Can we all agree this is disgusting?

ib1yysguy said:
Proof positive that you know nothing at all.

Autism is of course a spectrum disorder and kids with pronounced autism often times can't even speak.
Click to expand...

I am aware of that. As I stated, there are genuine cases of autism. But there are also many fake cases. Do you deny this? Rather than hurl insults like a sniveling child, why not answer my question. It's pretty simple.

So if you don't see a difference it's because you're a moron or her sisters is moot OR the kid is only marginally autistic.
Click to expand...

What I see is a child who is never disciplined and gets whatever she wants.

Who diagnosed it, by the way? A "left-wing" psychologist?
Click to expand...

As a matter of fact, yes! I've done some work for this particular psychologist, and he is as left-wing as they come.

Jesus. Take a stiff drink of gasoline and do us all a favor.
Click to expand...

So anyone who disagrees with you should just die? How "tolerant" of you.

Thorn said:
We should also add that psychologists can't prescribe medications. They're not MDs.
Click to expand...

Point taken.
 
Yes, asswhipe, I deny it. The number of "fake" cases is inconsequential. Doctors who diagnose these kids know what they're doing, as to the MANY specialists who work with these kids to determine if they need services from nonprofits or the school system.

And the idea that the one psychologist you know is left wing makes all psychologists left wing is dumb beyond words. *facepalm*

And I don't claim to be tolerant of conservatives. You really should die a terrible death in some fire or other. You deserve it.
 
Tabasco said:
I think we should all think before we speak because if we don't, those words can come back and bite us.

Remember Nadya Suleman’s statements about raising her children – all 14 of them on her own? How she wasn’t, and never would, take money from welfare? How about when she said she wasn’t ever going to take a single penny from any tax payers’ pocket? Well apparently she has forgotten all about them.

Even though she has stated she “doesn't consider the public assistance she receives to be welfare” the rest of the Country does! First off, she is getting $490 a month in food stamps: a number which will increase substantially with the new 8 children.

Then there is the money she collects on behalf of three of her children. Suleman told NBC that she receives the payments because one of her kids is autistic, another has ADHD and a third experienced a mild speech delay with "tiny characteristics of autism." She refused to say how much they get but Social Security payments in California can be up to $793 a month PER each child – if that were the case, she would be getting $2,379 per month!

Then we add in her disability payments which according to the LA Times, started as temporary but could be reassigned as permanent. The Times also reported she filed a second claim after she was in a car accident stating she would not have been hit had she not been seeking treatment from the first problem! There was no report on if she was able to cash in on that attempt.This is all for a young woman who stated to a judge she was so bad off she could barely get out of bed or care for her then ONE child! Of course on the NBC interview she leaned down and swooped up one of her older toddlers without hesitation and without a grimace or reaction. She seems pretty capable to me!

Click Here

This is all the proof I need that we are living in a sick, insane country.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't this woman be the poster child for conservative love of "life?"

She's had 14 children, no abortions?

If you're so-called "pro-life", why are you concerned about how much her children cost?

This points out the absolute and total ignorance of the "pro-life" position.
 
What I can agree on is some of you people on the right are sick and disgusting.

Autism is fake .. thanks for the ignorance Dr. Limbaugh.
 
Watermark said:
I really have no words for you Tabasco. It makes me want to puke that I share the same genome with an animal like you. You are a disgusting subhuman wretch who deserves nothing but a bullet shot in the back of the head.
Click to expand...

Some people could consider this a threat of physical violence. Is that allowed on this forum?
 
AssHatZombie said:
Some people could consider this a threat of physical violence. Is that allowed on this forum?
Click to expand...

The only people who would consider this a threat of physical violence are people who have not read any of WM's posts.

Is it high quality debating? Hardly
Is it an actual threat? lmao please
 
Solitary said:
The only people who would consider this a threat of physical violence are people who have not read any of WM's posts.

Is it high quality debating? Hardly
Is it an actual threat? lmao please
Click to expand...

But it's much wiser to avoid even the appearance of a threat. We got WM's point clearly without even the appearance of a threat.

There are norms that should be adhered to even in cyberspace.

.. just my opinion.
 
blackascoal said:
But it's much wiser to avoid even the appearance of a threat. We got WM's point clearly without even the appearance of a threat.

There are norms that should be adhered to even in cyberspace.

.. just my opinion.
Click to expand...

And you are correct. WM's remarks are over the line. But its also WM we are talking about here. If this were the first time he suggested that conservatives should be killed, I might worry more.

Mainly I was addressing asshat's attempt to get an admin involved.
 
I think it is quite obvious that WM would never shoot anyone in the back of the head, of that i have no doubt.

I am quite certain that if our own dear Watermark ever did decide to lay waste to another human being he would set about it in a quirky and probably somewhat ironic manner, so that we could all laugh about it later.

I have the utmost faith that WM has more class than to indulge in a rather passée and clichéd murder spree.
 
charver said:
I think it is quite obvious that WM would never shoot anyone in the back of the head, of that i have no doubt.

I am quite certain that if our own dear Watermark ever did decide to lay waste to another human being he would set about it in a quirky and probably somewhat ironic manner, so that we could all laugh about it later.

I have the utmost faith that WM has more class than to indulge in a rather passée and clichéd murder spree.
Click to expand...

I agree with every word of that my wise friend .. but we should consider those who don't know and have come to love the WM that we know.

A casual visitor to this site may interpret his remarks differently and want no part of a site that allows threats of violence. Seriously, I'm not sticking my nose up admins butt, but I think we all owe them the courtesy of doing nothing the denegrates their site
 
ib1yysguy said:
The number of "fake" cases is inconsequential. Doctors who diagnose these kids know what they're doing, as to the MANY specialists who work with these kids to determine if they need services from nonprofits or the school system.
Click to expand...

Google "autism" with "misdiagnosis" and see for yourself how well these "specialists" are doing their job. Autism is an actual disorder; I do not deny this. What I am suggesting is that many (if not most) cases are misdiagnosed. Whether intentionally or not, well...I think it's a combination.

I stand by what I said, no matter how controversial it may be.

And the idea that the one psychologist you know is left wing makes all psychologists left wing is dumb beyond words. *facepalm*
Click to expand...

I made no such conjecture, but now that you mention it, it is probably true that most psychologists are left-wing.

And I don't claim to be tolerant of conservatives.
Click to expand...

How "liberal" of you.

You really should die a terrible death in some fire or other. You deserve it.
Click to expand...

And I believe it is your right to think that (so long as you don't act on it). Unlike you, I believe in individual liberty and freedom of thought and association. You know...everything this country is built on.
 
blackascoal said:
Shouldn't this woman be the poster child for conservative love of "life?"

She's had 14 children, no abortions?

If you're so-called "pro-life", why are you concerned about how much her children cost?

This points out the absolute and total ignorance of the "pro-life" position.
Click to expand...

There is no contradiction. You're simply demonstrating your own ignorance of the pro-life position. We are opposed to abortion, yes, but we also believe in personal responsibility (which is why I oppose abortion to begin with). She didn't become pregnant by accident. What she did was very irresponsible, and now we as taxpayers are forced to pick up the tab. Do you find that acceptable?
 
blackascoal said:
I agree with every word of that my wise friend .. but we should consider those who don't know and have come to love the WM that we know.

A casual visitor to this site may interpret his remarks differently and want no part of a site that allows threats of violence. Seriously, I'm not sticking my nose up admins butt, but I think we all owe them the courtesy of doing nothing the denegrates their site
Click to expand...

I have to agree with you. though I believe that the world is well rid of right wing nuts, and they are repellant in every way as this thread shows, even the appearance of advocating violence is to be avoided as stridently as one avoids mating with a right-winger. Which is to say; at all costs. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top