Capitalism Increases The Cost Of Housing Faster Than The Wages Rise.

I am the only one here who argues for sustainable living and fully embrace that will have huge economic consequences. You are the one who is upset that Brexit may raise the price of your wine at Sainsbury's. The only incredible footle is happening on the other side of the swimming pool from me.


You're obviously very full of cheap wine already. What the buggery are you talking about?
 
More with your unfounded assumptions. Recognizing that past performed labor has no future market value is not a preference. It is simply reality.

Commodities are worthless except when just produced, eh? Go buy the White House for a dime, brilliance! :)
 
Commodities are worthless except when just produced, eh? Go buy the White House for a dime, brilliance! :)

The white house is a tangible good with a marketable value. The labor of the slaves who built it didn't even have value back in the day.
 
"Thou shalt not covet*thy neighbor's house"

Lefties cannot help having their eyes on everybody else's shit. They covet their neighbor's house and paycheck, and they dream of taking over other people's businesses and companies. They have their eyes on the wealth of the top 1%, and if they ever get it, they will be after the next 1% too. Socialists, commies, and lefties are really all the same thing, and they will be after other people's shit until nobody has anything left to take. Lefties/commies are parasites.

Ad hom talking points because you can't address the issues.
 
Hello 10DayUserName,



All the most desirable land (often waterfront) has been highly developed through the efforts of those who can never afford to enjoy it, for the benefit of those who never had to physically work for it. The surrounding land then escalates in value to further squeeze the working man out. But the elites need to be serviced, so this forces the service workers to commute longer and longer distances. This causes a huge amount of emissions and climate change. The climate change is in the process of causing sea level rise which will render waterfront property submerged.

This doesn't seem like a very smart long range plan.

All the most desirable land (often waterfront) has been highly developed through the efforts of those who can never afford to enjoy it, for the benefit of those who never had to physically work for it.

First of all, nobody forced those people to develop the land. They took the job and got paid through their own freedom of choice.
And your comment bolded/red above just shows your disdain for the wealthy. You claim to have no disdain for the wealthy yet you call them "Wealthaholics", "Greedy", "Super-rich" and say "They value money over everything else in life". And how can you claim that they "never had to physically work for it"? If they didn't have to work for it, how could they afford to buy the land? Your disdain for the wealthy is on full display and it's disingenuous for you to say you don't have any.
It's painfully apparent.
 
As are most politicians. He just doesn't try to pretend otherwise.

Other politicians may be suspected by their opponents of being less than morally solvent: Trumpf is the most open scoundrel since some of the very worst Roman emperors, surely?
 
Other politicians may be suspected by their opponents of being less than morally solvent: Trumpf is the most open scoundrel since some of the very worst Roman emperors, surely?

Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein are both very wealthy women to be career public servants. The party that wants to save species is the same party that wants to plow new highways through their habitat because "infrastructure" sounds so clean. The party that wants to spend more on education is the same party that is causing school systems to hemorrhage money because a tranny lawsuits and such. The party that wants more "renewable energy" ignore that energy often comes from burning trees and garbage, both of which degrade air quality. Cognitive dissonance isn't peculiar to Trump or the GOP.
 
This is part of how wealth is extracted from the many by the few.

No, it's not.

You're not an economist and you make way too many false assumptions in your main post.

I don't know what your motive is to post these false, misleading posts but I doubt many will buy into it.
 
Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein are both very wealthy women to be career public servants. The party that wants to save species is the same party that wants to plow new highways through their habitat because "infrastructure" sounds so clean. The party that wants to spend more on education is the same party that is causing school systems to hemorrhage money because a tranny lawsuits and such. The party that wants more "renewable energy" ignore that energy often comes from burning trees and garbage, both of which degrade air quality. Cognitive dissonance isn't peculiar to Trump or the GOP.

It seems obvious that Mr Trump tells enormous lies all the time, demonstrable on recording and film, which he says record events that didn't happen. Do you deny that? If so, we are receiving a different lot of capitalist propaganda here. For all I know, there may be something in what you say about the opposition, but it is very minor (from here anyway) compared with open and obvious lying, which tends to baffle the world about what has happened to American democracy.
 
Last edited:
Hello 10DayUserName,

As are most politicians. [morally bankrupt]

This is why we need far better education and we need to teach the young about this so they will do their research and only vote for the good ones. We do not have to accept mediocrity.

He just doesn't try to pretend otherwise.

Voting for somebody like that is the same as giving up on a good future. It is not a good plan.
 
It seems obvious that Mr Trump tells enormous lies all the time, demonstrable on recordings film, which he says record events that didn't happen. Do you deny that? If so, we are receiving a different lot of capitalist propaganda here. For all I know, there may be something in what you say about the opposition, but it is very minor (from here anyway) compared with open and obvious lying, which tends to baffle the world about what has happened to American democracy.

He came from the world of business. That is no secret. There is no upside in business letting the other side know everything. Politics is not that much different in this regard. I don't pay that much attention to the minutia of Trump. Presidents come and go; control switches back and forth between one wall street party or the other. American democracy is fine, though I find your position a bit perplexing considering your complaints about Russian influence, fraud, etc in the Brexit vote, your parliament demanding there be no no-deal brexit but refusing to get on board any deal, etc etc etc. We both have our Shakespearian dramas going on. In the end, it is just all theatrics.
 
Hello 10DayUserName,

Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein are both very wealthy women to be career public servants. The party that wants to save species is the same party that wants to plow new highways through their habitat because "infrastructure" sounds so clean. The party that wants to spend more on education is the same party that is causing school systems to hemorrhage money because a tranny lawsuits and such.

We have a choice. We can pay for education or we can pay for prisons. Education is cheaper. Clearly improved public education is the best choice.

The party that wants more "renewable energy" ignore that energy often comes from burning trees and garbage, both of which degrade air quality. Cognitive dissonance isn't peculiar to Trump or the GOP.

Now you're just stereotyping.
 
Hello 10DayUserName,



This is why we need far better education and we need to teach the young about this so they will do their research and only vote for the good ones. We do not have to accept mediocrity.



Voting for somebody like that is the same as giving up on a good future. It is not a good plan.

Sounds too much like indoctrination to me. People need to decide for themselves what and who they value, not be brainwashed into a pre-conceived set of mores.
 
Hello 10DayUserName,

He came from the world of business. That is no secret. There is no upside in business letting the other side know everything. Politics is not that much different in this regard. I don't pay that much attention to the minutia of Trump. Presidents come and go; control switches back and forth between one wall street party or the other. American democracy is fine, though I find your position a bit perplexing considering your complaints about Russian influence, fraud, etc in the Brexit vote, your parliament demanding there be no no-deal brexit but refusing to get on board any deal, etc etc etc. We both have our Shakespearian dramas going on. In the end, it is just all theatrics.

I'll have the enhanced education system with a side of accountability; and hold the apathy, please. It doesn't digest well.
 
They can enter the oldest profession for all I care. It is their problem, not mine, to sort. They certainly never seem to be out of money for alcohol, cigarettes, tattoos and such.

sociopaths like you are handicapped

your brain is misswired


its why you hate everyone who is NOT YOU

your brain is crippled


damaged


let us unbroken brained people fix things


with your handicapped brain you are incapable of fixing things
 
Back
Top