Christine O'Donnell walks out on CNN's Piers Morgan

[Doctor Flower Power]

The Dancin' Dalai LOL

 

[zappasguitar]

Why does the Dancin' Dalai think anyone wants to interview him? True, his opinions are just as wack, but, let's face it: he's not running for anything either, hasn't written a book, and is nowhere near as funny as the Prayer Witch Project.



Now, let's compare the Boltin' Bimbo's two versions of why she turned into a Runaway Cried:


Version 1: My flee-bagging had nothing to do with Piers Morgan, I was late for another engagment.

"We had already gone over our time limit and were late for a Women's National Republican Club speech being shown on C-SPAN. No hard feelings and I wish Piers all the best in his future endeavors."

http://www2.wsls.com/entertainment/2011/aug/18/odonnell-no-hard-feelings-for-cnns-morgan-ar-1247468/




Version 2: Piers Morgan was "creepy" and sexually harrassed me.


"When they're sitting there pressing you on personal intimate questions and you're saying, 'I don't want to go there,' he could have said, 'What's your mother's name?' and I would have been like, 'Come on, let's stop!' I wanted to stop that borderline sexual harassment that was going on. It was inappropriate and he wasn't stopping."

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nat...l-piers-morgan-was-sexually-harassing-me.html


Jump in and dance some more, Damo.

I wonder which time she was lying?

And will Damo and Yurt stop carrying water for her and admit she's a liar?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

This audio is hilarious - don't worry, she hangs up pretty quickly, so it's not a long listen:


http://soundcloud.com/magallanes90/kxrk-x96-rfh-christine

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

I wonder which time she was lying?

And will Damo and Yurt stop carrying water for her and admit she's a liar?

what are you babbling about now?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Riiiiiiiight...she said she had an agreement "or something like that"...LOL!

Did I say reporters NEVER agree to refrain from asking certain questions?

I simply said that a reporter MAY ask any question they like during an interview...that said...if the interviewer does so repeatedly with numerous guests, he/she would likely get the reputation of being untrustworthy and it might make it difficult to book future guests...it also could give the interviewer the reputation of being unafraid to ask "the tough questions" and make him/her a hero.

Journalism students learn in their first year that even though the phrase is used all the time, there's no such thing as "off the record"...if the interviewee wants something kept "off the record" then they should keep their mouth shut.

you have proof there was no agreement? you seem absolutely certain.

 

[zappasguitar]

wrong again. she said DURING the interview that this wasn't part of the agreed upon format or something like that.

you have proof there was no agreement? you seem absolutely certain.

You are the one making the claim she had an agreement...hows about YOU go find the proof.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

No 'sexual harrasment' here, she just can't handle being challenged.


From the Flee-bagger's radio interview:


The Prayer Witch Project: "...to hopefully give the reader the confidence to trust their own gut, so they too can make some trouble in their own arena".


Host: "I guess, though, that you would have to say the voters of Delaware trusted their guts, and thought that you were crazy".


She hung up shortly after this exchange, and later blamed it on "satellites".


http://soundcloud.com/magallanes90/kxrk-x96-rfh-christine

:lol:​

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

You are the one making the claim she had an agreement...hows about YOU go find the proof.

wrong again. i said she seemed to INDICATE there was an agreement and i offered my reasons why. i never said there absolutely was an agreement. you on the other hand hate her so you state as fact there is no agreement. you have nothing to substantiate such a statement, except - i hate her, i distrust her.

if you watch the interview, she makes comments that indicate they turned down another interview for this interview and the questions he was asking were not appropriate....as i said, this INDICATES there was an agreement. now, other than your usual hatred, do you have anything to suggest there was no agreement? if not, then stop running around pretending your OPINION is a fact.

 

[Jarod]

So, Damo, what was the answer to the question?

 

[zappasguitar]

she said DURING the interview that this wasn't part of the agreed upon format or something like that.

There's you stating that she did indeed say there was some agreement.

wrong again. i said she seemed to INDICATE there was an agreement and i offered my reasons why. i never said there absolutely was an agreement. .

Whoops...now you want to deny what you said earlier...why is that?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

There's you stating that she did indeed say there was some agreement. Whoops...now you want to deny what you said earlier...why is that?

Because he is what he talks about incessantly. A trollish hack.

i watched it on tv and she indicated this was the case, that is why she walked out. watch the video

wrong again. she said DURING the interview that this wasn't part of the agreed upon format or something like that. you're completely ignorant if you believe reporters/news stations never agree to certain questions or agree that some questions are off topic. it happens all the time. politicians have told reporters before that certain subjects were off topic. i remember tiger woods agreed to be interviewed by numerous press on the condition they wouldn't bring up the affairs. you've proven once again how little you know. i'm also not surprised you aren't calling out the dem who walked out. you're like that, it is only bad when someone you don't agree with does it.

while i agree it was dumb on her part because it makes her look weak, if they did have an agreed upon interview process and he broke it, i see no real problem and this wouldn't be the first time it has happened. she indicated that there was an agreement and that she went with piers instead of another interview for that reason.

The Dancin' Dalai has a partner in the desperate deflection dance. His name is Yurt.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

while i agree it was dumb on her part because it makes her look weak, if they did have an agreed upon interview process and he broke it, i see no real problem and this wouldn't be the first time it has happened. she indicated that there was an agreement and that she went with piers instead of another interview for that reason.

i watched it on tv and she indicated this was the case, that is why she walked out. watch the video

There's you stating that she did indeed say there was some agreement.




Whoops...now you want to deny what you said earlier...why is that?

i guess next time i will keep repeating myself for the dumb dishonest hacks out there...because oh boy, if i don't....then of course i never said it before

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

i guess next time i will keep repeating myself for the dumb dishonest hacks out there...because oh boy, if i don't....then of course i never said it before

​

 

[Onceler]

She tried it, several times during the interview including working a redirect. The guy was focused solely on sex and would not move... I can see why she left. If she were running for an office I am sure it would matter, it might even harm her chances to be elected, but she isn't. He had no interest in speaking about her book, only about sex and made it very clear.

I just saw the interview. He was focused because he couldn't figure out why she was dodging it. She kept saying "my position on that is in the book." Then, she'd say she was there to discuss the book...so why the embarassment over what she states in it? Most good interviewers would do pretty much what Piers did. He wasn't rude about it. He was just confused as to why she wouldn't address something in the book, in an interview to discuss the book.

 

[apple0154]

(Posted by Damocles) Quoting what the bible says is "wacko", gotcha.

Yes, parts of it are whacko, in my opinion.

Exactly! If I recall correctly the Bible mentions selling people into slavery and killing ones neighbor if they're caught working on the Sabbath. If anyone wrote about that in a book I'm sure the interviewer would press for a full explanation rather than dwell on vouchers for Medicare/Medicaid or raising the age for Social Security by a year or two.

The woman is a wacko and it's vital for the audience to understand the author before evaluating her ideas. I'm sure rapists and murderers have some good ideas regarding fiscal prudence but they sure as hell wouldn't get interviewed on TV.

 

[apple0154]

Democrat Walks Away From Interview After Being Asked About Wealth Redistribution

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/de...fter-being-asked-about-wealth-redistribution/

I watched the video. Not only did he answer the question but he elaborated on his answer explaining the wealthy use the roads and rails which were paid for by others. Furthermore, they have more to protect which the military does and everyone pays.

The interviewer repeated the same question after having asked other questions. If the interviewer didn't feel the interviewee answered the question earlier he should have immediately asked it again. Obviously, the interviewer does not know the difference between an interview and a debate.

 

[apple0154]

Didn't Jimmy Carter get that from the bible though?

"Yea as you mow your lawn do not lust after your neighbor's wife's ass or i shall surely smite thee in the peen"

I'm pretty sure. I'm no expert though.

You're right. Once one accidentally mows over the flower bed because they kept pushing the mower while looking over the fence they quickly learn not to covet "thy neighbor's wife, nor his/her ass," etc. (Exodus. 20:17)

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

If you watch the interview he was not suggesting that it advice to others, it was his own personal position. (Still wacko to me) THat is a lot better than trying to push that onto others.

First of all it was a written interview in Playboy Magazine, you couldn't "watch" it, you could only READ it. Yes, it was his personal view, just as O'Donnell holds her personal view. Did O'Donnell EVER propose we pass a law making masturbation adultery? You're just a two-faced hypocritical liberal ass. You want to apply one standard to O'Donnell, and quite a different standard to Carter, but what they said was equally as "wacko" and part of their personal religious viewpoint. In fact, Carter's view is actually MORE extreme than O'Donnell's. Yet, you guys still let Carter sit on the front row with VIPs like Micheal Moore at the DNC.

We've not even gotten into some of the 'wacko' beliefs of Obama and his Black Liberation Theology pastor, Rev. Wright. Now there is some wacko shit they really DO want to make law of the land and force on everyone to accept. Oh, but that's okay because Obama is a LIBERAL "Christian" ....right?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Poor Dixtard.


Now he's resorted to "they do it too".

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

I watched the video. Not only did he answer the question but he elaborated on his answer explaining the wealthy use the roads and rails which were paid for by others. Furthermore, they have more to protect which the military does and everyone pays.

The interviewer repeated the same question after having asked other questions. If the interviewer didn't feel the interviewee answered the question earlier he should have immediately asked it again. Obviously, the interviewer does not know the difference between an interview and a debate.

really not surprised you defend the liberal and bash the conservative for doing the same thing