Christine O'Donnell walks out on CNN's Piers Morgan

[Cancel 2018. 3]

zappa is a retard who can't comprehend a simple word like indicate. he then has to dishonestly claim that i didn't mean indicate. like i said, for retards like him, i guess i need to repeat myself ad nauseum because little hacks like him will get all jumpy the minute you stop repeating yourself.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

This is what the Teatards defend.


The Prayer Witch Project has a habit of trying to ignore questions she can't answer - or whose answers would be embarrassing.


It's called a pattern of behavior.

Do her apologists fantasize about Witchy Woman snapping her fingers at them?

 

[zappasguitar]

wrong again. she said DURING the interview that this wasn't part of the agreed upon format or something like that.

zappa is a retard who can't comprehend a simple word like indicate. he then has to dishonestly claim that i didn't mean indicate. like i said, for retards like him, i guess i need to repeat myself ad nauseum because little hacks like him will get all jumpy the minute you stop repeating yourself.

You didn't use the word "indicate" in the top post...you stated she SAID there was an agreement...now you don't want to discuss that particular comment...why?

No waffling...no "indicating"...you claimed she SAID there was an agreement.

 

[Based Chad]

I think it is smart. The republicans have let these people take every debate and every interview off track into gay marriage. Instead of answering, telling people where their focus lies is a better way to go, especially when it isn't something you have a focus on.

wrong damo. She should be able to answer questions. Maybe the republcans should deal with their achilles heel of stupidity: homophobia-coddling.

 

[apple0154]

I bet that's the Republican strategy! Straight out of left Right field. A Palin/O'Donnell ticket.

Caption: "It is not enough to be abstinent with other people, you also have to be be abstinent alone. The Bible says that lust in your heart is committing adultery, so you can't masturbate without lust."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/...328.html#s140474&title=Masturbation__Adultery

As for Morgan’s line of questioning being “creepy” here’s O’Donnell’s own words, “"I dabbled into witchcraft. I never joined a coven." / "One of my first dates with a witch was on a satanic altar." - Politically Incorrect, 1999

Talking about masturbating on MTV and mentioning having made out on a satanic altar on a TV talk show is OK but when being interviewed about having written about masturbating in a book she is promoting it becomes “creepy”.

Thy name, Christine O’Donnell, is Hypocritical Wacko

Hypocritical: of the nature of hypocrisy, or pretense of having virtues, beliefs, principles, etc., that one does not actually possess.

That, my Republican friends, is Christine O'Donnell. A hypocritical wacko by any other name is still as hypocritical and as wacko.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

She's a idiot. The Teabaggers like 'em dumb, I guess.

 

[apple0154]

do you believe wealthy people didn't pay anything toward the roads?......perhaps even the largest share?........

I'm sure they do pay towards road costs and I'm sure they pay the largest share and that's because they have the most money.

The strangest thing about all this tax talk is the Conservative is generally against higher taxes for the wealthy; however, they are the promoter of family ideas/ideals. They tell us the family unit is the cornerstone of a good society. The ideals of working together and helping each other and all the other things families do to look after their members are things Conservatives and Liberals and most people, in general, believe to be the beneficial way to live but when it comes to expecting those who can afford to contribute more to society the Conservative talks about theft and Communism and how such an idea is poison.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

I wonder if what we're seeing might be an extreme form of resentment.


For decades, white working and middle class citizens have been taught by Republicans to equate all forms of social welfare with blacks and other racial minorities, with laziness, with communists, and with generally un-American or even anti-American principles.


Those who bought most into this, desperate to self-identify as distinct from minorities while somehow belonging with the ruling class, have become a foundation of the conservative movement.


Granted, they will never become part of the ruling class, but they can imagine that they might, and what's more they are encouraged to imagine themselves superior to a host of other groups: black, Latinos, immigrants, Arabs, Muslims, atheists, gays, etc.


They are given people to hate now and a dream of even greater power in the future; in exchange, they serve as foot soldiers for those who are in charge and for whose interests they will literally sacrifice their health, security, and even their lives.


Their caricature of government programs has never been consistent with reality — more poor whites receive welfare than poor blacks, for example — but direct government assistance has been distant enough from white working and middle class voters that they have been able to live in denial.


Government reform of health care and health insurance threatens to overturn this carefully constructed wall between social reality and the social resentments used to construct their self-image.




http://www.skepticism.org/propaganda-posters/tea-baggers-politics-of-resentment-self-destruction.html

 

[Onceler]

Did Carter talk about masturbation in the context of "adultery"? I didn't see that. That's what O'Donnell did, though.

Her comments were fair game, as are all of her views when she goes on a talk show. I hope every conservative does what Dixie advocates, and storms of shows that ask about these views. I can understand why they are embarassed about certain views, but if they don't want to talk about them, they shouldn't make them part of the political arena. Stop denouncing homosexuality; stop trying to push an "abstinence only" agenda, and opposing sex ed. Don't preach your morality on the campaign trail or in the context of public policy.

Or, face some tough questions, wilt & storm off. Your choice.

 

[apple0154]

i get it...it is bad when a pub does it, but good when a dem does it. you can set rules for one interview and not another.

Perhaps you should go back and view the two videos. Morgan asked O'Donnell a question and didn't feel the answer was complete and/or required more depth so he asked the question again. She said something about reading it in the book so he asked again.

When the Democrat was being interviewed the interviewer accepted the answer and moved on to other questions. Then, after getting answers to those other questions he started to refer to questions that had already been answered. As the interviewee said he wasn't there to discuss ideology, to get into a debate.

The interviewee made it clear the government shouldn't be allowed to steal from the people. Raising taxes is not stealing from the people. Stealing is the illegal taking of something. For example, if the Police take ones computer for evidence regarding a crime we do not say the Police stole the computer. They had a legal right to take it.

In the Democrat interview the interviewer was heading down the road attempting to equate taxes with theft. Again, it would be equivalent to a criminal saying the Police stole his computer even if the Police had a warrant. Neither has any relevance.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

I wonder if dodgeball was her favorite game as a kid. She sure hates to answer questions.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Perhaps you should go back and view the two videos. Morgan asked O'Donnell a question and didn't feel the answer was complete and/or required more depth so he asked the question again. She said something about reading it in the book so he asked again.

When the Democrat was being interviewed the interviewer accepted the answer and moved on to other questions. Then, after getting answers to those other questions he started to refer to questions that had already been answered. As the interviewee said he wasn't there to discuss ideology, to get into a debate.

The interviewee made it clear the government shouldn't be allowed to steal from the people. Raising taxes is not stealing from the people. Stealing is the illegal taking of something. For example, if the Police take ones computer for evidence regarding a crime we do not say the Police stole the computer. They had a legal right to take it.

In the Democrat interview the interviewer was heading down the road attempting to equate taxes with theft. Again, it would be equivalent to a criminal saying the Police stole his computer even if the Police had a warrant. Neither has any relevance.

I watched the videos and it is patently obvious that she is expected to go on that show, promote her book and get an easy time. She should have stuck to Fuxx News!!

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

It's not just that interview.


She has a habit of ducking questions, probably because when she appears in public she makes a huge fool of herself.


Watch, and laugh:

​

​

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

You didn't use the word "indicate" in the top post...you stated she SAID there was an agreement...now you don't want to discuss that particular comment...why?

No waffling...no "indicating"...you claimed she SAID there was an agreement.

like i said, whiny dishonest hacks like you need me to REPEAT ad nauseum the specific word "indicate"....you dishonestly refuse to acknowledge the other times i said it, thereby proving that it was i meant all along.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

This is hilarious:

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Did Carter talk about masturbation in the context of "adultery"? I didn't see that. That's what O'Donnell did, though.

Actually, as I pointed out, Carter's religious view took it one step further into 'wackoville' than O'Donnell. I think both views are based on the same scripture, but Carter contended in Playboy that it was 'adulterous' to lust for other women in your heart... that doesn't even involve masturbation... just the act of THINKING about another woman in that context, is a sin. But we don't hear relentless obsessive posts going on and on and on and on... about Carter's wacko religious views. Nope, we won't hear a goddamn word about Carter, because he is a Liberal, and they can have whatever wacky views they please, that's fine... they are LIBERALS!

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Actually, as I pointed out, Carter's religious view took it one step further into 'wackoville' than O'Donnell. I think both views are based on the same scripture, but Carter contended in Playboy that it was 'adulterous' to lust for other women in your heart... that doesn't even involve masturbation... just the act of THINKING about another woman in that context, is a sin. But we don't hear relentless obsessive posts going on and on and on and on... about Carter's wacko religious views. Nope, we won't hear a goddamn word about Carter, because he is a Liberal, and they can have whatever wacky views they please, that's fine... they are LIBERALS!

Who said it was "fine" for Jimmeh to be an idiot, Dixtard?


He was lambasted then for his wacko views, just as the Prayer Witch Project is a laughingstock now.


You seem to be slacking off on the caps, exclamation points, and references to "pinheads". Are you feeling OK?

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

I'm sure they do pay towards road costs and I'm sure they pay the largest share and that's because they have the most money.

The strangest thing about all this tax talk is the Conservative is generally against higher taxes for the wealthy; however, they are the promoter of family ideas/ideals. They tell us the family unit is the cornerstone of a good society. The ideals of working together and helping each other and all the other things families do to look after their members are things Conservatives and Liberals and most people, in general, believe to be the beneficial way to live but when it comes to expecting those who can afford to contribute more to society the Conservative talks about theft and Communism and how such an idea is poison.

Let's be clear, the wealthy pay ALL the cost because 49% of the country doesn't pay ANY tax. I totally REJECT your idiot notion that 'wealthy' people should pay more because they make more. Where else does this transpire in society? If you go to a restaurant, does the owner size you up when you leave, and base your bill on how "well off" he thinks you are? If you don't look like you have much money, you get your meal for free... and if you look like you're doing well, you get to pay more to make up for those who haven't paid. No, in a restaurant, we all pay the price on the menu, and it doesn't matter if we are wealthy or poor, we're expected to pay the price listed on the menu. Now you pinheads seem to comprehend that as fair, I don't see you out there advocating we change the laws and force restaurants to adopt a regressive pricing scheme... but for some reason, common sense departs your empty skulls when it comes to taxes. It's the SAME THING!

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Last Wednesday, former Delaware Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell objected to a line of questioning and walked out of an interview on CNN's "Piers Morgan Tonight," where she was a guest to promote her nonfiction book "Troublemaker."


If O'Donnell intended to use the kerfuffle to boost sales of her book, apparently it didn't work.


In the early hours following her walk out, O'Donnell's new book from St. Martin's press -- "Troublemaker: Let's Do What It Takes to Make America Great Again" -- was ranked 2,228 on Amazon's bestseller list.


Since then, however, sales have slowed.


But it did have a positive effect on Morgan's numbers the following day.


The 9 p.m. Eastern talk show led CNN's lineup on Thursday, both in total viewers and in the advertiser-approved target adults 25-54 demographic.


"Piers Morgan Tonight" drew 809,000 total viewers and 241,000 in the demo.




http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/was...t-loses-christine-odonnell-finds-viewers.html

:lol:​

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Let's be clear, the wealthy pay ALL the cost because 49% of the country doesn't pay ANY tax. I totally REJECT your idiot notion that 'wealthy' people should pay more because they make more. Where else does this transpire in society? If you go to a restaurant, does the owner size you up when you leave, and base your bill on how "well off" he thinks you are? If you don't look like you have much money, you get your meal for free... and if you look like you're doing well, you get to pay more to make up for those who haven't paid. No, in a restaurant, we all pay the price on the menu, and it doesn't matter if we are wealthy or poor, we're expected to pay the price listed on the menu. Now you pinheads seem to comprehend that as fair, I don't see you out there advocating we change the laws and force restaurants to adopt a regressive pricing scheme... but for some reason, common sense departs your empty skulls when it comes to taxes. It's the SAME THING!

Except that in the restaraunt of American society, the rich increasingly claim they left their wallet at home, or say they found a fly in the salad.


BTW, good job on the caps and the use of "pinheads", but more exclamation points would be cool. Just sayin'.