I'll stop you there, again this is FALSE! The resources have NEVER belonged to everyone.
Yes they did! There was so much resources, therefore no one felt the desire to hoard wealth, until the resources started to become scarce!
Basically everyone had access to the land and its fruits.
Again, I will stop you to point out the idiocy of your own flawed premise, if the resources belonged to everyone and this was universally understood, why would they fight wars or have conflicts? I understand there was demand, but the resources are plentiful, the planet still has resources to this day and people still mine them regularly, there is no shortage now, there certainly wasn't a shortage then, so why did they have conflicts and fight, why didn't they just share the resources that everyone understood were universally owned by all? Let me help you out here... because there never was a time where people understood all resources belong to everyone, that is a fucked up socialist fantasy you believe in, and it has no basis in reality.
Are you paying attention??Simply because as the groups grew larger so did their demand for resources(Including land). They were not plentiful. Especially land. The western Hemisphere had not even been discovered. Even the Vikings of the North started to expand south. Maybe they are the root of the problem. There wasn't too many resources in the winter northern regions.
If there are no shortages, why do they keep increasing the prices of commodities? Do you admit the capitalists are manipulating supply?
You lack insight.
Hold up a sec... you have completely skipped over the part where we went from "resources belong to everyone" to kings realizing value... how could there be any value to something that everyone owns and is entitled to? Again.... there never was a time when resources belonged to everyone. They belong to who possess them, who has access to them, who owns the property they are on... that's not 'everybody'.
OK. The resources belonged to everyone(within the tribe country/nation). Then as tribes expanded they would eventually come into contact with the borders of other expanding tribes. Result? WARS(especially when there was no communication) Because of this threat from rival tribes? The King/chief/leader would build combat troops(basically soldiers).
Remember. All the resources within that kingdom, belonged to all. Not only the Monarch. Eventually wars demanded more and more resources. The people were forced to work more and more.The king started to not only use his soldiers to go to war with other tribes but to dominate his own people. They became slaves to the Monarch's ambitions to conquer other lands. They got payed less and less for extracting the resources. And more and more of the wealth went into the pockets of the Monarchs.
No, the resources were owned by monarchs, kings, etc. They did not "become" owned.
After they became greedy and used their military to suppress their own people and hoard all the wealth(Resources).
Not sure how things work in England, we don't have a Queen here in the US. Resources belong to the property owner, and they can sell rights to mine the resources.
You have a monarchy(more of an Oligarch) and they originate from Britain but its not the Queen. It is your creditors which are in fact European bankers. They own and run America.
I'm not sure how it works in the US, though regardless. No one should have the right to the resources under the land. That is my entire point. They are making unlawful gain. Just a way for the rich who own all the money and thus can buy all the land. To be get richer.
Well, in America, the voters who elected the people into government who made the rules.... that's who gave them the right. But I can't help notice, have we completely abandoned the notion that all resources belong to everyone? You said monarchs fell and the rights to the resources was lost... that seems to indicate the resources didn't belong to everyone, as you originally stated.
Really? The people gave the government the right to sell resources to private owners so they can be sold back to them at 10X the cost? I don't think Americans gave the gov that right.
Monarchs began to hoard the resources(the wealth). When the Monarchs fell the resources should have been put back into possession of the citizens of that country.
Unless you owned the land, you didn't own the resources. Therefore, there is no thievery. Wealth does not depend upon your recognition of it... sorry... must be another fucked up fantasy you are having. People owned land with resources, and they sold the rights to the resources for $X per ton or whatever royalty amount was arranged, and they capitalized on owning the land and resources and made a profit. Someone else bought the resource rights, invested in the mining, which cost money, and then re-sold the mined resources for a profit. Someone else bought the mined resources, turned them into another product(s)... resold those, and made a profit... etc, etc, etc. It's called CAPITALISM!
You know whats funny? Jesus said(I know your Christian):
Matthew 6:25-26
New American Standard Bible (NASB)
25 “For this reason I say to you, do not be worried about your life, as to what you will eat or what you will drink; nor for your body, as to what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? 26 Look at the birds of the air, that they do not sow, nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not worth much more than they?
I guess Jesus wasn't familiar with HOARDING OF THE RESOURCES!! If the Stronger birds started hoarding the food sources, they rest would starve too!