Do you understand the difference?
I'll understand if you don't.
Troll is nothing more than another gun hater.
Do you understand the difference?
I'll understand if you don't.
Do you understand that I was replying to SFs' question?
I'll understand if you don't.
Yes those manufacturers did. They made those guns without the ability to grow arms/legs, load by itself, and shoot by itself. Unless you can show me where one has done all three of those things, it's the PERSON misusing it that is the problem.
When those families can provide a video of a gun growing arms/legs, loading itself, and shooting itself, yes. Until then, no and that those who made the guns are responsible is foolish.
The gun grabbers think they have a new hook.
This is why our times are the most dangerous to our freedoms and why Cruz is our only hope to replace Scalia with an originalist to protect our liberties
Bars are.
Do you understand that I was replying to SFs' question?
I'll understand if you don't.
CFM;
Using a gun to kill is not a 'misuse' of the lethal weapon. That's what it was manufactured to do and that was its manufacturer's intent and it is inherent in its design.
You'll pardon me if I don't respond to all of your anticipated repetitious, infantile and erroneous contributions to this thread- as you've already established yourself as a repetitious, infantile and erroneous twat elsewhere. No need for duplication. Thank you.
EDIT; Having just read the article linked in the OP it's my opinion that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) should be struck down. That's the Democrat Party's intent, I believe. If not then it should be- and given the highest priority.
You must have led a very sheltered life. Try joining the debate.
None of the above are designated ' lethal weapons ' under law and none were manufactured as such. Amusing, boys, but irrelevant to the topic.
Guns aren't "lethal weapons" under the law. They are FIREARMS.
You'll find that you're mistaken;
Lethal Weapon Law & Legal Definition
http://definitions.uslegal.com/l/lethal-weapon/
Bars are.
this is idiot thinking because ALL guns are designed to kill. there is no other purpose for a gun.Can Sandy Hook Families Hold the Gun Industry Accountable?
In a sane country, yes.
The guns used in this crime were constructed for the purpose of killing. They were not bookends, paperweights or ballast. Their only purpose was to kill.
when you define sane as dictatorial, you would be correct. however, that doesn't apply in reality, so you must be insane.So the manufacturer produced the guns knowing what their purpose was and took no action to prevent them being used for that purpose. The courts of a sane country would hold that manufacturer accountable.
None of the above are designated ' lethal weapons ' under law and none were manufactured as such. Amusing, boys, but irrelevant to the topic.
The gun grabbers think they have a new hook.
This is why our times are the most dangerous to our freedoms and why Cruz is our only hope to replace Scalia with an originalist to protect our liberties
this is idiot thinking because ALL guns are designed to kill. there is no other purpose for a gun.
when you define sane as dictatorial, you would be correct.
however, that doesn't apply in reality, so you must be insane.
You'll find that you're mistaken;
Lethal Weapon Law & Legal Definition
http://definitions.uslegal.com/l/lethal-weapon/
as is your point, irrelevant that is.