Christine O'Donnell walks out on CNN's Piers Morgan

Jarod said:
1) I suspect had she answered the questions asked he would have discussed other topics.
2) She admits there are chapters in her book about these sexual topics.
Click to expand...

1. I don't believe he would.
2. However, she also notes that the book states that "if" these things were to be discussed as policy it should be local policy.

She answered the questions, he just didn't want to change focus. I don't believe he had any other subject prepared for the interview.
 
1) I have seen other interviews where he moved on once the question was answered.
2) She did not answer the question about if she still held those same belifes. You can pretned she did, but she did not.
 
Jarod said:
1) I have seen other interviews where he moved on once the question was answered.
2) She did not answer the question about if she still held those same belifes. You can pretned she did, but she did not.
Click to expand...

1.) I have seen other interviews where he has not.
2.) She answered it, but not satisfactorily for him, then the next question was again about sex, just a different kind. I don't think he prepared anything other than that focus.

Basically, she said she wasn't going there, let's talk about the actual theme of the book...

I'll be interested in seeing interviews with others.
 
Let's review:



  • The attention whore lost an election and holds wacko viewpoints. Perhaps the voters rejected her wacko viewpoints.



  • To get money, she wrote a book containing those wacko viewpoints.



  • Because she holds wacko viewpoints, she is mildly interesting. So to publicize her book, she accepted an invitation to be interviewed on a major news outlet about said book, and then walked out because she won't answer questions about the wacko viewpoints she describes in her book.



  • She keeps saying "it's in the book"....in other words, buy my book, I won't tell you what's in it.


LOL.
 
Damocles said:
In that post I was speaking of interviews in general, not specifically this one. You can tell that it was an extension of my first post which was a more general statement about interviews with republicans and how they consistently lose message when they let interviewers focus on that issue.
Click to expand...

Nice dance step.

How many of these evil ambush interviews have derailed hapless Teabaggers into off-topic discussions of gay marriage? Gimme a number.

The witless witch was running for "book sales".

She sucked as a candidate, as we both know.

She also sucks as a writer, based on what I've read so far.

I wonder if she used a ghost and wouldn't answer the question because she hasn't read "her own" book.

Her wacko beliefs are the only thing that make her even mildly interesting, so, yeah, that pretty much was the only topic worth pursuing.

Looked to me like he wouldn't let her off the hook when she tried to dodge a question. Name a journalist that would.

I wonder if he would've asked her about her lesbian sister next if she'd been honest about her stand on gays.

I'm sure the dancin' Dalai Damocles would have fully supported a liberal writer walking out on an interview if someone asked about a topic in their book, right?

How much of her book have you read, faux Buddhist?

Now, dance some more.




Emi0l.gif
 
Failin' Palin the Grifter Grandma is passe.


Bach-to-Mom the Corndogger is the new Teabagger standard bearer.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
If she wants to do an interview where the topic being discussed and the questions being asked are decided upon beforehand, then she needs to schedule some time with Faux News...

it's no wonder so many Righties are all butthurt and afraid to do any interviews with anyone besides Faux News...they can't count on easy to answer softball questions from anyone but Faux.
Click to expand...

where's Jeff Gannon when you need him?
 
Zeus: King of the Gods said:
Tea Party favorite Christine O'Donnell walked out of an interview with CNN last night after Piers Morgan asked the former Delaware Senate candidate her views about gay marriage.

http://content.usatoday.com/communi...istine-odonnell-walks-off-cnn-piers-morgan-/1


What a real loser. :palm:
Click to expand...

while i agree it was dumb on her part because it makes her look weak, if they did have an agreed upon interview process and he broke it, i see no real problem and this wouldn't be the first time it has happened. she indicated that there was an agreement and that she went with piers instead of another interview for that reason.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
If she wants to do an interview where the topic being discussed and the questions being asked are decided upon beforehand, then she needs to schedule some time with Faux News...

it's no wonder so many Righties are all butthurt and afraid to do any interviews with anyone besides Faux News...they can't count on easy to answer softball questions from anyone but Faux.
Click to expand...

is it your claim that only fox news agrees to specific points to discuss in an interview before hand?
 
Yurt said:
is it your claim that only fox news agrees to specific points to discuss in an interview before hand?
Click to expand...

Of course he doesn't claim that... He just thinks that only Fox would abide by their agreement. He's a closet admirer of Fox News. :D
 
LOL, now the apologists for the Flee-bagger are insinuating that there was an "agreement" not to ask Witchy Woman about gay issues.


Where's the evidence for such a supposition?
 
Damocles, If she answered the question I am sure you can tell me.... Does she still subscribe to the same belifes as she did when the older video was taken?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top