The point is that just because you are in the bottom 2% of humanity, intellectually speaking, you shouldn't assume that everyone else is ... except that your inherent stupidity would explain your bogus assumption.

... and now are so emotionally invested in your denialism that you would rather see harm come to your grandchildren's future than admit you were wrong on an obscure message board to people you don't know and will never meet.
 
You feel the need to denigrate him because you hate.

No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth, Sock. You can't create energy out of nothing. You are STILL ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.

Bulverism
Argument from ignorance fallacy


The Theory of the Big Bang is just a nonscientific theory
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
There is no such thing as an accelerating reference frame!!
There is no such thing as an 'accelerating frame of reference'.
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
Axioms are not postulates!
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
 
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, Sock. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are STILL ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.

Argument from ignorance fallacy


The Theory of the Big Bang is just a nonscientific theory
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
There is no such thing as an accelerating reference frame!!
There is no such thing as an 'accelerating frame of reference'.
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
Axioms are not postulates!
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
 
You are describing yourself again, Sock.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.


Bulverism
Argument from ignorance fallacy


The Theory of the Big Bang is just a nonscientific theory
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
There is no such thing as an accelerating reference frame!!
There is no such thing as an 'accelerating frame of reference'.
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
Axioms are not postulates!
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
 
So why denigrate someone for not worshiping your particular religion, especially when your religion not only runs counter to science, but is as fucking stupid as you are? Why do you even worship a religion that targets the worlds stupidest people for indoctrination? One has to be incredibly stupid to simply buy into the the pure mind control that Climate Change is selling.

The point is that just because you are in the bottom 2% of humanity, intellectually speaking, you shouldn't assume that everyone else is ... except that your inherent stupidity would explain your bogus assumption.

... and now are so emotionally invested in your denialism that you would rather see harm come to your grandchildren's future than admit you were wrong on an obscure message board to people you don't know and will never meet.

Bulverism 61

CLICK HERE To See Why IBDumbass Doesn't Post in Good Faith - He hounds me with what he imagines is a 'gotcha!' question, but when it blows up in his face he runs away from the thread like a little girl

hint: energy and matter are not interchangeable
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
Wave-Particle duality is classical physics.
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
There is no such thing as an accelerating reference frame!!
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
Darwin's theory of evolution is not science
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:
 
October was the hottest on record globally, 1.7 degrees Celsius (3.1 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than the pre-industrial average for the month
The reason that the Church of Global Warming recruits from humanity's stupidest is because extreme gullibility is needed for them to keep stringing along their congregation. Nobody has ever measured the earth's temperature to any usable accuracy, but the Climate flock is too flummoxed to ever ask any questions. Never does the Church even pretend to offer an otherwise obligatory margin of error, because the world's stupidest don't even know what that is, much less demand it. All that is required is an article saying something ridiculous and people like Terry and Cypress will "trust" it. Too funny.

So, while rational adults immediately realize that the article of the OP is simply standard mind control of a Marxist religion, the Global Warming congregation accepts it as inerrant gospel that should be taught in the science classroom.

How stupid must one be to fall for this crap?

8b220db0425d7609b775e0051fe66d00.jpg
 
Why can't satellites measure temperature?
Wrong question. A satellite can certainly (and extremely inaccurately) measure temperature. Who indicated that they could not?

Wait, did you mean to ask "Why can't satellites measure the entire earth's average global equilibrium temperature to within a usable margin of error?" ... but that you couldn't be bothered to write what you mean or to mean what you write?

Let me ask you, if you want to measure the average temperature of the water in a particular swimming pool, do you A. take a few measurements of the water at different points in the pool, both near the surface and near the bottom of the pool, at both ends of the pool and on both sides, and then apply statistical math to your measurements, or do you B. take one reading from roughly 800 miles away?

Let me know how you go about measuring the temperature of water in a swimming pool.
 
Back
Top